Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/713,861

MODULE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 28, 2024
Examiner
ELNAKIB, AHMED
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Thk Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
447 granted / 568 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
596
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 568 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-5 of U.S. Application No. 18713861 filed on 05/28/2024 are presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/28/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the first fitting hole and the second fitting hole is formed to have a length in the guide direction larger than a diameter of the first pin and a diameter of the second pin” should read “a first fitting hole and the second fitting hole is formed to have a length in the guide direction larger than a diameter of a first pin and a diameter of a second pin.”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Taniyama Yasushi (JP 2000-312463; Hereinafter, “Yasushi”). Regarding claim 1: Yasushi discloses a module system (rail modules Ma, Mb of the linear motor M) comprising: a first module (Ma) in which a first guide (8a) device is incorporated and a second module (Mb) in which a second guide device (8b) is incorporated, the first module and the second module being positioned along a guide direction (annotated fig. 8 below), the module system further comprising: a first positioning portion (bolt 23 or pins 24) configured to position the first module (Ma) and the second module (Mb) in such a manner that a gap (e1, and/or e2) between an end portion of the first guide device (8a) on a second module side and an end portion of the second guide device (8b) on a first module side is a predetermined distance (e1 or e2; fig. 6-8); and PNG media_image1.png 443 880 media_image1.png Greyscale a second positioning portion (surfaces 16a, and 16b) configured to position the first module (Ma) and the second module (Mb) in such a manner that a shift (σ) between an axial direction (annotated fig. 8 above) of the first guide (8a) device and an axial direction of the second guide (8b) device in a direction orthogonal to the guide direction in a plan view is equal to or less than a predetermined amount of shift (σ). Regarding claim 3/1: Yasushi discloses the limitations of claim 1 and further discloses that at least one of the first fitting hole and the second fitting hole (22a, 22b) is formed to have a length in the guide direction (i.e. hole diameter) larger than a diameter of the first pin (pin 24 or bolt 23) and a diameter of the second pin (23; otherwise, the bolt/pin 23 or 24 will not in the holes 22a, 22b). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2,4-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, the limitations in claim 2, “…the first positioning portion comprises: a first pin provided on the first module and protruding in the direction orthogonal to the guide direction in a plan view; a second pin provided on the second module and protruding in the direction orthogonal to the guide direction in a plan view; and a first connecting member having a first fitting hole and a second fitting hole arranged in the guide direction, the first connecting member being fixed to the first module and the second module in a state where the first pin is fitted into the first fitting hole and the second pin is fitted into the second fitting hole” in the combination as claimed are neither anticipated nor obvious over the prior arts in record. Claims 4-5 are also objected-to for their dependency on claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED ELNAKIB whose telephone number is (571)270-0638. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED ELNAKIB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601373
REFRIGERANT COMPRESSOR INCLUDING GROOVED AUXILIARY BEARING INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597816
ROTOR, PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR AND POWERTRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584521
HYBRID AIRFOIL BEARING WITH ACTIVE DAMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587064
ELECTRIC MOTOR SYSTEM, TURBO COMPRESSOR, AND REFRIGERATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587071
DRIVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 568 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month