Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/716,830

SCREEN PROJECTION METHOD, SCREEN PROJECTION DEVICE, SCREEN PROJECTION DISPLAY DEVICE, SCREEN PROJECTION SYSTEM AND MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 05, 2024
Priority
Dec 06, 2021 — CN 202111478547.9 +1 more
Examiner
MONTOYA, OSCHTA I
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Bytedance Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
404 granted / 566 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 566 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/08/2026 has been entered. Claim Objections Claims 14, 16 and 18 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claims 11, 12 and 17. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 11-12, 14 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 11 and claim 14 are the same; claim 12 and claim 16 are the same ; and claim 16 and claim 17 are the same. Applicant may cancel the claims, amend the claims to place the claims in proper dependent form, rewrite the claims in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claims complies with the statutory requirements. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSCHTA I MONTOYA whose telephone number is (571)270-1192. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached on 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. OSCHTA I. MONTOYA Examiner Art Unit 2421 OM Oschta Montoya Patent Examiner Art Unit 2421 /OSCHTA I MONTOYA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749371
AUTOMATED COMPUTER GAME APPLICATION CLASSIFICATION BASED ON A MIXED EFFECTS MODEL
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750277
FACILITATING STREAMING IN A LOCAL NETWORK WITH A CLIENT-SERVER ARCHITECTURE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750617
CAMERA MICROPHONE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR BEAMFORMING
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728362
OMNIDIRECTIONAL LOCOMOTION SYSTEM WITH FULL RANGE OF MOTION IN MULTIPLE DEGREES OF FREEDOM FOR WALKABLE OR INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL REALITY
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728341
HYBRID GOLF SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC SCORING USING USER'S MOBILE TERMINAL IN THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 566 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month