Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/717,045

MULTI-LAYER STRUCTURES COMPRISING SILANE COUPLING AGENTS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Examiner
AHMED, SHEEBA
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dow Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
890 granted / 1105 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1142
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1105 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment 2. The preliminary amendment filed on June 6, 2024 has been entered in the above-identified application. Claims 2-4, 8-15 are amended. Claims 1-15 are pending and under consideration. Claim Objections 3. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites “5 to 100 wt.% of terpolymer represented by the formula of E/V/W, wherein E is ethylene, V is an acrylic ester commoner selected from vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, or maleic anhydride mono ester, and W is a functional group selected from an epoxy, maleic anhydride, and a carboxyl group” however the word “commoner” should be “comonomer”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 4. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 1 recites “a multi-layer structure comprising at least one polyvinyl chloride (PVC) layer, at least one metal layer, and at least one tie layer adhering the steel layer to the PVC layer…” however there is no antecedent basis for “the steel layer” in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Case et al. (US 5209983). Case et al. disclose adhesives suitable for preparing laminates of polyvinyl chloride or polyvinyl chloride copolymers with wood or metal (equivalent to the multi-layer structure comprising at least one polyvinyl chloride (PVC) layer and at least one metal layer as recited in claim 1 and meeting the limitations of claim 15) and the adhesives are prepared from a polymer mixture of polyvinyl chloride or its copolymers itself, a direct ethylene copolymer preferably containing units derived from carbon monoxide, and another direct ethylene copolymer containing units derived from a monomer containing glycidyl units. The adhesive comprises (a) 5-65 weight percent of polyvinyl chloride or a polyvinyl chloride copolymer; (b) 15-75 weight percent of a first ethylene copolymer, said first copolymer being a direct copolymer containing 30-95 weight percent ethylene and (i) from 0-50 weight percent of a moiety derived from a comonomer consisting of at least one alkyl acrylate, alkyl methacrylate, alkyl vinyl ether, vinyl acetate or mixtures thereof where the alkyl radical contains 1-8 carbon atoms, and also containing (ii) 0-20 weight percent of a moiety derived from a comonomer consisting of carbon monoxide or sulfur dioxide (equivalent to the 0 to 95 wt.% of at least one ethylene acrylate copolymer, wherein the acrylate is selected from vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, or maleic anhydride mono ester; as recited in claim 1 and meeting the limitations of claim 10) and (c) 2-25 weight percent of a second ethylene copolymer, said second copolymer being a direct copolymer containing from 0-50 weight percent of a moiety derived from at least one alkyl acrylate, alkyl methacrylate, alkyl vinyl ether, vinyl acetate or mixtures thereof where the alkyl radical contains 1-8 carbon atoms, and also containing 1-15 weight percent of a moiety derived from glycidyl acrylate, glycidyl methacrylate or glycidyl vinyl ether (equivalent to the 5 to 100 wt.% of terpolymer represented by the formula of E/V/W, wherein E is ethylene, V is an acrylic ester commoner selected from vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, or maleic anhydride mono ester, and W is a functional group selected from an epoxy, maleic anhydride, and a carboxyl group as recited in claim 1). The second ethylene copolymer may have a comonomer which is selected from the same group of monomers (i) as those in the first copolymer, namely alkyl acrylates, methacrylates or vinyl ethers and vinyl acetate, and may by present in amounts up to about 50 weight percent. The second copolymer must have a comonomer containing a glycidyl group such comonomers are glycidyl acrylate, glycidyl methacrylate and glycidyl vinyl ether. This monomer may be present at levels between 1 and 15 weight percent, preferably from 3-11 weight percent. The preferred second copolymers are terpolymers, and the preferred terpolymer is ethylene/n-butyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate containing from 10-40 percent n-butyl acrylate and 3-11 percent glycidyl methacrylate (meeting the limitations of claims 9, 11, 12, and 13). The amount of each of the three components of the adhesive can vary widely. In making the laminate of PVC or PVC copolymer with a wood or a metal laminate co-layer, it is preferable to pre-treat the wood or metal substrate with a silane solution. This is a well-known procedure and is particularly useful when the laminates are subject to a moist environment. Typical silanes for this purposes are amino-functional silanes, particularly amino trialkoxy silanes, for example aminotriethoxy silane (equivalent to the silane coupling agent disposed on the tie layer, applied as a primer layer onto the PVC layer and equivalent to the structure of claim 1 and the silanes used in the Examples of the instant application and meeting the limitations of claim 2, 4, and 8). With regards to claim 14, the ranges taught by Case et al. include the claimed ranges for the ethylene acrylate copolymer and the terpolymer. (See Abstract and Column 1, lines 64-68, Column 2, lines 1-29, Column 3, lines 22-68, Column 4, lines 1-15, 22-27, 36-43, and Examples). All limitations of claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-15 are taught in the above reference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claims 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Case et al. (US 5209983). With regards to the limitation that the primer layer is applied at an amount of 0.01 to 100 g/m² and the tie layer comprises from 0.01 to 10 wt.% silane coupling agent, the Examiner takes the position that workable physical properties and concentrations are deemed to be obvious routine optimizations to one of ordinary skill in the art, motivated by the desire to obtain the required properties. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEEBA AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-1504. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CALLIE SHOSHO can be reached at 571-272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEEBA AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600883
PROCESS TO SYNTHESIZE/INTEGRATE DURABLE/ROBUST LOW SURFACE ENERGY "HYDROPHOBIC" DROPWISE CONDENSATION PROMOTER COATINGS ON METAL AND METAL OXIDE SURFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594750
TEXTILE FABRIC AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595362
Polypropylene Resin Composition with Excellent Flame Retardancy and Formability
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590365
HYDROPHILIC ANTI FOG FILM LAYER, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION AND PRODUCT THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590196
LAMINATED FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1105 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month