Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/712,132

EASILY CRUSHABLE ELECTRODEPOSITED COPPER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 21, 2024
Priority
Nov 29, 2021 — JP 2021-193500 +1 more
Examiner
ROE, JESSEE RANDALL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
JX Advanced Metals Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
1003 granted / 1313 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1313 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1-10 are pending and are currently under examination. Examiner Interpretation The Examiner has considered the phrase “high-purity” to not be indefinite since the claims define the purity as being 6N or 99.9999% pure or more. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “highly” in the phrase “highly crushable in claims 6-10 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “highly” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regard to claim 1, the closest prior art to Tarutani et al. (‘048) discloses high purity electrolytic copper having a purity of 99.99999 mass percent or more (N7 or more) [0023] wherein the average grain size would be in the range of 15 to 35 micrometers [0035]. However, Tarutani et al. (‘018) fails to specify wherein the average grain size of the electrodeposition cross section is in a range of 40 to 400 micrometers. Claims 6-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yamaguchi, Gota, and Hidekazu Mimura. "Effect of electrodeposition conditions on surface roughness of copper electroformed replicas." International Journal of Electrical Machining 25 (2020): 33. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jessee Roe whose telephone number is (571)272-5938. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 7:30 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curt Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSEE R ROE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741866
HYDROGEN STORAGE MATERIAL, HYDROGEN STORAGE CONTAINER, AND HYDROGEN SUPPLY APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742228
NICKEL-BASED SUPERALLOY, SINGLE-CRYSTAL BLADE AND TURBOMACHINE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735773
METAL ALLOY HAVING RHENIUM EFFECT
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735772
ALUMINUM ALLOY EXPANDED MATERIAL FOR WELDING USE, ALUMINUM ALLOY WELDING-JOINED BODY, AND METHOD FOR WELDING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735774
PROCESSING OF COBALT-TUNGSTEN ALLOYS
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+7.8%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1313 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month