Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/710,980

A METHOD FOR FIREFIGHTING BY USE OF A FIREFIGHTING FOAM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 16, 2024
Examiner
DANDRIDGE, CHRISTOPHER R.
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Dafo Fomtec AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
375 granted / 575 resolved
-4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
633
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 5, the term "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). The same rejection applies to the additional instances of the limitation. Regarding claim 6, the terms "preferably" and “such as” render the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Achtmann (US 5,882,541). Regarding claim 1, Achtmann discloses a method for firefighting by use of a firefighting foam, said method comprising: adding a water-soluble polymer in solid form (Column 4, lines 59-62) to a water supply stream (Column 6, line 67-Column 7, line 2 and Column 10, lines 1-9, The polymer and other components of the foam composition are added to the water in an eductor at the time of application), and wherein the water supply stream provides an output of the firefighting foam (Column 10, lines 1-9, the supply of water in the eductor provides an output of the foam). Regarding claim 2, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein a foaming concentrate is added to the water supply stream simultaneously the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added to the water supply stream (Column 4, lines 59-62, The foaming composition includes a high-foaming surfactant as the foaming concentrate; Column 10, lines 1-9, The foaming concentrate, which includes surfactant and the polymer is added to the stream, which means the surfactant and polymer are added simultaneously to the stream). Regarding claim 3, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 2, wherein the foaming concentrate is a fluorine- free foaming concentrate (Column 5, line 16, The foaming concentrate Triton BG-10 does not include fluorine). Regarding claim 4, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the water supply stream provides the output of the firefighting foam (Column 10, lines 1-9). Regarding claim 5, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form comprises particles and/or granules, preferably is contained in a powder, preferably is a powder, preferably is a powder being able to flow freely (Column 6, lines 59-63, the polymer, natural gum is in particle powder form). Regarding claim 6, Achtmann discloses the method according to any of claim 1, wherein the water- soluble polymer is a natural polymer, preferably the water-soluble polymer in solid form is selected from the group consisting of hyaluronic acid; polyglutamic acid; alginic acid; alginates, such as sodium alginate or propylene glycol alginate; agar; carrageenan; galactomannan; glucomannan; starch; cellulose, such as methylcellulose, hydroxy ethylcellulose, or hydroxy propyl methylcellulose; gelatin; succinoglucan; pectin; gum, such as gum arabic, guar gum, welan gum, rhamsam gum, locust bean gum, tara gum, gellan gum, xanthan gum, acacia gum, diutan gum, chitosan gum, gum guaicum, neem gum, pistacia lentiscus gum, caranna, gum tragacanth, karaya gum, beta-glucan gum, chicle gum, kino gum, dammar gum, mastic gum, spruce gum, cassia gum, fenugreek gum, konjac gum, or ghatti gum; pysllium seed husk; or a derivative or modification thereof, or a combination thereof (Column 6, lines 59-63, the polymer is gum). Regarding claim 7, Achtmann discloses a method for forming a firefighting foam, said method comprising: adding a water-soluble polymer in solid form (Column 4, lines 59-62) to a water supply stream (Column 6, line 67-Column 7, line 2 and Column 10, lines 1-9, The polymer and other components of the foam composition are added to the water in an eductor at the time of application), adding a foaming concentrate to the water supply stream before, simultaneously or after the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added to the water supply stream, adding the foaming concentrate to the water supply stream before, simultaneously or after the intermediate stream is added to the water supply stream, or wherein the foaming concentrate is part of the intermediate stream (Column 4, lines 59-62, The foaming composition includes a high-foaming surfactant as the foaming concentrate; Column 10, lines 1-9, The foaming concentrate, which includes surfactant and the polymer is added to the stream, which means the surfactant and polymer are added simultaneously to the stream), and wherein the water supply stream provides an output of the firefighting foam (Column 10, lines 1-9, the supply of water in the eductor provides an output of the foam). Regarding claim 8, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the foaming concentrate is a fluorine- free foaming concentrate (Column 5, line 16, The foaming concentrate Triton BG-10 does not include fluorine). Regarding claim 9, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the water supply stream provides the output of the firefighting foam (Column 10, lines 1-9). Regarding claim 10, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form