Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/717,926

ANOMALY DETECTION IN NETWORKED ENTITIES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Priority
Dec 08, 2021 — GB 2117723.3 +1 more
Examiner
JAKOVAC, RYAN J
Art Unit
2445
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Senseon Tech Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
404 granted / 615 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
651
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
87.3%
+47.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 615 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 USC 101 because the claimed invention is directed towards non-statutory subject matter. The claims the following features which are types of mental processes that can be performed in the human mind, or by a human using a pen and paper and which are representative of data gathering and/or making observations: “applying anomaly detection to the set of observations to compute an anomaly score”. The claims recite mathematical concepts describing a judicial exception such as “structuring the observation anomaly scores as a data matrix…”; “identifying at least one time period of the data matrix as anomalous”; “extracting causal information about the at least one time period”; “the angular relationship between a second-pass coordinate vector of the at least one time period and a second-pass coordinate vector of at least one entity of the set of networked entities”; “the second-pass coordinate vectors determined by applying a second-pass singular value decomposition (SVD) to a residuals matrix”; “the residuals matrix computed between the data matrix and an approximation of the data matrix by applying a first-pass truncated SVD to the data matrix”. The judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. The claim(s) include(s) additional elements such as “receiving a set of observations…”. The judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the additional elements simply merely perform the generic computer function of data gathering - MPEP 2106.05(g). The claim(s) include(s) additional elements such as “a computer system…”; “one or more processors”; “memory” (see claim 14); and “non-transitory computer readable medium” (see claim 21). The judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the additional limitations are no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using generic computing components. Accordingly, the additional elements do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application because they do not impose any meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. The additional elements do not amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the additional elements when considered alone and in combination do not add significantly more (i.e. do not at an inventive concept) to the exception. The remaining claims are addressed by similar rationale as above. CONCLUSION The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 20200021496. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN J JAKOVAC whose telephone number is (571)270-5003. The examiner can normally be reached on 8-4 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oscar A. Louie can be reached on 572-270-1684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN J JAKOVAC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2445
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641101
EXPLORING ASSOCIATION RULES TO AID IN THE TRACKABILITY OF ROOT CAUSES OF ABNORMAL EVENTS AND IN THE GENERATION OF MORE PRECISE AND CONCISE EXPLANATIONS FOR ANOMALY DETECTION TECHNIQUES
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12615286
Keystroke Log Monitoring Systems
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609955
TRACKING COMPUTER DEVICES IN EXTENDED DETECTION AND RESPONSE SYSTEMS
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12603906
ALERT MONITORING OF DATA BASED ON RECOMMENDED ATTRIBUTE VALUES
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12572634
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ENCRYPTION METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+17.5%)
3y 10m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 615 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month