Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/714,859

CLOTHING PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0169352 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO D
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
202 granted / 371 resolved
-15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
397
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 371 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 3 recites the limitation “air discharge pip” in line 3. Please amend to --- air discharge pipe ---. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-2, 4-5, 7, 10-12, and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cavarretta et al. (US 2022/0056630; hereinafter Cavarretta). PNG media_image1.png 450 474 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 468 568 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 490 552 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 462 574 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 480 502 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Cavarretta shows a laundry treatment apparatus (1, figs. 1, 2) comprising: a cabinet (2, figs. 1, 2) defining an appearance of the laundry treatment apparatus (1, figs. 1, 2); an inner case (3, fig. 1) provided in the cabinet (2, figs. 1, 2), the inner case (3, fig. 1) defining a laundry treatment space (interior space of item 3, fig. 1) configured to receive laundry therein and having an opening (opening of item 3 at item 4a, figs. 1, 2) through which the laundry is introduced and taken out; a machine compartment (compartment below item 3, fig. 1) positioned at a lower portion of the inner case (3, fig. 1) in the cabinet (2, figs. 1, 2); a heat supply (30, ANNOTATED fig. 1, [0113]) comprising an evaporator (32, fig. 1, [0113]), which is provided in the machine compartment (compartment below item 3, fig. 1) so as to remove moisture from air introduced from the laundry treatment space (interior space of item 3, fig. 1), a condenser (31, fig. 1, [0113]) configured to heat the air introduced from the laundry treatment space (interior space of item 3, fig. 1), and a compressor (33, fig. 1, [0113]) configured to supply compressed refrigerant to the condenser (31, fig. 1, [0113]); a circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]) provided in the machine compartment (compartment below item 3, fig. 1) and defining a flow channel in which the air in the laundry treatment space (interior space of item 3, fig. 1) is circulated; and a base (24, figs. 1, 2, ANNOTATED figs. 3, 4) provided in the machine compartment (compartment below item 3, fig. 1) so as to support a lower portion of the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]), wherein the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]) comprises: a duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) configured to receive the evaporator (32, fig. 1, [0113]) and the condenser (31, fig. 1, [0113]) therein; and an air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) which extends backwards from the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to guide air introduced into the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to an outside of the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]), and wherein a diameter of the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) is smaller than (as shown in figs. 3-5) a width of the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 2, Cavarretta shows wherein the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) comprises: an air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) which extends backwards from the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to guide air in the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4); and an air discharge pipe (ANNOTATED, fig. 4) which extends backwards to discharge the air in the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to an outside of the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 4, Cavarretta shows wherein an inside diameter of the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) decreases in a direction in which the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) extends, and an extent (an extent adjacent to air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3232, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) to which the inside diameter of the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) decreases decreases in the direction in which the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) extends. Regarding claim 5, Cavarretta shows wherein a gradient of an inner surface of the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) relative to a direction in which the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) extends is different (as shown in fig. 4) from a gradient of an inner surface of the air discharge pipe (ANNOTATED, fig. 4) relative to a direction in which the air discharge pipe (ANNOTATED, fig. 4) extends. Regarding claim 7, Cavarretta shows wherein the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]) further comprises a heat exchanger installation portion (installation portion of item 28 where item 31 and item 32 dispose, fig. 3) which is provided in the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) and in which the evaporator (32, fig. 1, [0113]) and the condenser (31, fig. 1, [0113]) are installed, and wherein a length of the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) in a forward/backward direction is less than (ANNOTATED figs. 3, 4) a length of the