Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/715,532

IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
May 31, 2024
Examiner
TISSIRE, ABDELAAZIZ
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
584 granted / 693 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
716
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 693 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (lDS) submitted are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and have been considered by the Examiner. Statement of Statutory Basis, 35 U.S.C. §101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101, because the claimed invention is directed to nonstatutory subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 6 is directed to a program per se. Claim 20 explicitly recites “A program for causing an image processing device to execute image processing…” Thus, only a “program” per se is actually claimed with the “image processing device” being intended use. Since a computer program per se “has no physical or tangible form, and thus does not fall within any statutory category” (MPEP 2106.03), claim 12 is nonstatutory under 35 U.S.C. §101. No claim depends on claim 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1, US 20180308217 A1 (KURITA et al.) discloses a white balance adjustment unit configured to adjust white balance of the color polarized image, wherein the demosaicing unit uses the color polarized image subjected to the white balance adjustment to calculate the pixel signal for each of the plurality of polarization components for each color component, and the normal information acquisition unit calculates color difference for each polarization component by using the pixel signal for each color component that is calculated by the demosaicing unit for each polarization component to acquire the normal information on a basis of the calculated color difference for each polarization component (Fig.22, [0105]-[0109]). US 20200350353 A1 (KURITA et al.) discloses detection of the polarization properties of each color even in the case where the degree of polarization varies from one color to another. Also, the polarized pixels of the non-specific colors are allowed to have fewer polarization directions than the polarized pixels of the specific color, so that the deterioration of image quality due to the polarized pixels being configured is reduced (Figs.19-20, [0140]-[0150]). However, the prior art of record taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious the white balance gain calculation unit calculates a white balance gain by using color- corresponding polarization information of a pixel position where polarization degrees of two colors coincide with each other, in combination with all the limitations recited on claim 1. Regarding claims 2-18, are allowable because they are dependent on claim 1. Regarding claim 19, the prior art of record taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious the white balance gain calculation step calculates a white balance gain by using color- corresponding polarization information of a pixel position where polarization degrees of two colors coincide with each other, in combination with all the limitations recited on claim 19. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABDELAAZIZ TISSIRE whose telephone number is (571)270-7204. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 8 AM to 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ye Lin can be reached on 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABDELAAZIZ TISSIRE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593518
IMAGE SENSOR AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587749
CONTROL APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587757
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581204
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581177
CAMERA DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 693 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month