Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/710,911

CONDUCTIVE POLYMER COMPOSITE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 16, 2024
Examiner
YOUNG, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Senergy Innovations Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
365 granted / 681 resolved
-11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
727
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 681 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The following Office action concerns Patent Application Number 18/710,911. Claims 1-27 are pending in the application. Claims 13, 26, 27 have been withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non-elected invention or species. Election/Restrictions A restriction requirement was sent to the Applicant on October 16, 2025. The Applicant was required to elect among several groups of inventions. The Applicant responded to the restriction requirement on December 15, 2025 and elected Group I, claims 1-25, with traverse. The applicant also elected a species of polyphthalamide. In traversing the restriction requirement, the Applicant argues that search and examination of the entire application could be conducted without serious burden. However, examination of subject matter in different statutory categories, such as those claimed in the instant application, and also including multiple chemical species, requires additional search and consideration for each limitation of the additional claims. Such additional search and consideration constitutes a serious burden for the examiner. Accordingly, claims 13, 26, 27 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to non-elected inventions or species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC §§ 102 and 103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 6-9, 11-12, 14-18, 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dufaure et al (US 2011/0281051). Dufaure et al teaches a composite comprising a polymer matrix and expanded graphite (par. 49-50, 61). The expanded graphite has a surface area of 15-30 m2/g (par. 50). Expanded graphite is graphitic carbon. The polymer matrix includes polyphthalamide (par. 23). The amount of graphite is 1-50 % by weight (par. 51). The graphite has a particle size of 20-500 µm (par. 16). The polymer includes polyphthalamide (par. 23). Polyphthalamide is an aromatic polymer. Claims 10 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Dufaure et al in view of Chandrasekhar et al (US 2011/0040007). Dufaure et al teaches expanded graphite as discussed above. Dufaure et al does not teach the thickness of the graphite. However, Chandrasekhar et al teaches expanded graphite having a thickness of less than 0.1 µm (100 nm)(par. 48). The expanded graphite provides thermal conductivity (par. 48). Dufaure et al is silent regarding the thickness of the expanded graphite. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated by design need to combine the graphite thickness of Chandrasekhar et al with the graphite of Dufaure et al in order to obtain a thickness which is suitable for providing thermal conductivity. Claims 1-6, 11, 12, 14-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nosker et al (US 2017/0218141) in view of Dufaure et al (US 2011/0281051). Nosker et al teaches a composite comprising graphene and graphite in a polymer matrix (par. 8-9). The graphite includes expanded graphite (par. 12). The total amount of graphene and graphite is 10-50 % by weight, of which at least 50 % is graphene (par. 9). The resulting amount of graphene is about 5-50 % by weight. The polymer matrix includes polyphthalamide (par. 19). Nosker et al does not teach the surface area of the expanded graphite. However, Dufaure et al teaches expanded graphite having a surface area of 15-30 m2/g (par. 50). The graphite provides conductivity to the composite material (abstract). A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated by design need to combine the graphite surface area of Dufaure et al with the composition of Nosker et al in order to obtain a graphite having surface area suitable for providing conductivity to the composite. Examiner’s Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Young whose telephone number is (571) 270-5078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000./WILLIAM D YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 January 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603192
CONDUCTIVE RESIN COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590200
Polyester Compositions Including Carbon Nanotubes as Microwave Absorbers in Sensor Applications
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573564
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573521
Elastomeric Conductive Composite Interconnect
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552972
CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 681 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month