Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/711,491

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE PREPARATION METHOD, AND NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE PREPARED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 17, 2024
Priority
May 30, 2022 — CN 202210600976.7 +1 more
Examiner
DRODGE, JOSEPH W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Vontron Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1588 granted / 2030 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
2045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2030 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. In claim 1, the functional relationship, or nexus, of the last clause beginning “performing post-treatment to obtain the nanofiltration membrane, wherein…” is unclear and ambiguous since it is unclear what material or membrane layer undergoes a “post treatment or treatment following another treatment (is the post-treatment performed on or to the polyamide functional layer, or does such post-treatment concern formation of an additional layer, functional group(s) or other component of the membrane. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action. Claim 1 would distinguish and be non-obvious over all of the prior art in view of the recitation in independent claim 1 of: “A preparation method for a nanofiltration membrane, comprising the following steps: preparing a casting solution, and curing the casting solution on a reinforcement material to form a base membrane, wherein the casting solution contains a polymer and a solvent; contacting the base membrane with a water phase solution and an oil phase solution in turn to perform an interfacial polymerization reaction on the base membrane to form a polyamide functional layer, wherein the water phase solution contains a water phase monomer and an additive, the additive is a glycosylated sulfonamide compound, and the oil phase solution contains an oil phase monomer; and performing post-treatment (of the membrane generally, or of the polyamide functional layer) to obtain the nanofiltration membrane, wherein the post- treatment comprises hydroxylation treatment and crosslinking treatment, all of which is known or obvious in or over the prior art, now of record, in view of further recitation of wherein the water phase solution additive comprises a glycosylated sulfonamide compound. The closest prior art concerns the following: CN patent publication documents and their accompanying English translations of 103223300, 108325399, 111514769, 1129999898 all of which clearly teach the instantly claimed method preparation or formation steps in the claim 1, “preparing, and contacting clauses, except for recitation of an additive being a glycosylated sulfonamide compound or any reasonable closely related material; Patent publication WO 2022/071123 which teaches a nanofiltration membrane with a polyamide layer which bother undergoes crosslinking and hydroxylation reactions with regard to the polyamide resin of such layer; and Crich et al USPGPUBS Document 2010/0222546, Matwiejuk et al USPGPUBS Document 2019/0345183 and patent publication AU 2014203694 (all of which teach and describe treatment of pharmaceutical drugs or materials with a glycosylated sulfonamide compound and treatment of such drugs or materials with a nanofiltration membrane, or other form of filtration membrane, however teaching the glycosylated sulfonamide compound, as a material which is treated by a membrane, rather than as an additive utilized in the interfacial polymerization membrane preparation method step as claimed. The cited Mohmmad et al NPL publication teaches the general state of the art of nanofiltration membrane preparation, however does not suggest utilization of any additive similar to the claimed glycosylated sulfonamide compound. All of claims 2-20 are deemed to require performing of the method steps of claim 1, so are also deemed to be distinguished and non-obvious, including product-by-process claim 10 which inherently requires a polyamide polyfunctional membrane layer containing a glycosylated sulfonamide compound, or reactant thereof, and a base membrane layer containing a polymer, which are similarly not taught or obvious in view of the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Primary Examiner Joseph Drodge at his direct government formal facsimile phone number telephone number of 571-272-1140. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from approximately 8:00 AM to 1:00PM and 2:30 PM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encourage to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Benjamin Lebron, of Technology Center Unit 1773, can reached at 571-272-0475. The telephone number, for official, formal communications, for the examining group where this application is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from the Patent Examiner. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:///www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https:///www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions contact the Electronic Business Center EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (in USA or Canada) or 571-272-1000. JWD 08/29/2026 /JOSEPH W DRODGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729145
PRODUCTION DEVICE FOR PH/REDOX POTENTIAL-ADJUSTED WATER
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729138
WASTEWATER PROCESSING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723526
MODULE FOR ATTRACTING AND DETECTING DEBRIS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12691391
Extraction Of Guayule Resin
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12668505
Filter Cartridge and Water Filter Device
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.2%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2030 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month