Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/718,548

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING SEAT PAD REINFORCING CLOTH, AND MOLDING DIE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Examiner
ROY, DEBJANI
Art Unit
1741
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Mold Technical Office Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
233 granted / 312 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
361
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 312 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1-4, 14-15 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group I, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/05/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 5-9, 11, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimada (US 20060197250) listed in IDS and JP2007001298 translation attached hereinafter JP’298 listed in IDS dated 06/11/2024 in view of Iwanuma (US 20150217354) and Ienaga (US 20240278700) further in view of JP 2017131901 translation attached hereinafter JP’901. Regarding claim 5 Shimada discloses manufacturing apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth which is to be used for a vehicular seat, the manufacturing apparatus comprising ([0054]): a molding die over which a seat-pad reinforcing cloth material is to be put in order to mold the seat-pad reinforcing cloth the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material being designed to have a shape fitting the molding die just right; (Figure 1 mold die-20, [0044], [0054]). Shimada didn’t disclose an upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding from above on an upper end portion of the molding die. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, JP’298 discloses an upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding from above on an upper end portion of the molding die , out of a seat upper ridge line portion of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (Figure 1, central mold die-1, heat pressing mold device upper portion-2a with heater 4a, [0038]), a rear portion, which has not been subjected to the pressing molding by the upper- end-portion heat-pressing molding device, out of the seat upper ridge line portion of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (Figure 1 showing ridge lines making U surface with a plane surface, rear portion-2b’ with heater-4b’); and a front-portion heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding on a front portion, which has not been subjected to the heat-pressing molding by the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device, out of the seat upper ridge line portion of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (Figure 1 showing ridge lines making U surface with a plane surface, [0036], front portion-2b with heater-4b). It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine Shimada’s teaching with that of the heat pressing molding device taught by JP’298 for the purpose of firmly fixing the laminate on the molding die. The above combination of Shimada and JP’298 didn’t disclose that to generate creases in a periphery of a rear part of a portion of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material, which has been subjected to the heat-pressing molding from above. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, Iwanuma discloses that during the hot press wrinkles/creases are generated ([0031]); therefore combining Iwanuma with JP’298 the limitation a rear-portion heat-pressing molding device configured to perform pressing molding on, together with the creases generated due to the pressing molding by the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device will be met. It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art with Shimada’s teaching and that of the heat pressing molding device taught by JP’298 combined with Iwanuma’s wrinkles formed during hot press for the purpose of ensuring some design features on the product. Further the above combination didn’t disclose that wherein the molding die is a molding die made of a resin, which is shaped by a 3D printer and . In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, Ienaga discloses that the resin body can be made of 3D printer ([0076], [0117]) It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada and that of the heat pressing molding device taught by JP’298 with the teaching of 3D printer shaped molding die taught by Ienaga for the cost effective production of the product The above combination didn’t particularly disclose that the mold is shaped by 3D printer and has a hybrid die structure formed of resins of different materials. wherein the resins of different materials include a heat-resistant resin and a non-heat-resistant resin. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, JP’901 discloses mold die is made of a heat-resistant resin i.e. a curable reactive resin and a non-heat-resistant resin ([0026], translated) . It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada and that of the heat pressing molding device taught by JP’298/Ienaga combined with JP’901 hybrid die resin properties for the purpose of different heating requirements in the molding die while being heat pressed. Further, JP’298 discloses the surface of the central mold-1 which are in contact with the heat pressed upper , front and rear molding dies that are shown in Figure 3 , which is a portion of the molding die, to which heat is to be applied by each of the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device, the rear-portion heat-pressing molding device and the front-portion heat-pressing molding device, is formed of the heat-resistant resin (Figure 3, JP’298; heat resistant resin can be used in these parts taught by JP’901), and wherein a portion of the molding die, to which no heat is to be applied by each of the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device, the rear-portion heat-pressing molding device and the front-portion heat-pressing molding device, is formed of the non-heat-resistant resin (Figure 3, discloses the surface of the central mold-1 which are not in contact with the heat pressed upper , front and rear molding dies; non heat resistant resin can be used in these parts taught by JP’901). Regarding Claim 6 JP’298 discloses apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth , wherein a heat-pressing portion of the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device has a shape following a shape of an upper end portion of the molding die ([0037], Figure 10), a heat-pressing portion of the rear-portion heat- pressing molding device has a shape following a shape of a rear portion of the molding die ([0037], Figure-10), and a heat-pressing portion of the front-portion heat-pressing molding device has a shape following a shape of a front portion of the molding die ([0037], Figure 10). Regarding Claim 7 JP’298 discloses apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth, wherein the seat upper ridge line portion of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die is present on an upper side from a middle of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (away from the centre on two edges, Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 8 JP’298 discloses apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth, further comprising: a one-side-surface heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding on one side surface of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die ( Figure 9, one side heat press molding device-15, [0061]); an another-side-surface heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding on another side surface of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (Figure 9, one side heat press molding device-15, [0061]); and a demolding mechanism configured to automatically/routinely demold the seat- pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die (Figure 9, sheet member 9 is omitted, [0078]). Regarding Claim 9 JP’298 discloses apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth, wherein the one-side-surface heat-pressing molding device and/or the another-side-surface heat-pressing molding device is a sandwiching heat-pressing molding device configured to perform heat-pressing molding by sandwiching the one side surface (Figure 9). Regarding Claim 11 JP’298 discloses that cutter is used to trim the edges of the cloth a cutting line forming device configured to form a cutting line in a part of the one side surface or the another side surface of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die, along a ridge line of the one side surface or the another side surface (Figure 9A-9D,([0061]). Regarding Claim 13 Shimada disclose that molding die, which is to be used for the manufacturing apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth,and over which a seat-pad reinforcing cloth material designed to have a shape fitting the molding die just right is to be fit,the molding die comprising (Figure 2 , mold-20, [0044], [0054]) Shimada didn’t disclose that a hollow die/porous body which is made of a resin, and which is shaped by a 3D printer. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, Ienaga discloses that the resin body/porous can be made of 3D printer ([0076], [0117]) It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada with the teaching of 3D printer shaped molding die taught by Ienaga for the cost-effective production of the product. Further, Shimada/Inaega combined disclose a suction port formed in the hollow die body (Figure 13, [0099], Shimada; hollow/porous body-1, Ienaga); and a hook for pick provided on the hollow die body (pick-23, Shimada), The above combination didn’t particularly disclose that the mold is shaped by 3D printer and has a hybrid die structure formed of resins of different materials wherein the resins of different materials include a heat-resistant resin and a non-heat-resistant resin. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, JP’901 discloses mold die is made of a heat-resistant resin i.e. a curable reactive resin and a non-heat-resistant resin ([0026], translated). It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada and that of the heat pressing molding device taught by JP’298/Ienaga combined with JP’901 hybrid die resin properties for the purpose of different heating requirements in the molding die while being heat pressed. Further, JP’298 discloses the surface of the central mold-1 which are in contact with the heat pressed upper , front and rear molding dies that are shown in Figure 3 , which is a portion of the molding die, to which heat is to be applied by each of the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device, the rear-portion heat-pressing molding device and the front-portion heat-pressing molding device, is formed of the heat-resistant resin (Figure 3, JP’298; heat resistant resin can be used in these parts taught by JP’901), and wherein a portion of the molding die, to which no heat is to be applied by each of the upper-end-portion heat-pressing molding device, the rear-portion heat-pressing molding device and the front-portion heat-pressing molding device, is formed of the non-heat-resistant resin (Figure 3, discloses the surface of the central mold-1 which are not in contact with the heat pressed upper , front and rear molding dies; non heat resistant resin can be used in these parts taught by JP’901). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimada (US 20060197250) and JP2007001298 translation attached hereinafter JP’298 listed in IDS dated 06/11/2024 in view of Iwanuma (US 20150217354) and Ienaga (US 20240278700) further in view of JP 2017131901 translation attached hereinafter JP’901 as applied in Claim 8 further in view of Harding (US 6165531) Regarding Claim 10 Shimada/JP’298 discloses manufacturing apparatus for a seat-pad reinforcing cloth with demolding meachanism, but did not include that wherein the demolding mechanism includes a mechanism configured to perform pick-and-place on the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die. In the related field of endeavor pertaining to the art, Harding discloses demolding mechanism includes a mechanism configured to perform pick-and-place (Col 8 line 62-65). It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada/JP’298 and that of the teaching demolding mechanism with pick-and-place taught by Harding for the purpose of improved demolding mechanism (col 8 line 62) Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimada (US 20060197250) and JP2007001298 translation attached hereinafter JP’298 listed in IDS dated 06/11/2024 in view of Iwanuma (US 20150217354) and Ienaga (US 20240278700) further in view of JP 2017131901 translation attached hereinafter JP’901 as applied in Claim 11 further in view of CN 101733556 translation attached hereinafter CN’556 . Regarding Claim 12 JP’298 discloses that cutter is used to trim the edges of the cloth a cutting line forming device configured to form a cutting line in a part of the one side surface or the another side surface of the seat-pad reinforcing cloth material put over the molding die, along a ridge line of the one side surface or the another side surface (Figure 9A-9D,([0061]) but didn’t disclose that cutting line forming device is a Co2 laser marker. It would have been obvious for one ordinary skilled in the art to combine the teaching of Shimada/JP’298 and that of the teaching of CN’556 laser maker for the purpose of more focused with high precision and high quality cutting effect. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEBJANI ROY whose telephone number is (571)272-8019. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison HIndenlang can be reached at 571-700-7001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEBJANI ROY/Examiner, Art Unit 1741 /ALISON L HINDENLANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599237
CHAIR WITH FLEXIBLE INTERNAL SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594700
COATINGS FROM POLYISOCYANURATE COATINGS (RIM) AND THEIR USE IN INJECTION MOLDING PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589560
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A GRID MADE OF A COMPOSITE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588806
TIP HOUSING FOR AN ENDOSCOPE WITH A COATED WALL SURFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583152
INJECTION MOLDING APPARATUS AND INJECTION MOLDING PROCESS FOR PRODUCING MULTICOMPONENT PLASTICS MOLDINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month