Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/710,924

PASS THROUGH ASSEMBLY CONFIRMATION QUICK CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
Nov 18, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTIB2021060713
Examiner
DRAGICEVICH, ZACHARY T
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
A. Raymond et Cie
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
578 granted / 726 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03 September 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 3, and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Roman (USP 5,072,971). In regards to claim 1, Roman discloses a pass through assembly confirmation quick connector (see figs. 13-19), comprising: a pass through tube (1) having a cylindrical outer surface; a tubular locking ring (9) disposable on the outer surface of the pass through tube; a twist-lock mount (5, 13) releasably connecting the pass through tube and the locking ring, wherein twisting the locking ring relative to the pass through tube moves the locking ring between an unlocked position and a locked position; and a confirmation ring (8) releasably connected to the locking ring, the confirmation ring securing the locking ring in the locked position (see column 4, lines 1-8). the twist-lock mount includes at least one locking member (5) projecting from the outer surface of the pass through tube, and at least one female receptor (13) disposed on an inner surface of the locking ring, each female receptor corresponding to one of the at least one locking member, and each locking member being received in its corresponding female receptor (shown in fig. 16). In regards to claim 3, Roamn further discloses each female receptor includes an inlet slot (13) and a ramp (11,12) adjacent the slot. In regards to claim 13, Roman further discloses the confirmation ring is disk-shaped (shown in fig. 13). In regards to claim 14, Roman further discloses the pass through tube includes an annular flange (shown in fig. 14) extending radially from the cylindrical outer surface, and a sealing ring (shown in fig. 14) is adjacent the annular flange. In regards to claim 15, Roman further discloses a cooperative indication surface (see protrusion and groove in fig. 16) partly formed on the locking ring and partly formed on the confirmation ring, wherein the part of the indication surface on the locking ring is adjacent to and aligned with the part of the indication surface on the confirmation ring when the confirmation ring is connected to the locking ring (shown in fig. 34). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Roman as applied to claim 1 above. In regards to claims 4 and 5, Roman discloses the connector of claim 2 and further disclose two pairs of said locking members and two pairs of said female receptors (see fig. 16); Roman does not disclose one pair of locking members is circumferentially offset 90 degrees from the other pair of locking members, and the one pair of locking members is spaced from the other pair of locking members in an axial direction of the pass through tube; wherein one pair of female receptors is circumferentially offset 90 degrees from the other pair of female receptors. While Roman does not expressly disclose the claimed spacing of the locking members; the orientation of the locking members may be determined through the use of routine experimentation during the engineering design process to optimize the functionality of the device, suited to the intended use and desired parameters. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify Roman to have one pair of locking members circumferentially offset 90 degrees from the other pair of locking members, and the one pair of locking members is spaced from the other pair of locking members in an axial direction of the pass through tube; wherein one pair of female receptors is circumferentially offset 90 degrees from the other pair of female receptors, as the orientation of the locking members may be optimized to the desired operational parameters through the use of routine experimentation. A person of ordinary skill in the art undertaking such experimentation would have had a reasonable expectation of success and the results would have been predictable. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-20 are allowed. Claims 6-12 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY T DRAGICEVICH whose telephone number is (571)270-0505. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 - 4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew D. Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZACHARY T DRAGICEVICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679 09/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729785
A PLUMBING CONNECTOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721989
CONNECTOR COUPLING ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716529
EMT COMPRESSION SLIDE OVER COUPLING THREE PIECE ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716299
THREADED JOINT WITH ANTI-UNSCREWING DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703108
APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING AUTOMATED CONNECTION
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 10m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month