Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/712,664

FIBER-REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITE HAVING IMPROVED UV AND GLOSS PROPERTIES, A PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 24, 2021 — DE 10 2021 130 810.0 +1 more
Examiner
AHMED, SHEEBA
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lamilux Composites GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
909 granted / 1126 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1126 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election with traverse of Group I, claims 17-24 and 29-35, in the reply filed on March 13,2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that the requirement for restriction has nothing to do with unpatentability of claims for any of the inventions being claimed. Applicants state that there is nothing in 35 USC § 121 that gives the Patent Office the authority to require restriction between different statutory classes of claims unless the claims cover "independent and distinct inventions." However, the Examiner disagrees. Group I, claims 17-24 and 29-35, drawn to a fiber-reinforced multilayer composite and Group II, claims 25-28, drawn to a method of producing a fiber-reinforced multilayer composite, do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because, under PCT Rule 13.2, they lack the same or corresponding special technical features as evidenced by US 4295907 A. Hence, the restriction requirement is maintained. Claims 17-35 are pending of which claims 25-28 are withdrawn and claims 17-24 and 29-35 are now under consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 17-24 and 29-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Burns et al. (US 2018/0134016 A1). Burns et al. disclose a layered composite article (equivalent to the fiber-reinforced, multilayer, flat plastic composite of the claimed invention) that can be used for flooring applications (thus meeting the limitations of claims 31 and 32) comprising: a) a rigid backing portion (equivalent to the matrix layer of the claimed invention) comprising a rigid core having a first surface and an opposed second surface, wherein the rigid core comprises at least one densified fiber batt (meeting limitations of claim 33) and wherein the at least one densified fiber batt is comprised of a first plurality of oriented fibers having a first melting point and a second plurality of oriented fibers having a second melting point different from the first melting point; and b) a decorative portion (equivalent to the top layer of the claimed invention) having a first surface and an opposed second surface, wherein the second surface of the decorative portion is affixed to the first surface of the rigid core. The first and second plurality of oriented fibers, each independently can comprise polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyamides, polyurethane, polylactic acid, acetal, co-polyester, co-polyamide, polystyrene, or a combination thereof (meeting the limitation that the matrix layer comprises at least one resin selected from the group consisting of an unsaturated polyester resin, a vinyl ester resin, an epoxy resin, a polyurethane resin, and a combination thereof). In yet another embodiment, the rigid core can further comprise a filler component (meeting limitations of claims 22 and 35). The decorative surface layer (i.e., the decorative portion) comprises polyvinyl chloride (PVC), whitened PVC, opaque PVC, oriented polypropylene (OPP), polyolefin (PO), woven polyethylene (PE), non-woven PE, woven polypropylene (PP), nonwoven PP, woven PET, whitened fiber PET, nonwoven PET, woven nylon, nonwoven nylon, conventional paper, conventional foil, or foiled oriented polypropylene. In still further aspects, the decorative surface layer can comprise one or more of a heat stabilized biaxially-oriented PET (BoPET), amorphous PET (aPET), recycled PET (rPET), polyethylene terephthlate glycol-modified (PETG), polyolefin, cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), cyclic olefin polymer (COP), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polylactic acid (PLA) copolymers, nylon, cellulose acetate, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (meeting the limitation that the top layer comprises an acrylate-based resin as recited in claim 1), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), thermoplastic elastomers (TPS), polycarbonate, polyethylene (PE), or a copolymer thereof. In certain aspects, the decorative surface or substrate layer has a thickness from about 0.5 mil to about 20 mil (equivalent to 12.7 to 508 microns and meeting the limitation that the top layer has a layer thickness in the cured state in the range of 40 to 150 µm). In some aspects, the decorative layer is affixed to the first surface of the rigid core with an adhesive (the adhesive layer is equivalent to the separating layer of the claimed invention and meeting the limitations of claims 21 and 34). In some aspects, an image layer can be applied to the decorative layer and the image layer can comprise water-based, soy-based, a UV-cured inks, and/or solvent-based pigments. The UV-cured inks can comprise photo-initiators, pigments, additives, monomers and oligomers of various polymers, and the like. In some exemplary aspects, the UV-cured inks can comprise 1-vinylhexahydro-2H-azepin-2-one or substituted phosphine oxide, thrimethylolpropane triacrylate, phenyl bis (2,4 6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (meeting the limitations of claims 18 and 19), epoxy acrylate oligomer, diacrylate monomer, multi-functional monomers, amine modified acrylate oligomer, 1-vinylhexahydro-2H-asepin-2-one, diacrylate oligomers, benzophenone, triacryalte monomers, 1-hydroxy-cyclohexylphenyl-ketone, 2 hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone, and the like. It is understood that the image layer can be applied to the decorative substrate layer or decorative surface layer and as such is a part of the decorative layer. See Abstract and paragraphs 0008, 0046, 0053, 0061, 0077, 0089, 90-0101, 0107-0110. With regards to the limitations that the plastic composite in a 1000-hour test method according to DIN-EN-ISO 4892-2-A1, in the color measurement space L/a/b, has a value delta E of < 1.0 and in a 3000-hour test method according to DIN-EN-ISO 4892-2-A1, in the color measurement space L/a/b, has a value delta E of < 1.7, there is a maximum 2 wt% loss of a reactive diluent based on the applied liquid layer material during the production process, and that the top layer, after a 9000-hour test method according to DIN-30 EN-ISO 4892-2-A1, has a gloss retention of at least 70% of the original gloss level of 100%, the Examiner takes the position that such property limitations are inherent in the laminate and the top layer of the claimed invention given that the structure and chemical composition of the laminate as taught by Burns et al. and that of the claimed invention are identical. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEEBA AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-1504. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CALLIE SHOSHO can be reached at 571-272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEEBA AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2024
Application Filed
May 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674232
LAMINATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LAMINATE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668046
COMPOSITE STRUCTURE DENTAL ORTHODONTIC SHEET AND DENTAL ORTHODONTIC DEVICE USING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664964
AN ACOUSTIC DAMPING ELEMENT WITH IMPROVED STACKABILITY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654400
SINGULATION AND EDGE-SEALING OF MULTILAYER POLYMER EYEPIECE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12630346
A MULTI-LAYER FLEXIBLE PACKAGING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 10m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1126 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month