comprises particles and/or granules, preferably is contained in a powder, preferably is a powder, preferably is a powder being able to flow freely (Column 6, lines 59-63, the polymer, natural gum is in particle powder form). Regarding claim 11, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form is a natural polymer (Column 6, lines 59-63, natural gum). Regarding claim 12, Achtmann discloses the method according to any of claim 7, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form is added directly into the water supply stream (Column 10, lines 1-9, The polymer and other components are added directly into the water supply stream). Regarding claim 19, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form is a natural polymer, preferably is a polysaccharide, more preferably wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is selected from the group consisting of hyaluronic acid; polyglutamic acid; alginic acid; alginates, such as sodium alginate or propylene glycol alginate; agar; carrageenan; galactomannan; glucomannan; starch; cellulose, such as methylcellulose, hydroxy ethylcellulose, or hydroxy propyl methylcellulose; gelatin; succinoglucan; pectin; gum, such as gum arabic, guar gum, welan gum, rhamsam gum, locust bean gum, tara gum, gellan gum, xanthan gum, acacia gum, diutan gum, chitosan gum, gum guaicum, neem gum, pistacia lentiscus gum, caranna, gum tragacanth, karaya gum, beta-glucan gum, chicle gum, kino gum, dammar gum, mastic gum, spruce gum, cassia gum, fenugreek gum, konjac gum, or ghatti gum; pysllium seed husk; or a derivative or modification thereof, or a combination thereof; preferably selected from the group consisting of sodium alginate, carrageenan, gum arabic, galactomannan, guar gum, welan gum, rhamsam gum, locust bean gum, cellulose, glucomannan, tara gum, gellan gum, xanthan gum, acacia gum, diutan gum, chitosan gum, gelatin, alginic acid, succinoglucan, ghatti gum, methyl cellulose, hydroxy ethylcellulose, hydroxy propyl methylcellulose, pectin, starch, or a derivative or modification thereof, or a combination thereof (Column 6, lines 59-63, natural gum). Regarding claim 20, Achtmann discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added as a powder in said method (Column 6, lines 59-63, the polymer, natural gum is in particle powder form), preferably said powder being able to flow freely, at least when subjected to forces (The provision of powder provides for the claimed function). Claim(s) 7 and 12-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Libal (US 2021/0154512). Regarding claim 7, Libal discloses a method for forming a firefighting foam, said method comprising: adding a water-soluble polymer in solid form (Paragraph 18, the suspension agent is a water-soluble polymer) to a water supply stream (Paragraph 59, the suspension agent is added to water), adding a foaming concentrate to the water supply stream before, simultaneously or after the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added to the water supply stream, adding the foaming concentrate to the water supply stream before, simultaneously or after the intermediate stream is added to the water supply stream, or wherein the foaming concentrate is part of the intermediate stream (Paragraph 60, the foaming agent can be added to the water stream prior to the suspension), and wherein the water supply stream provides an output of the firefighting foam (Paragraph 77, the stream of water is used to issue the foam solution to a nozzle for firefighting). Regarding claim 12, Libal discloses the method according to any of claim 7, wherein the water- soluble polymer in solid form is added directly into the water supply stream (Paragraph 59). Regarding claim 13, Libal discloses the method according to claim 12, wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added directly into the water supply stream in an adding point which differs from an adding point where the foaming concentrate is added into the water supply stream (Paragraph 60, the polymer is added after the foaming concentrate). Regarding claim 14, Libal discloses the method according to claim 12, wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added into a foaming concentrate stream when the foaming concentrate stream is flown into the water supply stream (Paragraph 60, the polymer is added at the same time as the foaming concentrate). Regarding claim 15, Libal discloses the method according to claim 12, wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added into an aid stream when the aid stream is flown into the water supply stream or when the aid stream is flown into a foaming concentrate stream when the foaming concentrate stream is flown into the water supply stream (Paragraph 59, The polymer is mixed with water, which Examiner interprets as an aid stream; The mixture including the water, polymer and other components are added to the water supply stream). Regarding claim 16, Libal discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the water-soluble polymer in solid form is added into an aid stream when the aid stream is flown into the water supply stream (Paragraph 27, The suspension agent may include a first and second suspension agent; Examiner interprets the