Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/718,739

COMPARTMENT FOR A DEVICE LIABLE TO GIVE OFF HEAT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Priority
Dec 16, 2021 — FR 2113739 +1 more
Examiner
OHARA, BRIAN R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
457 granted / 575 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
595
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.6%
+21.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 2-10 depend on claim 1 and thus are also subjected to the 112 rejection. The claim can we re-written to remove the phase “such as” and have the reinforcing elements comprising glass fibers or carbon fiber, or removing “such as glass fiber or carbon fibers” either option is valid. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Kim (KR 20200033784 A see attached translation) is the closest prior art of record. However, Raiser (US 2018/0062226); Wuensche (US 2018/0013105) and Milton (US 2017/0324128) are also relevant prior arts of record however are missing key claimed elements and are just being shown as relevant prior arts of record. Kim discloses compartment for a device liable to give off heat during operation, wherein the device is an electrical energy storage device for a vehicle (page 3 abstract), the compartment comprising: at least one seat arranged to receive the electrical device (figure 42 #1110 or figure 47 #2200, is the module seating portion, can be seen within other figures and throughout Kim); at least one beam forming a side wall of the seat (figures 5, 34, 42 and throughout the beams are #110, #340 or #1200 or the equivalent, discussed throughout); a cover arranged to be assembled with the beam to close the seat (figure 47 #2100 or 2400, the cover or bottom for several embodiments can also be seen throughout), the beam in the compartment comprising a core made of a composite material containing a plastics material and reinforcing elements, such as glass fibers or carbon fibers (figures 5, 34, 42 and throughout the beams are #110, #340 or #1200 or the equivalent, fiber-reinforced plastic is a material discussed throughout and could be used as the beam), wherein either the beam or the cover comprise at least one metal element (metals, such as aluminum are discussed throughout as known elements used throughout several embodiments). Kim is silent to at least one metal claw arranged to come into contact with the metal element and to penetrate the material bearing the metal element. Therefore, Kim is silent to the interaction with the metal claw and other components. Such as wherein the metal element is electrically continuous with the metal claw so as to participate in an electromagnetic protection of the compartment. Within the beams there are fixing holes i.e. #110 and screw are used such as fastening elements (page 24). However, there is no indication that the screws have the required metal claw as instant claimed. This is best seen within instant figure 5 #40. Additionally, the examiner has attached an NPL showing different screw heads that maybe construed to have a metal claw. However, there is no motivation to use any of the very few screws that could possibly meet this limitation. Even then if one was used the material of the screw and the metal would come into play as the claim requires the metal claw to penetrate the material bearing the metal element. Lastly, then the level of tightening the screw would also come into play as the screw would have to be extremely screwed to reach the instant claimed penetration. Therefore, the instant claimed invention has been deemed novel and non-obvious once the 112 rejection has been overcome. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN R OHARA whose telephone number is (571)272-0728. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM-3:30 PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN R OHARA/Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749681
Lithium Battery Cathode Active Material Having Oriented Structure, and Preparation Method Therefor
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749682
BINARY SUBSTITUTED VANADIUM PHOSPHATE ELECTRODE MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738608
SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738496
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE AND SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738588
BATTERY MODULE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month