Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/715,855

HOLLOW PARTICLES, RESIN COMPOSITION, AND RESIN MOLDED BODY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Priority
Dec 10, 2021 — JP 2021-201030 +1 more
Examiner
LE, HOA T
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Zeon Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
787 granted / 1084 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1134
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1084 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WATANABE (US-2022/0355264). Claim 1: Watanabe teaches hollow particles which comprise a shell containing a resin and a hollow portion surrounded by the shell, wherein a void ratio of the hollow particles is 50% or more; wherein, as the resin, the shell contains a polymer which contains 90% by mass or more of hydrocarbon monomer units (para. 0097) which meets the claimed range of 91% by mass or more, and 70% by mass or more of crosslinkable monomer units (para. 0092) which meets the claimed range of 50% by mass or more. Watanabe does not report the “residual double bond ratio of the polymer” and the “dielectric dissipation factor of the hollow particles”; however, the process of making hollow particles of Watanabe is substantially identical to the method disclosed in the instant specification, which comprises 5 process steps: (1) Mixture Liquid preparation; (2) suspension; (3) polymerization; (4) solid-liquid separation; and (5) solvent removal step. Compare the disclosure of Watanabe at paragraphs [0055] to [0065] and [0074]-[0076], [0143]-[0147],[0159]-[0161], [0164]-[0166] and [0168]-[0170] to the instant specification at paragraphs [0024], [0050]-[0051], [0053], [0055] and [0057]. In addition, the process of Watanabe utilizes the same processing aids such as organic peroxide for polymerization initiator (Watanabe, para. 0116; instant specification,para.,0041-0042) hydrophobic solvents (Watanabe, para. 0120-0121; instant specification, para. 0020, 0022 ). Therefore, it is expected that the hollow particles of Watanabe would exhibit the same residual double bond ratio and dielecric dissipation factor as claimed. Claim 2: As stated in claim 1 above, because Watanabe’s process is substantially identical to the process of the claimed invention using the same processing aids, it is expected that the relative permittity of the hollow particles of Watanabe is the same as that of the claimed invention. Claim 3: Watanabe reports the void ratio being 60 to 90% (para. 0202) which falls within the claimed range of 65% or more. Claim 4: Watanabe reports the volume average particle diameter of the hollow particles being 4 to 10 mm (para. 0198) which falls within the claimed range of 1.0 µm to 10.0 µm Claims 5-6: Watanabe teaches forming a resin composition comprising the hollow particles and a matrix resin and molded body thereof (para. 0229). Claim 7: Watanabe teaches hollow particles comprising a content of crosslinkable hydrocarbon monomer units is 70% by mass or more in the shell polymer (para. 0092) which meets the claimed range of 50% by mass or more. Claim 8: Watanabe teaches the hollow particles containing non-crosslinkable hydrocarbon monomer units in a content of 10% to 30% by mass in the shell polymer (para. 0092) which is well within the claimed range of 2% to 50% by mass. Claim 9: Watanabe does not report the content of metal in the hollow particles; however, the Watanabe process utilizes the same metal salt as dispersion stabilizer, namely magnesium hydroxide (Watanabe, para. 0019; instant specification, para. 0043) in the same process as that of the claimed invention as discussed in claim 1 above. Therefore, it is expected that the hollow particles of Watanabe possesses the same content of metal as claimed. Claims 10-11: As stated in claim 1 above, , because Watanabe’s process is substantially identical to the process of the claimed invention using the same processing aids, it is expected that the resin molded body comprising the hollow particles of Watanabe would exhibit the same dielectric dissipation factor and relative permittivity as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOA (Holly) LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOA (Holly) LE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /HOA (Holly) LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637601
ABRASIVE ARTICLE INCLUDING SHAPED ABRASIVE PARTICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630695
RESIN COMPOSITION, ACOUSTIC MEMBER, ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER, ULTRASOUND PROBE, AND ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624221
COMPOSITION FOR COATING AN OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624727
Ceramic Ball Material comprising a band-portion over surface of a spherical portion, and Method For Manufacturing Ceramic Ball
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624728
CERAMIC BALL MATERIAL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CERAMIC BALL USING SAME, AND CERAMIC BALL
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1084 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month