second suspension agent as an aid stream; The second suspension agent may be polyethylene glycol; Paragraph 59, the suspension agent, which includes the first and second suspension agent are added into water) and wherein the aid stream is added in an adding point which differs from an adding point for the foaming concentrate into the water supply stream (Paragraphs 59-60, The suspension which includes the polymer and aid stream (second suspension agent) are added to the water stream after the foaming concentrate). Regarding claim 17, Libal discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the aid stream comprises a water-soluble medium which inhibits the water-soluble polymer in solid form to dissolve and/or swell (Paragraph 27, polyethylene glycol). Regarding claim 18, Libal discloses the method according to any of claim 15, wherein the aid stream (Paragraph 24, second suspension) comprises glycol, butyl diglycol, mono ethylene glycol, mono propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, butyl glycol, hexylene glycol, ethanol or isopropyl alcohol, propylene glycol monobutyl ether, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, 1-methoxy-2-propanol, methanol, n-propanol, t-butyl alcohol, diethylene glycol, or a combination thereof (Paragraph 26, polyethylene glycol). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LaVergne (US 2020/0215372) in view of Achtmann. Regarding claim 21, LaVergne discloses a firefighting system comprising: a water supply line (110); a foaming concentrate dispenser unit (112) connected to the water supply line (Figure 1B); and a polymer dispenser unit (115) containing a water-soluble polymer (Paragraph 368), said polymer dispenser unit being connected to the water supply line (Figure 1B), but is silent as to whether the polymer is in solid form. Achtmann discloses a system wherein a water-soluble polymer in a foam composition is in solid form as an alternative to polymer in a liquid form (Column 6, lines 59-63). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify LaVergne with the disclosures of Achtmann, providing the polymer in solid form, as the configurations were known alternatives to provide a foam before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, and the modification would have yielded predictable results, including provision of foam for discharge in a fire protection system. Regarding claim 22, LaVergne in view of Achtmann discloses the firefighting system according to claim 21, wherein the system also comprises two separate supply lines (116, 119) in connection with the water supply line (Figure 1B), wherein the foaming concentrate dispenser unit is connected to one of said two separate supply lines (116) and wherein the polymer dispenser unit is connected to the other (119) of said two separate supply lines (Figure 1B). Regarding claim 24, LaVergne in view of Achtmann discloses the firefighting system according to any of claim 21, wherein the water supply line (110) is connected to a main water supply line (102) (Figure 1B). Pertaining to Claims 21 and 23 Regarding claim 21, LaVergne discloses a firefighting system comprising: a water supply line (206); a foaming concentrate dispenser unit (212) connected to the water supply line (Figure 2B); and a polymer dispenser unit (226) containing a water-soluble polymer (Paragraph 368), said polymer dispenser unit being connected to the water supply line (Figure 2B), but is silent as to whether the polymer is in solid form. Achtmann discloses a system wherein a water-soluble polymer in a foam composition is in solid form as an alternative to polymer in a liquid form (Column 6, lines 59-63). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify LaVergne with the disclosures of Achtmann, providing the polymer in solid form, as the configurations were known alternatives to provide a foam before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, and the modification would have yielded predictable results, including provision of foam for discharge in a fire protection system. Regarding claim 23, LaVergne in view of Achtmann discloses the firefighting system according to claim 21, wherein the foaming concentrate dispenser unit (212) and the polymer dispenser unit (226) are connected to one and the same supply line (210) which in turn is connected to the water supply line (206) (Figure 2B). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R. DANDRIDGE whose telephone number is (571)270-1505. The examiner can normally be reached M-T 9am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O. Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTOPHER R. DANDRIDGE Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /CHRISTOPHER R DANDRIDGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599924
ATOMIZATION BOTTLE AND LIQUID ATOMIZATION DEVICE INCLUDING THE ATOMIZATION BOTTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599793
COOPERATIVE FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594445
ADDRESSING OPTICAL FIRING CARTRIDGE USING CHROMATIC ABERRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594444
Mobile Fire-Fighting Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582855
INTEGRATED AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month