Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/717,161

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SENSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SL DRX IN NR V2X

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2021 — provisional 63/291,958 +3 more
Examiner
RIVAS, RAUL
Art Unit
2471
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
405 granted / 484 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
532
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
65.3%
+25.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 484 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the application filed on 06/06/2024. The claims 16-20 have been canceled by the applicant. The claims 21-25 have been newly added by the applicant. Claim Objections Claim 25 is objected to because of the following informalities: The number on claim 25 is not correct, it seems that it should be claim 1 and all the other subsequent claims 2-13 appear to be directly or indirectly dependent of claim 1. For purpose of examination and to expedite the process of examination of the application, the Examiner has considered the error a typo and has examined the claims as such. Appropriate correction is required for the next set of claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 14, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (U.S. Pub. 20230292395) in view of LG Electronics, "Discussion on resource allocation for power saving," R1-2109860, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, Meeting #106bis-e, e-Meeting, hereafter “LGElec”. Regarding claim 1 Han disclose, a method for performing wireless communication by a first device, the method comprising: obtaining a sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration including information related to an active time para. 5, “receiving a first signaling, which indicates a first SL DRX configuration… the DRX configuration including parameters such as on-duration, off-duration, and wake-up time”; obtaining a first reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold for resource selection within the active time para. 60, “The BS may further use the RRC parameter to control the UEs to transmit the SL DRX configuration by threshold. More specifically, the BS can configure a threshold which is broadcasted together with other system information, for channel condition, reference signal receiving power (RSRP)”; obtaining a second RSRP threshold for resource selection para. 5, “to a receiving UE, a second signaling which indicates a second SL DRX configuration, wherein the second SL DRX configuration is determined based on the first SL DRX configuration”. Han does not specifically disclose, triggering resource selection in a slot; determining, based on the resource selection being triggered, a selection window; determining, based on the first RSRP threshold, at least one first candidate resource within the active time within the selection window; determining, based on the second RSRP threshold, at least one second candidate resource within the selection window; and selecting a transmission resource among the at least one first candidate resource and the at least one second candidate resource, based on that (i) a number of the at least one first candidate resource is greater than or equal to a first threshold and (ii) a number of the at least one second candidate resource is greater than or equal to a second threshold. However, LGElec teach, triggering resource selection in a slot “the resource (re)selection is triggered at slot n”; see page 4, determining, based on the resource selection being triggered, a selection window page 2, “For a resource (re)selection procedure triggered by periodic transmission (Prsvp_TX≠0) in slot n. A set of candidate resource (SA) is initialized to the set of selected Y candidate slots of PBPS”; determining, based on the first RSRP threshold, at least one first candidate resource within the active time within the selection window page 8, “The remaining number of candidate slots can be selected from the SL DRX inactive time. For this, the target resource ratio, the RSRP threshold and the RSRP offset related to the idle resource identification in the resource (re)selection procedure can be commonly or separately (pre-)configured to the SL DRX”; determining, based on the second RSRP threshold, at least one second candidate resource within the selection window page 8, “The remaining number of candidate slots can be selected from the SL DRX inactive time. For this, the target resource ratio, the RSRP threshold and the RSRP offset related to the idle resource identification in the resource (re)selection procedure can be commonly or separately (pre-)configured to the SL DRX”; and selecting a transmission resource among the at least one first candidate resource and the at least one second candidate resource page 8, “For example, in selecting min. Y candidate resources, a (pre-)configured number of candidate resources can be selected from the SL DRX ON duration or active time within a resource selection window”, based on that (i) a number of the at least one first candidate resource is greater than or equal to a first threshold page. 5, “For aperiodic transmission, when the resource (re)selection is triggered at slot n, the contiguous partial sensing on [n+TA, n+TB] is determined as follows” read as: T A = t y 0 - W C P S > 0 and (ii) a number of the at least one second candidate resource is greater than or equal to a second threshold “for the second number is determined as follows” read as: “ T B = t y 0 - T p r o c , 0 - T p r o c , 1 ≥ T A + W C P S m i n ”. Han and LGElec are analogous because they pertain to the field of wireless communication and, more specifically, to transmission parameters. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of LGElec in the system of Han so the system can accurately schedule the best resource selection based on the current medium conditions. The motivation for doing so would have been to ensure the system is efficiently configuring and selecting the parameters to avoid delays. Claim 14 recites an apparatus corresponding to the method of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 15 the limitations of claim 15 are rejected in the same manner as analyzed above with respect to claim 1. Claim(s) 2 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (U.S. Pub. 20230292395) in view of LG Electronics, "Discussion on resource allocation for power saving," R1-2109860, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, Meeting #106bis-e, e-Meeting, hereafter “LGElec”, further in view of Lee et al. (U.S. Pub. 20220217655). Regarding claim 2, Han and LGElec, do not specifically disclose further comprising: obtaining a first offset for increasing the first RSRP threshold and a second offset for increasing the second RSRP threshold. However, Lee teach, obtaining a first offset for increasing the first RSRP threshold para. 168, “the RSRP may be determined by adding the first offset to a RSRP measurement value of the DM-RS” and a second offset for increasing the second RSRP threshold para. 169, “the RSRP may be determined by adding a second offset determined based on the first offset to a RSRP measurement value of the DM-RS”. Han, LGElec and Lee are analogous because they pertain to the field of wireless communication and, more specifically, to transmission parameters. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lee in the system of LGElec and Han to be able to prevent unnecessary back and forth handovers and frequent radio measurement reports. The motivation for doing so would have been to ensure the system can maintain a stable load balancing and reduce congestion during transmission windows. Regarding claim 21 the limitations of claim 21 are rejected in the same manner as analyzed above with respect to claim 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-13 and 22-25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAUL RIVAS whose telephone number is (571)270–5590. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, from 8:30am to 5:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Sujoy K. Kundu, can be reached on (571) 272 - 8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571–273–8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair–direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866–217–9197 (toll–free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800–786–9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571–272–1000. /RR/ Examiner, Art Unit 2471 /SUJOY K KUNDU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739675
UE BASED PDCCH MONITORING ADAPTATION DURING SDT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12713434
Methods And Apparatus For Disabling Of Option 1 Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Feedback For Sidelink Communication
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706778
PACKET PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12684560
METHOD OF TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION AND APPARATUS FOR SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677135
RADIO PARAMETER DETECTION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 8m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 484 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month