heat exchanger installation portion (installation portion of item 28 where item 31 and item 32 dispose, fig. 3) in the forward/backward direction. Regarding claim 10, Cavarretta shows further comprising a fan installation portion (installation portion where item 13 disposes, fig. 3) which is coupled to the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) so as to allow the inner case (3, fig. 1) to communicate with the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]) and to circulate air in the laundry treatment space (interior space of item 3, fig. 1). Regarding claim 11, Cavarretta shows wherein the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) comprises: an air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) which extends backwards from the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to guide air in the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4); and an air discharge pipe (ANNOTATED, fig. 4) which extends backwards from the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) to discharge the air in the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) to an outside of the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4), and wherein the fan installation portion (installation portion where item 13 disposes, fig. 3) is coupled to the air discharge pipe (ANNOTATED, fig. 4). Regarding claim 12, Cavarretta shows wherein the base (24, figs. 1, 2, ANNOTATED figs. 3, 4) comprises a compressor installation portion (installation portion of item 24 where item 33 disposes, fig. 1) configured to provide a space in which the compressor (33, fig. 1, [0113]) is installed, and wherein the compressor (33, fig. 1, [0113]) is installed to the compressor installation portion (installation portion of item 24 where item 33 disposes, fig. 1) and is disposed so as to overlap the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) in a width direction (as shown in fig. 4) of the base (24, figs. 1, 2, ANNOTATED figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 14, Cavarretta shows wherein the circulation duct (18, figs. 1, 3, [0111]) and the base (24, figs. 1, 2, ANNOTATED figs. 3, 4) are integrally formed (Cavarretta recites “Preferably, said basement is realized in plastic material and said basement air duct is formed integrally to said basement.”, [0068]). Regarding claim 15, Cavarretta shows wherein the duct body (28, figs. 3, 4) and the air discharge portion (29, figs. 3, 4) are integrally formed (as shown in figs. 3, 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cavarretta as applied to claim 2 above, and in view of Kim et al. (US 2017/0191211; hereinafter Kim). PNG media_image6.png 576 404 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 582 378 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Cavarretta discloses wherein an interior cross-sectional area of the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) decreases (as shown in figs. 3, 4) in a direction in which the air extension pipe (air extension pipe at Q1 and Q2, ANNOTATED fig. 4, fig. 5, which is the same as item 3231, figs. 8, 7, of the instant application) extends. Cavarretta does not disclose an interior cross-sectional area of the air discharge pip (pipe) increases in a direction in which the air discharge pipe extends. Kim teaches an interior cross-sectional area of the air discharge pipe (Kim, ANNOTATED figs. 5, 6A) increases (Kim, as shown in figs. 5, 6A) in a direction in which the air discharge pipe (Kim, ANNOTATED figs. 5, 6A) extends. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to modify the laundry treatment apparatus of Cavarretta with the interior cross-sectional area of the air discharge pip (pipe) increases in a direction in which the air discharge pipe extends, as taught by Kim, for providing an ease of installing a fan or blower to the air discharge pipe which would result in reducing an installation time. Consequently, manufacturing costs are reduced and thus benefit the consumer. Regarding claim 6, Cavarretta discloses the limitations of the laundry treatment apparatus of claim 2 above, but does not disclose wherein an inside diameter of a portion at which the air extension pipe and the air discharge pipe are connected to each other is smallest among inside diameters of other portions of the air extension pipe and the air discharge pipe. Kim teaches wherein an inside diameter of a portion at which the air extension pipe (Kim, 1213, figs. 5, 6A) and the air discharge pipe (Kim, ANNOTATED figs. 5, 6A) are connected to each other is smallest (Kim, ANNOTATED figs. 5, 6A) among inside diameters of other portions of the air extension pipe (Kim, 1213, figs. 5, 6A) and the air discharge pipe (Kim, ANNOTATED figs. 5, 6A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to modify the laundry treatment apparatus of Cavarretta with wherein an inside diameter of a portion at which the air extension pipe and the air discharge pipe are connected to each other is smallest among inside diameters of other portions of the air extension pipe and the air discharge pipe, as taught by Kim, for allowing the air discharge pipe to adapt or couple to a smaller fan or blower with a small inlet diameter which would result in reducing component’s cost. Consequently, manufacturing costs are reduced and thus benefit the consumer. Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cavarretta as applied to claim 2 above, and in view of Kang et al. (US 2020/0141048; hereinafter Kang). PNG media_image8.png 544 442 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claims 8 & 9, Cavarretta discloses the limitations of the laundry treatment apparatus of claim 2 above, but does not disclose wherein the circulation duct further comprises an installation partition wall which projects from an inner lateral surface of the duct body and is disposed in front of the evaporator, and wherein a length of the air extension pipe in a forward/backward direction is less than a distance between the installation partition wall and the air extension pipe; (Application claim 8) and wherein the installation partition wall partially supports a front surface of the evaporator. (Application claim 9) Kang teaches wherein the circulation duct further comprises an installation partition wall (Kang, partition wall at item 30, fig. 2) which projects from an inner lateral surface of the duct body (Kang, body of item 30, fig. 2) and is disposed in front (Kang, right front of item 34, fig. 2) of the evaporator (Kang, 34, fig. 2), and wherein a length of the air extension pipe (Kang, extension pipe between item 32 and item 140, fig. 2) in a forward/backward direction is less than (Kang, as shown in ANNOTATED fig. 2) a distance between the installation partition wall (Kang, partition wall at item 30, fig. 2) and the air extension pipe (Kang, extension pipe between item 32 and item 140, fig. 2); (Application claim 8) and wherein the installation partition wall (Kang, partition wall at item 30, fig. 2) partially supports a front surface (Kang, right front surface of item 34, fig. 2) of the evaporator (Kang 34, fig. 2). (Application claim 9) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to modify the laundry treatment apparatus of Cavarretta with wherein the circulation duct further comprises an installation partition wall which projects from an inner lateral surface of the duct body and is disposed in front of the evaporator, and wherein a length of the air extension pipe in a forward/backward direction is less than a distance between the installation partition wall and the air extension pipe; (Application claim 8) and wherein the installation partition wall partially supports a front surface of the evaporator (Application claim 9), as taught by Kang, for preventing the evaporator from moving during a drying process which would result in preventing the evaporator from getting damage(s). Thus, the lifespan of the evaporator is longer and thus benefits the consumer. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cavarretta as applied to claim 1 above, and in view of Ahn et al. (US 2015/0197882; hereinafter Ahn). PNG media_image9.png 512 252 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 484 388 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 642 454 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 440 420 media_image12.png Greyscale Regarding claim 13, Cavarretta discloses further comprises a controller (Cavarretta recites “Further, laundry dryer 1 may include an electronic central control unit (not shown) which controls both the electrical motor assembly 50 and other components of the dryer 1 to perform, on command, one of the user-selectable drying cycles preferably stored in the same central control unit. …”, UNDERLINE emphasis added, [0107]; thus, the “other components” include the compressor 33) which is provided so as to control the compressor (33, fig. 1, [0113]). Noh does not disclose a controller which is provided in the machine compartment so as to control the compressor, and wherein the air discharge portion is disposed so as to overlap the controller in a height direction of the cabinet. Ahn teaches a controller (Ahn, 160, figs. 3, 5, 6) which is provided in the machine compartment (Ahn, 230, fig. 2) so as to control the compressor (Ahn, 145, figs. 3, 5, 6), and wherein the air discharge portion (Ahn, 135, fig. 5) is disposed so as to overlap the controller (Ahn, 160, figs. 3, 5, 6) in a height direction of the cabinet (Ahn, 200, fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to modify the laundry treatment apparatus of Cavarretta with the controller which is provided in the machine compartment so as to control the compressor, and wherein the air discharge portion is disposed so as to overlap the controller in a height direction of the cabinet, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Shifting the location of the controller does not modify the operation of the laundry treatment apparatus because the laundry treatment apparatus would still control the compressor. Please note, Specification of the instant application does not disclose any criticality of the claim invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5141. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 5712726460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAO D NGUYEN/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762 /MICHAEL G HOANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729478
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR SHOE OR CLOTHING CARE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING OPERATION THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716163
LAUNDRY TREATING APPARATUS
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12692648
GARMENT CARE APPARATUS
6y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690728
DRYING DEVICE TO FACILITATE GLOVE PLACEMENT
5y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12624495
LAUNDRY TREATING APPARATUS
4y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+27.6%)
3y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 371 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month