Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/719,335

PENDULUM ROCKER DAMPER WITH AN AXIS OF ROTATION FOR A DRIVE TRAIN

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2022 — DE 10 2022 100 596.8 +1 more
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1468 granted / 1814 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1845
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1814 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Drawings The drawings are objected to because: Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See Fig. 1 in US 12,000,453. The scale is too small and lines are too light in Fig. 1 to clearly show the features of the instant invention. The drawings fail to show: A rocker damper comprising both a first energy storage element 9 and second energy storage element 15 like that recited in claims 1 & 10 Stiffer material recited in claims 2 & 12. Fig. 9 includes solid black shading. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. At each of lines 3-4 & 8 in claim 8 the limitation “a torque” is recited. It is unclear if each torque is unique or referring back to a previously recited torque. At line 5 in claim 8, the limitation, “a consumer” is recited. It is unclear if this consumer is the same as or different from the previously recited consumer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 6-11, 13 & 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gatewood, US 4,465,172. Claims 1 & 10: Gatewood discloses a pendulum rocker damper (35) for a drive train comprising: an axis of rotation (see Figs. 6 &7); a first outer connection (26a); a primary side (39) connected to the first outer connection in a torque transmitting manner: a second side connection (13); a secondary side (a2a) connected to the second outer connection in a torque transmitting manner; a rocker element (14a); a rocker-side roller track (19a); an outer roller track (42) complementary to the rocker side roller track; a roller (33a) arranged to roll on the rocker-side roller track and the outer roller track; a first energy storage element (53, 54) arranged to pretension the roller against the rocker-side roller track and the outer roller track (see Fig. 6); a second energy storage element (19a) arranged in the roller, or in the rocker-side roller track or the outer roller track, and arranged to pretension (see preload” at col. 4, line 2) the roller against one of the rocker-side roller track or the outer roller track in a direction perpendicular to the one of the rocker-side roller track or the outer roller track when the first energy storage element is in a resting position (se Fig. 6). Claim 6. Fig. 6 shows at least one of the second energy storage elements (19a) is arranged to exert the second pretensioning force in a locally limited manner on an associated roller (33a). Claims 8 & 9. At col. 1, lines 6-15, Gatewood disclose the damper (35) is used in a motor vehicle drivetrain between an engine and a drive wheel. Claim 11. Fig. 6 shows the rocker-side roller track (19a) pretensions the roller (33a). Claim 13. Fig. 6 shows each of the primary side and the secondary side comprises respective ones of the rocker-side roller track, the outer roller track, the roller and the second energy storage element. Claims 7 & 16. Fig. 8 shows the rocker element (14a) comprises an additional mass (18a) that adjusts a rotating inertia of the rocker element. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 12 & 14-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fawick and Sacher each appear to show a damper with an energy storage element arranged in a roller. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636908
DRIVE AXLE ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631220
TORQUE LIMITER AND POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624732
CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT SPIDER AND CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT THEREWITH
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620860
DRIVE UNIT FOR A VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612938
INTERMEDIATE SHAFT
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1814 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month