Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/712,123

TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 21, 2024
Priority
Dec 06, 2021 — JP 2021-197660 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, TRUC T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1150 granted / 1316 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1327
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1316 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the other side" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the first conductor" in lines 10 and 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear that whether or not “the first conductor” is referring to “a plate-like first conductor”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the second conductor" in lines 12-13 and line 17. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear that whether or not “the second conductor” is referring to “a plate-like second conductor”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "another member" in line 15 is unclear. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the other member" in line 18 is unclear. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record failed to teach a terminal to be connected to a plate-like mating conductor comprising: a case, a first spring member, a second spring member, a plate-like first conductor thicker than the first resilient piece, a plate-like second conductor thicker than the second resilient piece; the first conductor including a first connecting portion on one side in the longitudinal direction to be connected to another member and a first plate portion on the other side in the longitudinal direction, the second conductor including a second connecting portion on one side in the longitudinal direction to be connected to the other member and a second plate portion on the other side in the longitudinal direction, the first resilient piece biasing the first plate portion in a direction toward the second plate portion, the second resilient piece biasing the second plate portion in a direction toward the first plate portion, and a space between the first and second plate portions being a region where the mating conductor inserted along the first direction is sandwiched. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRUC T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2011. The examiner can normally be reached monday-friday (7-4). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M. Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRUC T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 21, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749840
CONTACT ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR INCLUDING THE CONTACT ASSEMBLY
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749844
CONNECTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738685
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738686
CONNECTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729711
LOCKING STRUCTURE AND BUCKLING WASHER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1316 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month