Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/711,651

RESOURCE CONFLICT AVOIDANCE IN A SIDELINK RESOURCE POOL

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 20, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2021082628
Examiner
HEIBER, SHANTELL LAKETA
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
624 granted / 806 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
843
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 806 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 37 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 29-31 and 42 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rao et al. (Rao), U.S. Publication No. 2023/0283424 in view of Balasubramanian et al. (Balasubramanian), U.S. Publication No. 2022/0014872. Regarding Claim 29, Rao discloses a method of a first radio node for physical resource conflict avoidance in a resource pool between at least one position reference signal transmitted by the first radio node to at least a second radio node, and a further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node, or a further radio node, the method comprising the following steps: obtaining, at the first radio node, an initial position reference signal including a plurality of resource elements arranged in a predetermined pattern within a position reference signal slot (i.e., a WTRU may be configured to apply a muting pattern of a reference signal depending on a priority level associated with the reference signal (e.g., a PRS or SRSp); see paragraph [0135]); modifying, at the first radio node, the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal, the modified position reference signal having a reduced probability of conflicting with the further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node or the further radio node (i.e., a WTRU changing a present muting pattern of a reference signal (e.g., a PRS) to a different muting pattern in response to deprioritization of the reference signal…the WTRU may determine that the PRS transmission associated with the first muting pattern (e.g., muting pattern 1) is to collide with a control channel (e.g., PDCCH) transmission in a first time resource; see paragraphs [0132] and [0133]); and transmitting, from the first radio node, the modified position reference signal to the second radio node via at least one channel (i.e., the WTRU may use the second time resource to receive the unmuted PRS transmission and may continue to use the second muting pattern afterwards.; see paragraph [0133]). Rao fails to disclose side link. Balasubramanian discloses side link (i.e., a P-UE may communicate with one or more V-UEs on a sidelink to perform ranging and positioning related measurements (e.g., based on positioning reference signals (PRSs) communicated over the sidelink between the P-UE and the V-UEs); see paragraph [0070]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Balasubramanian’s invention with Rao’s invention for providing network assistance and improving positioning performance as described throughout Balasubramanian. Regarding Claim 42, Rao discloses a first radio node (i.e., WTRU 102; shown in figure 1B), comprising: a radio modem (i.e., transceiver 120; see figure 1B); non-transitory computer readable media including machine readable instructions (i.e., examples of computer-readable storage media include, but are not limited to, a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM); see figure 1B and paragraph [0170]); and a processor (i.e., processor 118; see figure 1B) configured to load and to execute the machine readable instructions, the machine readable instructions being for physical resource conflict avoidance in a resource pool between at least one position reference signal transmitted by the first radio node to at least a second radio node, and a further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node, or a further radio node, the machine readable instructions, when executed by the first radio node, causing the first radio node to perform the following steps: obtaining, at the first radio node, an initial position reference signal including a plurality of resource elements arranged in a predetermined pattern within a position reference signal slot (i.e., a WTRU may be configured to apply a muting pattern of a reference signal depending on a priority level associated with the reference signal (e.g., a PRS or SRSp); see paragraph [0135]), modifying, at the first radio node, the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal, the modified position reference signal having a reduced probability of conflicting with the further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node or the further radio node (i.e., a WTRU changing a present muting pattern of a reference signal (e.g., a PRS) to a different muting pattern in response to deprioritization of the reference signal…the WTRU may determine that the PRS transmission associated with the first muting pattern (e.g., muting pattern 1) is to collide with a control channel (e.g., PDCCH) transmission in a first time resource; see paragraphs [0132] and [0133]), and transmitting, from the first radio node, the modified position reference signal to the second radio node via at least one channel (i.e., the WTRU may use the second time resource to receive the unmuted PRS transmission and may continue to use the second muting pattern afterwards.; see paragraph [0133]). Rao fails to disclose side link. Balasubramanian discloses side link (i.e., a P-UE may communicate with one or more V-UEs on a sidelink to perform ranging and positioning related measurements (e.g., based on positioning reference signals (PRSs) communicated over the sidelink between the P-UE and the V-UEs); see paragraph [0070]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Balasubramanian’s