Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/715,830

TIMELINE BASED REPRESENTATION FOR HAPTIC SIGNAL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Examiner
SHIH, HAOSHIAN
Art Unit
2179
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings SAS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
375 granted / 545 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-9 and 20-25 are pending in this application and have been examined in response to application filed on 06/03/2024. CONTINUING DATA: This application is a 371 of PCT/EP2022/081123 11/08/2022 FOREIGN APPLICATIONS: EP 21306693.9 12/02/2021, EP 22305295.2 03/15/2022 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 4, 7, 20 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 4, 7, 20 and 23 recite the limitation "…a list of references…a temporal reference… associated to a reference". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because it is unclear what “a reference” is being referred back to. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 7, 20 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Jun et al. (US 2016/0139671 A1). As to INDEPENDENT claim 1, Jun discloses a method comprising: generating haptic data comprising information representative of: a type of effect (fig.7D; different haptic patterns are displayed), a library of haptic effects, wherein a haptic effect is identified by a reference and comprises information representative of values of a signal to be applied to render the haptic effect (fig.7D; a list of haptic effect is displayed, each haptic effect is identifiable by name and waveform pattern), and a list of haptic tracks, wherein a haptic track comprises a timeline, wherein the timeline comprises a list of references of haptic effects of the library of haptic effects, and wherein a temporal reference is associated to a reference (fig.7D; fig.29A; a list of haptic effect tracks is displayed, wherein each haptic pattern is represented by a strength over time graph and each haptic effect graph is referenced and identifiable by name). As to INDEPENDENT claim 4, Jun discloses a method for rendering haptic data comprising: obtaining haptic data comprising information representative of: a type of effect (fig.7D; different haptic patterns are displayed), a library of haptic effects, wherein a haptic effect is identified by a reference and comprises information representative of values of a signal to be applied to render the haptic effect (fig.7D; a list of haptic effect is displayed, each haptic effect is identifiable by name and waveform pattern), and a list of haptic tracks, wherein a haptic track comprises a timeline, wherein the timeline comprises a list of references of haptic effects of the library of haptic effects, and wherein a temporal reference is associated to a reference fig.7D; fig.29A; a list of haptic effect tracks is displayed, wherein each haptic pattern is represented by a strength over time graph and each haptic effect graph is referenced and identifiable by name), and providing values of the signal to haptic actuators (fig.23; haptic signal is generated). INDEPENDENT claim 7 is a device variation of claim 4, therefore claim 7 is rejected under the same rational addressed in the rejection of claim 4 above. Claim 20 is a non-transitory computer readable storage medium variation of claim 1, therefore claim 20 is rejected under the same rational addressed in the rejection of claim 1 above. Claim 23 is a non-transitory computer readable storage medium variation of claim 4, therefore claim 23 is rejected under the same rational addressed in the rejection of claim 4 above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 5-6, 8-9, 22 and 24-25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 2-3, 5-6, 8-9, 22 and 24-25 are allowable because the prior art does not expressly disclose wherein signals and time lines are grouped according to a set of frequency bands. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAOSHIAN SHIH whose telephone number is (571)270-1257. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FRED EHICHIOYA can be reached at (571) 272-4034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAOSHIAN SHIH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2179
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597186
SYNTHESIZING SHADOWS IN DIGITAL IMAGES UTILIZING DIFFUSION MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591329
REDUCED-SIZE INTERFACES FOR MANAGING ALERTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578832
DISTANCE-BASED USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572325
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PLAYING SOUND EFFECTS OF MUSIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561039
GENERATIVE MODEL WITH WHITEBOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month