Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/712,968

SWITCH DEVICE FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0161883 +1 more
Examiner
SAEED, AHMED M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ls Automotive Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 751 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 751 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 2-4 and 8-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 8/31/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chiba (WO2013168721). Regarding claim 1, Chiba teaches a switch device for a vehicle, comprising: a switch housing (2, 3) fixedly disposed in the vehicle; a switch knob 5 disposed on the switch housing so as to be manipulatable by a user, and including knob icons 15 disposed on one surface thereof; a switch unit 9 operated by the user's manipulation of the switch knob and configured to generate a changed electrical signal; and a light source unit 19 disposed within the switch housing and configured to output and transmit light generated therefrom to the switch knob, wherein the light source unit comprises a plurality of knob icon light sources (paragraph 1 of page 10) configured to enable beams of light emitted therefrom to be simultaneously irradiated onto one of the knob icons, and wherein the switch knob comprises, at least partially, a light control region part (16, 10) having a difference in thickness between the inner and outer surfaces of the switch knob (Figs. 1-7, and annotated figure below). PNG media_image1.png 317 615 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5-8 and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chiba in view of Tajima (JPH09306277, cited in the IDS) Chiba does not teach the light control region part comprising a plurality of light control region part pixels. However, Tajima teaches a similar switch device that comprises a switch knob 10 with a light control region part 8; wherein the light control region part comprises a plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) having different distances from a knob icon light source 2 (Fig. 3), as required by claim 5; wherein at least one of the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) comprises a different surface morphology from the others (Fig. 3), as required by claim 6; wherein a line segment tangent to at least one surface of the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) and a line segment tangent to at least another surface of the plurality of light control region part pixels intersect each other (annotated figure below), as required by claim 7; wherein the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) comprises a transparent material (the rubber switch 10 including the light portion 8 is made of transparent material, see paragraph 15), as required by claim 15; wherein at least one of the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) comprises an opaque material (the rubber switch 10 including the light portion 8 is made of semitransparent material, see paragraph 15), as required by claim 16; wherein the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) is integrally formed on the inner surface of the switch knob 10, (Fig. 3), as required by claim 17; wherein the plurality of light control region part pixels (concave/convex) is formed to be attachable to the inner surface of the switch knob 10 (Fig. 3), as required by claim 18. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Tajima in the switch device of Chiba to provide a better illumination. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED M SAEED whose telephone number is (571)270-7976. The examiner can normally be reached 10-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED M SAEED/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749633
DEVICE FOR LIMITING MOVEMENT OF MOVABLE PART IN ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738429
CURVED-SURFACE BUTTON STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736710
OBSTRUCTION DETECTING APPARATUS, OBSTRUCTION DETECTING SYSTEM, ELECTRIC LIFTING DESK, AND ELECTRIC LIFTING CUPBOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738433
KEYBOARD DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738432
SWITCH DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 751 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month