DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1, 5, and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sakakibara (US 9,648,415).
Regarding claim 1, Sakakibara discloses a communication system comprising:
a communication circuit 2 configured to communicate with a vehicle; and
a detection circuit 1 configured to detect speed information associated with a speed of the vehicle, wherein,
based on the speed information, the communication circuit communicates with the vehicle by using a first frequency 210b (high frequency) when the speed is a first speed (less than 20 km/h), and
communicates with the vehicle by using a second frequency 210a (low frequency) lower than the first frequency when the speed is a second speed (exceeds 20 km/h) higher than the first speed (figure 6, column 7, line 49-col. 8, line 35).
Regarding claim 5, Sakakibara discloses a communication method comprising:
detecting 1 speed information associated with a speed of a vehicle;
communicating 2 with the vehicle by using a first frequency 210b (high frequency) when the speed based on the speed information is a first speed (less than 20 km/h); and
communicating with the vehicle by using a second frequency 210a (low frequency) lower than the first frequency when the speed based on the speed information is a second speed (exceeds 20 km/h) higher than the first speed (figure 6, col. 7, line 49-col. 8, line 35).
Regarding claim 6, Sakakibara discloses a tangible and non-transitory storage medium storing a program (col. 4, lines 17-23) causing an information processing device 2 to execute:
processing of detecting speed information 1 associated with a speed of a vehicle;
processing of communicating with the vehicle by using a first frequency 210b (high frequency) when the speed based on the speed information is a first speed (less than 20 km/h); and
processing of communicating with the vehicle by using a second frequency 210a (low frequency) lower than the first frequency when the speed based on the speed information is a second speed (exceeds 20 km/h) higher than the first speed (figure 6, col. 7, line 49-col. 8, line 35).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 2-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sakakibara in view of Hada (US 2012/0059574).
Regarding claims 2-3, Sakakibara discloses all the claimed subject matter as set forth above in the rejection of claim 1, but does not disclose the detection circuit acquiring, from a traffic signal giving an instruction to the vehicle, the speed information associated with the instruction (claim 2); an imaging circuit configured to image the vehicle, wherein the detection circuit acquires the speed information, based on a video of the vehicle imaged by the imaging circuit (claim 3). Hada teaches the use of a detection circuit acquiring, from a traffic signal 14, 18, giving an instruction to a vehicle, speed information associated with the instruction (paragraph 19); an imaging circuit configured to image the vehicle, wherein the detection circuit acquires the speed information, based on a video of the vehicle imaged by the imaging circuit (p. 6, p. 54). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the detection circuit acquiring, from a traffic signal giving an instruction to the vehicle, the speed information associated with the instruction; an imaging circuit configured to image the vehicle, wherein the detection circuit acquires the speed information, based on a video of the vehicle imaged by the imaging circuit to the system of Sakakibara as taught by Hada for the purpose of effectively detecting speed information of the vehicle.
Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sakakibara in view of Koshizen (US 2016/0314687).
Regarding claim 4, Sakakibara discloses all the claimed subject matter as set forth above in the rejection of claim 1, but does not disclose a location information acquisition circuit configured to acquire location information of the vehicle, wherein the detection circuit acquires the speed information, based on the location information of the vehicle acquired by the location information acquisition circuit. Koshizen teaches the use of a location information acquisition circuit 13 configured to acquire location information of a vehicle, (S32, figure 11, p. 46), wherein a detection circuit 20 acquires speed information, based on the location information of the vehicle acquired by the location information acquisition circuit (figures 1, 9, and 11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a location information acquisition circuit configured to acquire location information of the vehicle, wherein the detection circuit acquires the speed information, based on the location information of the vehicle acquired by the location information acquisition circuit to the system of Sakakibara as taught by Koshizen for the purpose of effectively detecting speed information of the vehicle.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Durie and Lei disclose vehicle monitoring systems.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH V LA whose telephone number is (571)272-2970. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ANH V LA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685
ANH V. LA
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2685
Al
January 2, 2026
Prosecution Insights