Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/714,143

TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZING ASSISTANCE CHANNEL ROUTING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Examiner
LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Afiniti Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
792 granted / 961 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
993
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
71.5%
+31.5% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions In response to the election/restriction requirement sent out on 12/23/2025, applicant has elected group I (Claims 1-8 and 21) without traverse. Claim Objections 1.Claim 21, line 5 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 21, line 5 states “wherein the initial activity data;” which is objected for containing incomplete sentence. For examination purposes, examiner not consider the phrase “wherein the initial activity data” Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 1-8 are allowed. 3. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The applicant’s set of claims filed on 02/09/2026 have been reviewed by the examiner in view of the prior arts of a search; and it is agreed that the prior arts of the search fail to disclose “obtaining initial activity data associated with the contact interacting with the unassisted channel of the service provider, wherein the initial activity data comprises at least one of information about the contact during a predetermined period of time after the first time; or a number of interactions of the contact on the unassisted channel; determining to direct the contact to at least one assisted channel of the service provider based on the initial activity data and the agent data; based on determining to direct the contact to the at least one assisted channel of the service provider, transmitting an electronic notification to a personal device of the contact; after transmitting the electronic notification to the contact, obtaining a request from a personal device to establish an agent connection to the contact center system on the at least one assisted channel; and pairing, based on the request, a personal device of the contact to the contact center system, wherein the pairing establishes a communication between an agent of the plurality of agents and the contact” as shown in the independent claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4.The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sayko et al. (US 20140126708) in view of LORE et al. (US 20180190291). Regarding claim 21, Sayko discloses a method comprising: obtaining contact connection data associated with a contact at a first time, wherein the contact connection data comprises activity of the contact on a first channel of a service provider (Paragraphs: 0050-0051: Sayko discusses how the contact center identify and monitor the user and to track the user's activity; and how the system monitor and tracks a user's session on a web application); obtaining initial activity data associated with the contact interacting with the first channel (Paragraphs: 0050-0051: monitor and to track user's activity), wherein the initial activity data; obtaining second channel data comprising a capacity of a second channel of a service provider (Paragraphs: 0044 and 0058: Sayko discusses how determination is made that the selected agent has a WebRTC-capable browser); Sayko discloses the invention set forth above but does not specifically point out “determining to direct the contact to the second channel based on the initial activity data and the second channel data; based on determining to direct the contact to the second channel, transmitting an electronic notification to a personal device of the contact; after transmitting the electronic notification to the contact, obtaining a request from a personal device to establish a connection to the second channel” LORE however discloses determining to direct the contact to the second channel based on the initial activity data and the second channel data (Paragraphs: 0007 and 0060: LORE discusses how a contact center Interaction Router/Manager use the data collected and stored in the memory, e.g., data store, the attributes about what and why the customer initiated the conversation including emotion and sentiment scores to identify an appropriate agent/specialist to handle the customer interaction); based on determining to direct the contact to the second channel, transmitting an electronic notification to a personal device of the contact (Paragraphs: 0007 and 0064-0067: LORE discusses how a notification engine may monitor the customer interaction to determine the customer issue, and inform the customer; and how the system routes customer interactions to agents/specialists equipped to handle customers based on attributes captured during interaction with assisted and unassisted channels); after transmitting the electronic notification to the contact, obtaining a request from a personal device to establish a connection to the second channel (0007, 0041-0042 and 0061: LORD discusses how notification engine monitor the customer interaction to determine whether to generate and send a notification to customer or contact; and how Customer interactions also include alternate channels, such as websites, chat, email, SMS, etc. Other channels, i.e. it would have been obvious to obtain a request from a personal device to establish a connection, after confirming from a contact via a notification). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sayko, and modify a system to determine to direct the contact to the second channel based on the initial activity data and the second channel data; based on determining to direct the contact to the second channel, transmitting an electronic notification to a personal device of the contact; after transmitting the electronic notification to the contact, obtaining a request from a personal device to establish a connection to the second channel, as taught by LORE, thus allowing to drive workforce management forecasting and scheduling resulting in cost savings and improved agent/specialist availability, as discussed by LORE. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOSEF K LAEKEMARIAM whose telephone number is (571)270-5149. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-6:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at (571) 272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YOSEF K. LAEKEMARIAM Primary Examiner Art Unit 2651 /YOSEF K LAEKEMARIAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604140
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CROSS-FADING AUDIO SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598443
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PROVIDING FADED AUDIO EXPERIENCE DURING TRANSITION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593007
SECURE VIDEO VISITATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593187
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND MEASUREMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12570197
IN-VEHICLE CONVERSATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month