Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/715,819

HYDRAULIC MODULE, IN PARTICULAR FOR GENERATING PRESSURE AND/OR CONTROLLING PRESSURE IN A SLIP-CONTROLLABLE BRAKE SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND MOUNTING METHOD FOR A HYDRAULIC MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — DE 10 2022 202 162.2 +1 more
Examiner
WIBLIN, MATTHEW
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
489 granted / 655 resolved
+4.7% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/20/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Claims 9-12 and 14-16 remain(s) pending in the application. Applicant's amendments to the Claims are responsive to the rejections previously set forth in the Final Office Action dated 03/25/2026, hereinafter FOA_2. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tsubouchi, Kaoru et al. US 20050044852 A1, hereinafter Tsubouchi, have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Claims 9 and 14 were amended to comprise additional elements such as “the guide element includes a slot that runs diagonally with respect to a longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module”. These elements continue to be taught by Tsubouchi. See rejection below for further details. Applicant’s arguments, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 16 under Tsubouchi, in view of Bacon; Bradley US 6722011 B1, hereinafter Bacon, have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Claims 9 and 14 were amended to comprise additional elements such as “the guide element includes a slot that runs diagonally with respect to a longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module”. These elements continue to be taught by Tsubouchi. See rejection below for further details. Claim Interpretation Claim 9 Ln 11-13 states “a circumferential guide gap, which is sealed toward the working chamber by a seal assembly is arranged between a circumference of the piston and a wall of the cylinder bore”. The bold term has been interpreted as a positively recited component of the module. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9-12 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsubouchi. Regarding claim 9, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) a hydraulic module for generating and/or controlling a brake pressure in a slip- controllable vehicle brake system, the hydraulic module comprising: a housing block (1) in which a cylinder bore (2) is formed; a piston (5) of a piston pressure generator accommodated in the cylinder bore and delimiting a working chamber (11); and a transmission (“booster of a vacuum booster device”, [0016]) by which the piston can be driven to perform an axial movement in a pressure increase direction (as depicted to the left) and in a pressure decrease direction (as depicted to the right) opposite to the pressure increase direction, wherein a volume of the working chamber decreases when the piston moves in the pressure increase direction, and increases when the piston is driven in the pressure lowering direction (as depicted, when the piston is driven leftwards, the volume of the working chamber decreases, and when the piston is driven rightwards, the volume of the working chamber increases); wherein a circumferential guide gap (the depicted gap between (5) and (2)), which is sealed toward the working chamber by a seal assembly (13, 17) is arranged between a circumference of the piston and a wall of the cylinder bore [0016]; and a guide element (23) is provided on a side of the seal assembly that faces away from the working chamber (as depicted, to the right of (13), wherein, with the guide element, the piston can be circumferentially radially supported in the cylinder bore [0018, 0024], wherein the guide element is accommodated in a receiving groove (22) on the wall of the cylinder bore in such a way that the guide element projects radially in part into the guide gap (depicted as projecting into the gap to contact the piston), wherein the receiving groove (22) is stepped at a right angle in its cross section from an outside to an inside and forms circumferential abutment shoulders (101, as depicted the circumferential parts are perpendicular to the axial portions of the shoulders), wherein the guide element (23) is supported at an axial edge (103) on the abutment shoulders, wherein a narrower groove portion (81) located radially outward of the abutment shoulders is separated from the guide gap and is configured to supply pressure medium to a rear side of the guide element facing away from the piston [0020], and wherein the guide element includes a slot (24) that runs perpendicularly with respect to a longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module [0018]. (Below are Fig. 1 and an enlarged view (X2) of Fig. 1 similar to that of the applicant’s Fig. 1 and view X/Fig. 2 for comparison. As can be seen, abutment shoulders (101) and axial edges (103) of Tsubouchi is near identical to applicant’s (48). Furthermore, the axial edges of Tsubouchi are depicted as supporting guide element (23) at the serpentine shapes axial most portions.) PNG media_image1.png 1446 1125 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 1504 1068 media_image2.png Greyscale Tsubouchi fails to explicitly state that the slot runs diagonally with respect to the longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module. Since applicant has not disclosed that having the slot running diagonally solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose, and it appears that the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi would perform equally well with the slot running diagonally as claimed by applicant, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to modify the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi by utilizing the slot running diagonally as claimed for the purpose of enabling the insertion of the guide element into the receiving groove/cylinder bore. Regarding claim 10, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) the guide element is a form- elastic, singly slotted annular element with two free and opposite ends ((24), [0018]). Regarding claim 11, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) the guide element includes PTFE or a brake-fluid-resistant plastic (“aromatic polyamide nylon or the like” [0018]). Regarding claim 12, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) the receiving groove (22) is arranged between a first seal assembly (13) of the seal assembly directly facing the working chamber, and a second seal assembly (17) of the seal assembly far from the working chamber. Regarding claim 15, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) the guide element (23) is accommodated with axial play in the receiving groove ((23) is depicted as having space within (22) by which axial movement is allowed). Regarding claim 14, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) a hydraulic module for generating and/or controlling a brake pressure in a slip- controllable vehicle brake system, the hydraulic module comprising: a housing block (1) in which a cylinder bore (2) is formed; a piston (5) of a piston pressure generator accommodated in the cylinder bore and delimiting a working chamber (11); and a transmission (“booster of a vacuum booster device”, [0016]) by which the piston can be driven to perform an axial movement in a pressure increase direction (as depicted to the left) and in a pressure decrease direction (as depicted to the right) opposite to the pressure increase direction, wherein a volume of the working chamber decreases when the piston moves in the pressure increase direction, and increases when the