invention with Rao’s invention for providing network assistance and improving positioning performance as described throughout Balasubramanian. Regarding Claim 30, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Rao further discloses wherein the modifying, at the first radio node, of the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal further includes: forming the modified position reference signal based on an implicitly indicated position derived from at least one item of control information corresponding to the position reference signal (see paragraph [0133]). Regarding Claim 31, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method as described above. Rao fails to disclose wherein the modifying, at the first radio node, of the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal further includes: identifying one or more reference coordinates of one or more subchannels in the side link resource pool corresponding to the side link position reference signal slot; and forming the modified position reference signal as a function of the one or more reference coordinates. Balasubramanian discloses wherein the modifying, at the first radio node, of the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal further includes: identifying one or more reference coordinates of one or more subchannels in the side link resource pool corresponding to the side link position reference signal slot; and forming the modified position reference signal as a function of the one or more reference coordinates (see paragraphs [0054]-[0060]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Balasubramanian’s invention with Rao’s invention for providing network assistance and improving positioning performance as described throughout Balasubramanian. Claim(s) 32-36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rao and Balasubramanian in view of Gummadi et al. (Gummadi), U.S. Patent No. 11,044,693. Regarding Claim 32, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Rao and Balasubramanian fail to disclose wherein the resource pool is separated into at least a first subset and a second subset of subchannels, wherein the first subset and a second subset have a different, and non-overlapping, frequency coordinates, and the method further comprises: identifying a first reference coordinate of the first subset of subchannels in the resource pool; identifying a second reference coordinate of the second subset of subchannels in the resource pool; forming a first modified position reference signal as a function of the initial position reference signal and the first reference coordinate, and forming a second modified position reference signal as a function of the initial position reference signal and the second reference coordinate; and transmitting the first and second modified position reference signals. Gummadi discloses wherein the resource pool is separated into at least a first subset and a second subset of subchannels, wherein the first subset and a second subset have a different, and non-overlapping, frequency coordinates, and the method further comprises: identifying a first reference coordinate of the first subset of subchannels in the resource pool; identifying a second reference coordinate of the second subset of subchannels in the resource pool; forming a first modified position reference signal as a function of the initial position reference signal and the first reference coordinate, and forming a second modified position reference signal as a function of the initial position reference signal and the second reference coordinate; and transmitting the first and second modified position reference signals (see col. 31, line 35-col. 32, line 26). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Gummadi’s invention with Rao’s and Balasubramanian’s invention for increasing positioning accuracy and avoiding interference as described throughout Gummadi. Regarding Claim 33, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Rao and Balasubramanian fail to disclose further comprising the following steps: detecting, at the first radio node, a request from either the second or the further radio node to transmit a preconfigured position reference signal at a preconfigured location of the resource pool, and wherein the modifying, at the first radio node, of the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal further includes: identifying at least one conflicting resource element of the initial position reference signal, wherein the transmission of the least one resource element would conflict with a corresponding resource element of the preconfigured position reference signal to be transmitted by either the second or the further radio node; and removing the at least one conflicting resource element from the initial position reference signal to form the modified position reference signal. Gummadi discloses further comprising the following steps: detecting, at the first radio node, a request from either the second or the further radio node to transmit a preconfigured position reference signal at a preconfigured location of the resource pool, and wherein the modifying, at the first radio node, of the initial position reference signal to form a modified position reference signal (see col. 35, lines 5-7) further includes: identifying at least one conflicting resource element of the initial position reference signal, wherein the transmission of the least one resource element would conflict with a corresponding resource element of the preconfigured position reference signal to be transmitted by either the second or the further radio node; and removing the at least one conflicting resource element from the initial position reference signal to form the modified position reference signal (see col. 35, line 57-col. 36, line 8). