Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/713,066

CRISPY BANANA SNACK PRODUCTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 19, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCA2022050076
Examiner
LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE
Art Unit
1791
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Enwave Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
34%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 34% of cases
34%
Career Allowance Rate
207 granted / 604 resolved
-30.7% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
94.3%
+54.3% vs TC avg
§102
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 604 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-11 in the reply filed on 4/22/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wefers(US 2002/0006464). Regarding claims 1-7,9, Wefers teaches formation of porous, crunchy dried banana food product in which banana chunks are puffed and dried in less than atmospheric pressure at a pressure of 20-100mbar(15-75 Torr) under microwave radiation(para 62). Wefers does not specifically teach that banana puree and banana flour is mixed to form a composition that is further dried. However, it would have been obvious to adjust the types and amounts of banana depending on the moisture content and texture desired in the final product. Wefers teaches formation of banana chips which inherently contain natural sugar(sweetener). It would have been obvious to adjust the amount of banana present in the initial product and the type of banana(unripe vs ripe) depending on the sweetness desired. Regarding claim 8, Wefers teaches that the banana chunks after pretreatment and before the puffing step have a moisture content of 40%(para 30). Regarding claims 10-12, Wefers teaches that the chips are dried to a moisture content of 2-6%(para 101). It would have been obvious to adjust the microwave stages, time and power levels in order to achieve the desired final moisture content. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHERINE D LEBLANC whose telephone number is (571)270-1136. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-4PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nikki Dees can be reached at 571-270-3435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE D LEBLANC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677858
MUSCLE ENHANCING PRODUCTS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672735
INFANT FORMULA PREPARATION APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667116
METHODS OF COVERING FROZEN FOOD PRODUCTS IN CHOCOLATE
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667113
METHOD OF REMOVING SPORES FROM RAW GOAT MILK, PROCESS FOR PREPARING PURIFIED GOAT MILK, GOAT MILK ACCORDINGLY PRODUCED AND ITS USE AND CHEESE MAKING METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12622443
COLD BREW BEVERAGE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
34%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+35.8%)
3y 9m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 604 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month