Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/716,215

FLUID TRANSPORT PIPE HAVING A STEEL TUBE WITH A PROTECTIVE LINING PROVIDED WITH SLOTS FOR DISCHARGING GAS BUILT UP UNDER THE LINING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Dec 17, 2021 — FR 21 13893 +1 more
Examiner
LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Saipem S.p.a.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
3 granted / 3 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
14
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
85.3%
+45.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 3 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings were received on 06/04/2024. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “partially” in claim 14 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “partially” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The term "partially" renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear the degree and corresponding structure for which the slot is "closed between the inner face and outer face". Claims 15-26 are rejected by virtue of their dependence upon claim 14. Claims 18 and 21, line 2 iterate “an outer opening and an inner opening” of the lining. The duplicate recitation defining an outer and inner opening of the lining renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear if these recitations are referring to the same element or an entirely different element than previously stated in claim 15, lines 2-3. Claim 19 recites the limitation "the perpendicular bisector" in line 2 and “the two non-parallel sides” in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-26 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not disclose or reasonably suggest the pipeline for the transport of fluids having the combination of features set forth in independent claim 1 US 20210156496 to Chalmers et. al., US 20180320452 to Adkins, and US 20180306200 to Boulden et. al. may be seen as close prior art in certain aspects but fail to expressly teach the polymer annular lining in a steel tube for fluid transport having elongated slots extending in length parallel to the longitudinal axis of the lining. They teach non-metallic/polymer lining comprising holes being inserted into a steel pipe for fluid transport but fails to suggest or teach the structure of slots of the present invention as set forth in claim 14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA DENNIS LEARY whose telephone number is (571)272-1685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571-272-3607. If Craig Schneider cannot be reached, please contact Kenneth Rinehart 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA D LEARY/Examiner, Art Unit 3753 /CRAIG M SCHNEIDER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 3 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month