Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/713,365

Collet Chuck

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Feb 10, 2022 — DE 102022103148.9 +1 more
Examiner
GATES, ERIC ANDREW
Art Unit
3722
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Jbs System GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
868 granted / 1100 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1100 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Invention II, claims 2-7 in the reply filed on 8 June 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the claims are incorrectly grouped. While it is agreed that claim 1 would be examined with claims 2-7, claim 10 would still be subject to restriction. However, in light of the allowability of independent claim 1, claim 10 has been examined and the requirement for restriction withdrawn. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the guide bush of claims 1 and 10, the collet chuck holder of claim 1, the device communicating with the bottom of the blind hole of claims 1 and 10, the marking of claims 2-3 and 6, and the wear-prone electrical component of claims 4-6 and 10 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the wear-prone electrical component" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the electrical component" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 2-7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 2-7 fail to include all the limitations of the claim upon which they depend. Specifically, claims 2-7 fail to include the guide bush in the preamble of claim 1. Claim 10 fails to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Specifically, claim 10 fails to include the collet chuck in the preamble of claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 is allowed. Claim 1 is the independent claim. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record is WO 2019/179546 to Jess, which discloses a guide bush 10 with a collet chuck 30, which is mounted axially displaceably in a collet chuck holder 20, having a plurality of jaws (not disclosed but inherent for a collet chuck) which are radially movable with respect to one another and which, with their clamping faces, form a common receptacle (see figure 1) for guiding a rod that is to be machined in a lathe (see description), comprising: a device 50 being designed to output an alarm signaling upon detection of a predetermined position and/or a predetermined radial extent and/or a predetermined pressure exceeding or falling below value output an alarm. Suffice it to say, the patent to Jess does not disclose a blind hole which is routed in at least one jaw from the outer face, opposite the clamping face of the jaw, in the direction of the clamping face, with a blind-hole bottom which is delimited on the one hand by the clamping face and on the other hand by the blind hole and which, through wear of the clamping face, is configured to effect the formation of a through-hole indicating the wear of the collet chuck, or wherein the device communicates with the bottom of the blind hole, or wherein the alarm signaling the wear of the collet chuck when a through-hole is formed due to wear of the bottom of the blind hole, wherein the device is designed for applying compressed air to the blind hole, for detecting the air pressure in the blind hole and, in the event of a drop in air pressure detected due to the formation of the through-hole, for outputting the alarm signalling the wear of the collet chuck as claimed in independent claim 1, and as such does not anticipate the instant invention as disclosed in independent claim 1. Furthermore, there is no combinable teaching in the prior art of record that would reasonably motivate one having ordinary skill in the art to so modify the teachings of Jess, and thus, for at least the foregoing reasoning, the prior art of record does not render obvious the present invention as set forth in independent claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. EP 3412387 is directed to a collet and guide bush. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC ANDREW GATES whose telephone number is (571)272-5498. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th 9-6, Alt Fr 9-5. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil Singh, can be reached on 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC A. GATES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3722 16 July 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691507
DRILL BODY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DRILL BODY
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678875
TAP AND DIE HANDLE ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678865
CORING TOOL
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667894
DRILLING TOOL INCLUDING A STEP DRILL BIT
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667897
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A WORKPIECE THREADED HOLE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1100 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month