piston is driven in the pressure lowering direction (as depicted, when the piston is driven leftwards, the volume of the working chamber decreases, and when the piston is driven rightwards, the volume of the working chamber increases); wherein a circumferential guide gap (the depicted gap between (5) and (2)), which is sealed toward the working chamber by a seal assembly (13, 17) is arranged between a circumference of the piston and a wall of the cylinder bore [0016]; and a guide element (23) is provided on a side of the seal assembly that faces away from the working chamber (as depicted, to the right of (13)), wherein, with the guide element, the piston can be circumferentially radially supported in the cylinder bore [0018, 0024], wherein the guide element is accommodated in a receiving groove (22) on the wall of the cylinder bore in such a way that the guide element projects radially in part into the guide gap (depicted as projecting into the gap to contact the piston), wherein the receiving groove (22) is stepped in its cross section from an outside to an inside and forms inner abutment shoulders, on which the guide element can be radially supported (as depicted, the groove (22) has a stepped annular groove portion (81) thereby forming the depicted shoulders upon which (23) rests)), wherein the receiving groove (22) is stepped in its cross section from an outside to an inside and forms inner abutment shoulders, on which the guide element can be radially supported (as depicted, the groove (22) has a stepped annular groove portion (81) thereby forming the depicted shoulders upon which (23) rests)), wherein a groove portion (81) of the receiving groove (22) that is formed between the abutment shoulder and a groove bottom (depicted radial outward surface of (81) is connected to a pressure-medium-conducting region (36) at the atmospheric pressure in the housing block such that pressure medium flows to a rear side of the guide element that faces away from the piston [0020], and wherein the guide element includes a slot (24) that runs perpendicularly with respect to a longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module [0018]. Tsubouchi fails to explicitly state that the slot runs diagonally with respect to the longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module. Since applicant has not disclosed that having the slot running diagonally solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose, and it appears that the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi would perform equally well with the slot running diagonally as claimed by applicant, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to modify the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi by utilizing the slot running diagonally as claimed for the purpose of enabling the insertion of the guide element into the receiving groove/cylinder bore. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsubouchi, in view of Bacon. The references is/are considered analogous art to the claimed invention because the references is/are from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention (braking master cylinders (Tsubouchi)); or the references is/are reasonably pertinent to the problem faced by the inventor (guide sleeve installation (both)). MPEP2141.01(a) I. Regarding claim 16, Tsubouchi discloses (Fig. 1, 3) a mounting method for a hydraulic module (interpreted as intended use), comprising the following steps: providing a housing block (1) having a cylinder bore (2) formed therein, and a receiving groove (22) for a guide element (23) in an interior of this cylinder bore; inserting the guide element into the mounting sleeve [0018]; wherein the receiving groove (22) is stepped at a right angle in its cross section from an outside to an inside and forms circumferential abutment shoulders (101), wherein the guide element is radially supported at an axial edge (103) on the abutment shoulders after snapping into the receiving groove, and wherein the guide element includes a slot (24) that runs perpendicularly with respect to a longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module [0018]. (above are Fig. 1 and an enlarged view (X2) of Fig. 1 similar to that of the applicant’s Fig. 1 and view X/Fig. 2 for comparison. As can be seen, abutment shoulders (101) and axial edges (103) of Tsubouchi is near identical to applicant’s (48). Furthermore, the axial edges of Tsubouchi are depicted as supporting guide element (23) at the serpentine shapes axial most portions in its installed/snapped in configuration.) Tsubouchi fails to explicitly state that the slot runs diagonally with respect to the longitudinal axis of the hydraulic module. Since applicant has not disclosed that having the slot running diagonally solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose, and it appears that the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi would perform equally well with the slot running diagonally as claimed by applicant, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to modify the slot running perpendicularly of Tsubouchi by utilizing the slot running diagonally as claimed for the purpose of enabling the insertion of the guide element into the receiving groove/cylinder bore. Tsubouchi further fails to explicitly state that the method further comprises inserting a mounting sleeve into the cylinder bore; applying a directed propelling force in a direction of a longitudinal direction of the cylinder bore to the guide element until the guide element exits the mounting sleeve at an opposite end and snaps into the receiving groove. Bacon discloses (Fig. 1-4) a mounting method for a hydraulic module (interpreted as intended use), comprising the following steps: providing a housing block (110) having a cylinder bore (150)formed therein, and a receiving groove (170) for a guide element (200) in an interior of this cylinder bore; inserting a mounting sleeve (426) into the cylinder bore (depicted as inserted in Fig. 1, Col 7 Ln 31-43); inserting the guide element into the mounting sleeve (Fig. 4A, Col 7 Ln 23-30); and applying a directed propelling force in a direction of a longitudinal direction of the cylinder bore to the guide element until the guide element exits the mounting sleeve at an opposite end and snaps into the receiving groove (Fig. 4B-C, Col 7 Ln 23-30, Col 8 Ln 59-Col 9 Ln 4). Bacon further discloses it is extremely difficult to insert a guide element into a receiving groove of a cylinder bore and by providing the mounting sleeve and mounting method overcome that difficulty (Col 1 Ln 39-36). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was filed, to modify Tsubouchi, by providing the mounting sleeve and mounting method, as taught by Bacon, for the purpose of inserting a guide element into a receiving groove of a cylinder bore. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW WIBLIN whose telephone number is (571)272-9836. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at 571-272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW WIBLIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Nov 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747559
Electric Working Machine
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735863
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728831
FLUID PRESSURE SUPPLY APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729701
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM WITH COOLING CIRCUIT AND MACHINE TOOL
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722687
A REDUNDANT HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.4%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month