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Gummadi’s invention with Rao’s and Balasubramanian’s invention for increasing positioning accuracy and avoiding interference as described throughout Gummadi. Regarding Claim 34, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method as described above. Rao and Balasubramanian fail to disclose further comprising: muting, at the first radio node, at least one of the resource elements in the initial position reference signal. Gummadi discloses further comprising: muting, at the first radio node, at least one of the resource elements in the initial position reference signal (see col. 35, line 57-col. 36, line 8). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Gummadi’s invention with Rao’s and Balasubramanian’s invention for increasing positioning accuracy and avoiding interference as described throughout Gummadi. Regarding Claim 35, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method as described above. Rao and Balasubramanian fail to disclose further comprising the following steps: generating, at the first radio node, an orthogonal code uniquely identifying the first radio node; and modifying, at the first radio node, the initial position reference signal as a function of the orthogonal code identifying the first radio node, to form the modified position reference signal. Gummadi discloses further comprising the following steps: generating, at the first radio node, an orthogonal code uniquely identifying the first radio node; and modifying, at the first radio node, the initial position reference signal as a function of the orthogonal code identifying the first radio node, to form the modified position reference signal (see col. 35, line 57-col. 36, line 8). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Gummadi’s invention with Rao’s and Balasubramanian’s invention for increasing positioning accuracy and avoiding interference as described throughout Gummadi. Regarding Claim 36, Rao and Balasubramanian disclose the method as described above. Rao and Balasubramanian fail to disclose wherein the orthogonal code uniquely identifying the first radio node is designated at the first radio node using a position reference signal sequence identity. Gummadi discloses wherein the orthogonal code uniquely identifying the first radio node is designated at the first radio node using a position reference signal sequence identity (see col. 28, lines 29-59 and Table 1). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Gummadi’s invention with Rao’s and Balasubramanian’s invention for increasing positioning accuracy and avoiding interference as described throughout Gummadi. Claim(s) 38-41 and 43 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gummadi in view of Balasubramanian. Regarding Claim 38, Gummadi discloses a method of a second radio node for physical resource conflict avoidance in a resource pool between at least one position reference signal transmitted from a first radio node to at least the second radio node, wherein the second radio node is configured to compute its position relative to at least the first radio node, the method comprising the following steps: transmitting, from the second radio node to the first radio node (via LMF 120), a position reference signal request (i.e., the method includes receiving a request from a location server (e.g. an LMF 120, E-SMLC 208, SLP 132 or SLP 232) for configuration information for the PRS. The gNB 110-1 and the eNB 202 are examples of means for receiving the request from the location server; see col. 35, lines 5-28. The Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) 125 may support a location request for the UE 105 received from an external client 130 and may forward such a location request to the AMF 115 for forwarding by the AMF 115 to the LMF 120 or may forward the location request directly to the LMF 120.; see col. 10, lines 44-49); and receiving, at the second radio node from the first radio node via at least one channel, at least one modified position reference signal, the at least one modified position reference signal having a reduced probability of conflicting with a further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node or a further radio node, wherein the at least one modified reference signal is based on an initial position reference signal comprising a plurality of resource elements arranged in a predetermined pattern within a position reference signal slot (i.e., the method includes sending the configuration information for the PRS to the location server, wherein the configuration information enables location measurements of the PRS by the mobile device, wherein the location measurements enable determination of a location of the mobile device… The orthogonal characteristics may include a distinct muting pattern, where the PRS is transmitted during PRS positioning occasions in which PRS is not transmitted in at least some first cells of the plurality of neighboring cells, and where the PRS is not transmitted during PRS positioning occasions in which PRS is transmitted in at least some second cells of the plurality of neighboring cells.; see col. 35, line 29-col. 36, line 8). Gummadi fails to disclose side link. Balasubramanian discloses side link (i.e., a P-UE may communicate with one or more V-UEs on a sidelink to perform ranging and positioning related measurements (e.g., based on positioning reference signals (PRSs) communicated over the sidelink between the P-UE and the V-UEs); see paragraph [0070]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Balasubramanian’s invention with Rao’s invention for providing network assistance and improving positioning performance as described throughout Balasubramanian. Regarding Claim 43, Gummadi discloses a second radio node (i.e., UE 300; see figure 3), comprising: a radio modem (i.e., transceiver 315; see figure 3); non-transitory computer readable media including machine readable instructions (i.e., memory 311 is a non-transitory storage medium that may include random access memory (RAM), flash memory, disc memory, and/or read-only memory (ROM), etc; see figure 3 and col. 15, lines 1-4); and a processor (i.e., processor 310; see figure 3) configured to load and to execute the machine readable instructions, the machine readable instructions being for physical resource conflict avoidance in a resource pool between at least one position reference signal transmitted from a first radio node to at least the second radio node, wherein the second radio node is configured to compute its position relative to at least the first radio node, the machine readable instructions, when executed by the second radio node, causing the second radio node to perform the following steps: transmitting, from the second radio node to the first radio node (via LMF 120), a position reference signal request (i.e., the method includes receiving a request from a location server (e.g. an LMF 120, E-SMLC 208, SLP 132 or SLP 232) for configuration information for the PRS. The gNB 110-1 and the eNB 202 are examples of means for receiving the request from the location server; see col. 35, lines 5-28. The Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) 125 may support a location request for the UE 105 received from an external client 130 and may forward such a location request to the AMF 115 for forwarding by the AMF 115 to the LMF 120 or may forward the location request directly to the LMF 120.; see col. 10, lines 44-49), and receiving, at the second radio node from the first radio node via at least one channel, at least one modified position reference signal, the at least one modified position reference signal having a reduced probability of conflicting with a further position reference signal transmitted by either the second radio node or a further radio node, wherein the at least one modified reference signal is based on an initial position reference signal comprising a plurality of resource elements arranged in a predetermined pattern within a position reference signal slot (i.e., the method includes sending the configuration information for the PRS to the location server, wherein the configuration information enables location measurements of the PRS by the mobile device, wherein the location measurements enable determination of a location of the mobile device… The orthogonal characteristics may include a distinct muting pattern, where the PRS is transmitted during PRS positioning occasions in which PRS is not transmitted in at least some first cells of the plurality of neighboring cells, and where the PRS is not transmitted during PRS positioning occasions in which PRS is transmitted in at least some second cells of the plurality of neighboring cells.; see col. 35, line 29-col. 36, line 8). Gummadi fails to disclose side link. Balasubramanian discloses side link (i.e., a P-UE may communicate with one or more V-UEs on a sidelink to perform ranging and positioning related measurements (e.g., based on positioning reference signals (PRSs) communicated over the sidelink between the P-UE and the V-UEs); see paragraph [0070]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to consider Balasubramanian’s invention with Rao’s invention for providing network assistance and improving positioning performance as described throughout Balasubramanian. Regarding Claim 39, Gummadi and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Gummadi further discloses further comprising: calculating the position of the second radio node relative to the first radio node using the modified position reference signal (see col. 35, lines 29-41). Regarding Claim 40, Gummadi and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Gummadi further discloses further comprising: detecting, at the second radio node, a control information collision; and upon detection of a control information collision, performing successive decoding at the second radio node on the detected control information collision, to thereby detect at least two position reference signal sequences transmitted from first and third radio nodes, respectively (see col. 31, lines 5-25). Regarding Claim 41, Gummadi and Balasubramanian disclose the method where Balasubramanian has already been shown to teach side link as described above. Gummadi further discloses further comprising: obtaining, from the position reference signal sequences transmitted from first and third radio nodes, a position of the second radio node relative to the first radio node, and a position of the second radio node relative to the third radio node (see figures 5 & 9B). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANTELL LAKETA HEIBER whose telephone number is (571)272-0886. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 9am to 5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Addy, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /SHANTELL L HEIBER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645 June 5, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684358
LAWFUL INTERCEPTION ON NETWORK SLICES
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672000
UAS AUTHENTICATION AND SECURITY ESTABLISHMENT
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672001
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT OF SECURED DEVICES
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672112
VEHICLE-TO-ANYTHING RESOURCE SELECTION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659731
PHYSICAL LAYER SECRET-KEY CONFIGURATION AND SIGNALING
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.7%)
3y 0m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 806 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month