Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/714,664

PROGRAMMABLE ROTARY VACUUM PACKING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Dec 13, 2021 — NE 783434 +1 more
Examiner
MARTIN, VERONICA
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Amcor Flexibles North America Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
308 granted / 375 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.5%
+29.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 375 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, “wherein each shell is individually addressable and receives actuator timing and sequence commands that differ from other shells while the turntable is in uninterrupted rotation” fails to comply with the written description requirement because the disclosure does not support this limitation. The specification does not disclose that each shell is individually addressable nor that each shell receives actuator timing and sequence commands that differ from other shells while the turntable is in uninterrupted rotation. Regarding claims 2-10, claims 2-10 are rejected because they depend from rejected claim 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, “the turntable” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claims 2-10, claims 2-10 are rejected because they depend from rejected claim 1. Prior Art Rejection Claims 1-10 are currently free from prior art, however, a subsequent prior art rejection may be made in view of Applicant’s amendments submitted to overcome the above rejections. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-9, filed 03/20/2026, with respect to the 35 USC 103 rejection of claims 1-10 have been fully considered and are persuasive, as Applicant has amended the claims to overcome the rejection. The 35 USC 103 rejection of claims 1-10 has been withdrawn. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VERONICA MARTIN whose telephone number is (571)272-3541. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at (571)270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VERONICA MARTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Aug 04, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672871
MATERIAL COMBINATIONS AND PROCESSING METHODS FOR A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667947
WORK MACHINE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667943
IMPACT TOOL WITH A MULTI-PIECE ANVIL ASSEMBLY
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662277
STEAM HEATED SHRINK TUNNEL
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661765
FASTENING TOOL HAVING A MAGAZINE PUSHER POSITION DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 375 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month