Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/715,515

SHEET MOLDING COMPOUND AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 31, 2024
Priority
Dec 23, 2021 — JP 2021-209184 +1 more
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
DIC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
999 granted / 1354 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
1399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1354 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner acknowledges pending claims 6-10. Examiner acknowledges cancelled claims 1-5. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 is rendered indefinite because it is unclear where the fibers are oriented before impregnating with resin. It is unclear if the fibers are oriented in a mold or a carrier or a surface. For purposes of examination, Examiner is interpreting the claim to refer to the fibers being oriented in a mold prior to impregnating with resin. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shinoura et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2021/0002436. Regarding claims 6 and 10, Shinoura discloses a sheet molding compound [SMC] [0051]. The abstract of Shinoura discloses that the composite molded article includes resin and fibers. See also [0206-0210]. It is disclosed in paragraph 0031 a SMC having high fiber orientation degree at end portions wherein in the composite molded article has excellent strength. Paragraph 0035 discloses region A as a distance between one point at each of edges of a surface. Paragraph 0193 discloses that the end portions are regions extending 1.0 mm or less [within 20 mm] from both ends is region A [see also Figure 2A]. Paragraph 0323 and Figure 18 disclose fiber tows 203 are oriented at an angle 30 º or less in a direction parallel to the surface of the molded substance wherein Figure 18 shows the fiber tows 203 at the edge of the SMC. Shinoura is silent to the amount of fibers oriented at 30 º or less contained within 20 mm from an edge of the sheet in the amount of 29 to 90%. Paragraph 0031 discloses high fiber orientation degree at end portions provides excellent strength to the composite molded article. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention would optimize the amount of the fibers oriented at 30 º or less contained within 20 mm from an edge of the sheet in the amount of 29 to 90% for the benefit of obtaining a sheet molding compound having enhanced strength. Regarding claim 7, Figure 18 shows fiber tows 203. Paragraph 0323 discloses that fiber tows 203 are oriented at an angle 30 º or less in a direction parallel to the surface of the molded substance. Shinoura is silent to wherein a proportion of reinforcing fibers oriented 30 º or less in a section exceeding 20 mm from the edge is 25 to 40%. Figure 18 shows the fiber tows 203 exceeding 22 mm. Paragraph 0030 discloses that the occurrence of warpage is inhibited in a specific portion of the of the composite molded article. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date would optimize a proportion of reinforcing fibers oriented 30 º or less in a section exceeding 20 mm from the edge is 25 to 40% in order to have enhanced reduction of warpage in the area exceeding the edge of the SMC. PNG media_image1.png 844 364 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, paragraph 0052 discloses carbon fibers [0210]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747325
COMPOSITE MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747328
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN PREPREG AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742047
RESIN COMPOSITION, PREPREG, RESIN-COATED FILM, RESIN-COATED METAL FOIL, METAL-CLADDED LAMINATE BOARD, AND WIRING BOARD
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735817
Knit Fabrics Containing Copper Filaments and Methods of Making Same
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734080
TWO PHASE ABSORBENT COMPOSITES
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.4%)
3y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1354 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month