Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/718,741

Method for Producing Spectacles Lenses, and a Positioning Receptacle for/having a Spectacles Lens Semifinished Product

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Priority
Dec 13, 2021 — DE 10 2021 006 153.5 +1 more
Examiner
VARGOT, MATHIEU D
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Satisloh AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
729 granted / 1179 resolved
-3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
76.2%
+36.2% vs TC avg
§102
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1179 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1.Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 3, “namely a front side…rear side (14) remote therefrom” constitutes a preferred limitation that should be set forth in a separate dependent claim. The language “namely” should be changed to --comprising—at line 3 to correct this. Claim 2, line 3, “particularly by machining” also constitutes a preferred limitation that should be set forth in a separate dependent claim. See also claim 13, line 3 and claim 15, line 4 for preferred limitations set forth in ”particularly…” and “in particular…” clauses. See also claim 16, last two lines and claim 18, line 4. 2.Claims 1-19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The claims would be allowable over the art of record in that such art does not disclose the instant method wherein the semi-finished product and positioning retainer are transported together for further processing as set forth in instant claim 1 or the positioning retainer with positioning sections that are irregularly arranged around a central axis of the retainer and extend obliquely to the central axis and/or are radially displaceable as set forth in instant claim 8 or the combination of the positioning retainer of instant claim 8 and a spectacle lens semi-finished product as recited in instant claim 15. 3.The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lobdell discloses forming notches on a molded lens using a gasket equipped with projections to form the notches. 4.Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATHIEU D VARGOT whose telephone number is (571)272-1211. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri from 9 to 6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina A Johnson, can be reached at telephone number 571 272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /MATHIEU D VARGOT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629911
METHOD FOR DRY-FORMING A CELLULOSE BOTTLE, CELLULOSE BOTTLE FORMING UNIT AND CELLULOSE BOTTLE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629906
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MANUFACTURE A CONTACT LENS WITH AN EMBEDDED ELEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623417
FIXATION FIXTURE, PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING LIQUID CRYSTAL LENS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623418
Functional Layer Application System
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12605045
AN ENDOSCOPE AND A METHOD FOR MOULDING TRANSPARENT WINDOWS OF AN ENDOSCOPE
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1179 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month