Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/713,433

FLUID PRESSURE CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2021 — JP 2021-194392 +1 more
Examiner
TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Advics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
660 granted / 780 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ota et al. (JP 2005289165 A). Re claim 1, Ota et al. teaches a fluid pressure control device comprising: a pump (4); a motor (20) configured to drive the pump; a housing (100) having an outer surface, a first hole (132) that opens in a first surface of the outer surface which faces the motor, the first hole accommodating the pump (41, 28) and two second holes (113, 113) that open in the outer surface and are separated from the first hole, the two second holes being arranged at an interval in a first direction; and a current supply unit (10) allowing a current for driving the motor to flow and passing through the housing and a through hole (131) opened in the first surface and a second surface which is opposite to the first surface of the outer surface, wherein the through hole has a first part (23b) located between the two second holes. (Fig. 3-5) Ota et al. do not teach wherein a width of the first part in the first direction is smaller than a width of the first part in a second direction along the second surface and orthogonal to the first direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide a first part wherein a width of the first part in the first direction is smaller than a width of the first part in a second direction along the second surface and orthogonal to the first direction as a matter of choice which a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found to be an obvious change in shape. (MPEP 2144.04 IV. B.) Re claim 2, Ota et al. as modified teaches wherein a distance between the two second holes (113, 113) is smaller than the width of the first part (23b) in the second direction. Re claims 3 and 9, Ota et al. as modified does not teach wherein the current supply unit includes a plurality of conductors arranged in the second direction. Ota et al. is silent as to the number of conductors within part 23. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the number of connectors as necessary to provide sufficient communication between the motor and current supply unit. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8, and 10-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Aoki et al. teaches a fluid pressure control device comprising: a pump; a motor configured to drive the pump; a housing having an outer surface, a first hole that opens in a first surface of the outer surface which faces the motor, the first hole accommodating the pump, and two second holes that open in the outer surface and are separated from the first hole, the two second holes being arranged at an interval in a first direction; and a current supply unit allowing a current for driving the motor to flow and passing through the housing and a through hole opened in the first surface and a second surface which is opposite to the first surface of the outer surface, wherein the through hole has a first part located between the two second holes. Koyama et al. teaches a fluid pressure control device comprising: a pump; a motor configured to drive the pump; a housing having an outer surface, a first hole that opens in a first surface of the outer surface which faces the motor, the first hole accommodating the pump, and two second holes that open in the outer surface and are separated from the first hole, the two second holes being arranged at an interval in a first direction; and a through hole opened in the first surface and a second surface which is opposite to the first surface of the outer surface. Tamai teaches a fluid pressure control device comprising: a pump; a motor configured to drive the pump; a housing having an outer surface, a first hole that opens in a first surface of the outer surface which faces the motor, the first hole accommodating the pump, a current supply unit allowing a current for driving the motor to flow and passing through the housing and a through hole opened in the first surface and a second surface which is opposite to the first surface of the outer surface. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-7127. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday, 7:00AM-3:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3616 MTWAugust 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747765
TEMPERATURE SENSOR AND DISC BRAKE HAVING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734854
HYDRO BUSHING
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736099
DISC BRAKE DEVICE FOR RAILWAY VEHICLE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729728
BRAKE LINING ARRANGEMENT FOR A VEHICLE DISC BRAKE
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722615
HYDRAULIC ADJUSTMENT UNIT, BRAKE SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month