Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/714,816

Method for transmitting a data stream in a communication network, method for processing a data stream, method for controlling the processing of a data stream, and corresponding devices, terminal apparatus, execution entity, control entity, system and computer programs

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Dec 08, 2021 — FR FR2113160 +1 more
Examiner
HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Orange
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 690 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 690 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment This action is in response to an amendment filed June 25, 2026. Claims 1, 10, and 15 have been amended. Claims 1-3, 10, 13, and 15 remain pending in this application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 25, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants are arguing in substance the following: Arguments to Claims 1, 10, and 15 : a) Applicant(s) contend- Duan does not disclose ‘inserting a priority indicator associated with the type of stream into the data stream, the priority indicator belonging to a group comprising at least one first indicator associated with the first type of stream and a second indicator associated with the second type of stream, the first priority indicator and the second priority indicator having different values’. Response to argument a: The Examiner respectfully disagrees. To begin, Duan discloses ‘inserting a priority indicator associated with the type of stream into the data stream’ in [0019]. In [0019], Duan discloses a first message which includes first information of one or more network slices that a terminal is subscribe to AND a priority corresponding to the first information is received by an access and mobility management function (AMF). Duan also discloses ‘the priority indicator belonging to a group comprising at least one first indicator associated with the first type of stream and a second indicator associated with the second type of stream’ in [0018]. In [0018], Duan discloses determining a priority of a service type for received service requests. Service requests (data streams), received by the AMF, are processed based on their priority of a service type of a service corresponding to the service requests. Finally, Duan discloses ‘the first priority indicator and the second priority indicator having different values’ in the Abstract and [0009]. In the Abstract and [0009], Duan discloses different priority values by disclosing higher priority service requests are processed prior to a lower priority service requests. Therefore, Duan discloses the features of the claimed limitation as outlined above. The examiner has addressed arguments directed to claim limitations as stated only. Arguments not directed towards claim limitations have not been addressed. Applicant(s) is/are urged to direct arguments for claim limitations recited, because arguments not directed to claim limitations and statements are not given value since they do not appear in the claim. As to any claims not specifically discussed, the applicant(s) argued that it was patentable for one of the reasons discussed above. Please see response to above arguments for unspecified discussions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 10, 13, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Duan et al. (US 2020/0077327 A1). With respect to claim 1, Duan discloses a method for transmitting a data stream received from a software application running on a terminal apparatus ([0014]-[0015], terminal device sends a registration request message to an access and mobility management entity (AMF)), in a communication network to which said terminal apparatus is connected, said network being divided into a plurality of network slices (Abstract and [0002], network slicing), wherein said method is implemented at said terminal apparatus and comprises: selecting a network slice from said plurality at least according to an item of information comprised in a header of the data stream ([0016], NSSAI (Network Slice Selection Assistance Information) is used by network device to select network slice); obtaining a type of said stream, said type belonging to a group comprising at least one first type and a second type of stream ([0066], type of registration request amongst various types of data streams such as, initial registration, mobility registration update, and etc.); inserting a priority indicator associated with the type of stream into the data stream, the priority indicator belonging to a group comprising at least one first indicator associated with the first type of stream and a second indicator associated with the second type of stream, the first priority indicator and the second priority indicator having different values (Abstract, [0019], [0021], and [0037], priority of first message includes a first or second priority such as high and low priorities); and transmitting the data stream comprising the priority indicator in the selected network slice (Abstract, [0015], [0019], and [0020], AMF processes or forwards network slices based on priority). With respect to claim 2, Duan discloses the method for transmitting a data stream according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises: previously receiving at least one rule for routing a data stream transmitted by said software application, said rule comprising at least an identifier of said software application, said type of stream, said priority indicator associated with said type of stream and an identifier of a said network slice ([0066]-[0067]); storing in memory said at least one routing rule ([0040] and [0067]); and applying said at least one routing rule when implementing said selection and said insertion ([0066]-[0067]). With respect to claim 3, Duan discloses the method for transmitting a data stream according to claim 2, wherein the method further comprises obtaining an operating mode of said software application, said operating mode belonging to a group comprising at least one first operating mode and a second operating mode, and wherein said at least one routing rule is associated with said operating mode ([0065] and [0150]). With respect to claim(s) 10, 13, and 15, the device, terminal and non-transitory medium of claim(s) 10, 13, and 15 does/do not limit or further define over the method of claim(s) 1. The limitations of claim(s) 10, 13, and 15 is/are essentially similar to the limitations of claim(s) 1 Therefore, claim(s) 10, 13, and 15 is/are rejected for the same reasons as claim(s) 1. Please see rejection above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ESTHER B. HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6a-2p ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached at 571-270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ESTHER B. HENDERSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458 August 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750407
Method and Apparatus for Security Management of Internet of Things Traffic, and Power Internet of Things System
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745076
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR USER AUTHENTICATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743254
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISCOVERING AUTOMATABLE TASKS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726549
NEXT GEN ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA) AND VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK (VPN) INCLUDING CLOUD SECURE ACCESS SERVICE EDGE (SASE)
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12706895
EMAIL-BASED AUTHENTICATION FOR SIGN IN AND SECURITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 690 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month