Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/719,539

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF FRICTION TORQUE LIMITER

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 27, 2021 — JP 2021-212962 +1 more
Examiner
SKROUPA, JOSHUA A
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Origin Company Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1041 granted / 1296 resolved
+28.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1331
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1296 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings Replacement drawings were received on September 14, 2026. These drawings are approved. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. The term "thin", in line 6 of each of claims 13 and 14, is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "thin" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. What one person may interpret as thin, another may not. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (Takayama; the citations of which are taken from the attached translation). Regarding claim 13, Takayama discloses a manufacturing method of a torque limiter (see especially Figures 7A, 7B, and 8) that includes an inner ring (2) having a circular cross section (see Figure 7B), a spring member (1) that is annular (see Figure 8), and an outer ring (3), which have a common center axis (see Figures 7A and 7B), in which the spring member surrounds an outer peripheral surface of the inner ring, and the spring member and the outer ring are assembled so as to be relatively non-rotational by retaining means (see annotated Figure 1 below and paragraph [0021]), the spring member includes a base portion (1a) that is an annular thin plate (see Figure 8 and paragraph [0016]), and a plurality of elastic pieces (1b) that extend toward an inner side in a radial direction, inclined in an axial direction, and that also are disposed at intervals in a peripheral direction (see Figure 8), with tip end portions of the elastic pieces having abutting inner surfaces (1B) that abut the outer peripheral surface of the inner ring (see Figure 8 and paragraphs [0016]-[0018]), and when rotational torque of a predetermined value or greater is applied between the inner ring and the outer ring, the inner ring and the outer ring rotate relative to each other against frictional force between the outer peripheral surface of the inner ring and the abutting inner surfaces of the spring member (see paragraphs [0002] and [0016]-[0019]), wherein the retaining means is made up of a retaining protrusion (a1, a2, a3) that protrudes toward an outer side in the radial direction from an outer peripheral surface of the base portion of the spring member and a retained protrusion (see annotated Figure 1 below) that protrudes toward the inner side in the radial direction from an inner peripheral surface of the outer ring, and base ends of the elastic pieces are connected to an inner peripheral surface of the base portion (see Figures 7A and 7B), the manufacturing method comprising: a press-fitting step of press-fitting the spring member to the inner ring by pressing the base portion of the spring member overall by an annular pressing tool in the axial direction with respect to the inner ring (either of the inner ring and outer ring may function as an annular pressing tool for the spring member; further the human hand can form an annular pressing tool for pressing the spring member; see also paragraph [0014] where member 4 functions as an annular pressing tool); and an assembling step of, following the press-fitting step, assembling the inner ring to which the spring member is press-fit, with the outer ring (see paragraph [0015]). PNG media_image1.png 272 491 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1. Annotated Figure 7B of Takayama Regarding claim 14, Takayama discloses a manufacturing method of a torque limiter (see especially Figures 7A, 7B, and 8) that includes an inner ring (2) having a circular cross section (see Figure 7B), a spring member (1) that is annular (see Figure 8), and an outer ring (3), which have a common center axis (see Figures 7A and 7B), in which the spring member surrounds an outer peripheral surface of the inner ring, and the spring member and the outer ring are assembled so as to be relatively non-rotational by retaining means (see annotated Figure 1 below and paragraph [0021]), the spring member includes a base portion (1a) that is an annular thin plate (see Figure 8 and paragraph [0016]), and a plurality of elastic pieces (1b) that extend toward an inner side in a radial direction, inclined in an axial direction, and that also are disposed at intervals in a peripheral direction (see Figure 8), with tip end portions of the elastic pieces having abutting inner surfaces (1B) that abut the outer peripheral surface of the inner ring (see Figure 8 and paragraphs [0016]-[0018]), and when rotational torque of a predetermined value or greater is applied between the inner ring and the outer ring, the inner ring and the outer ring rotate relative to each other against frictional force between the outer peripheral surface of the inner ring and the abutting inner surfaces of the spring member (see paragraphs [0002] and [0016]-[0019]), wherein the retaining means is made up of a retaining protrusion (a1, a2, a3) that protrudes toward an outer side in the radial direction from an outer peripheral surface of the base portion of the spring member and a retained protrusion (see annotated Figure 1 below) that protrudes toward the inner side in the radial direction from an inner peripheral surface of the outer ring, and base ends of the elastic pieces are connected to an inner peripheral surface of the base portion (see Figures 7A and 7B), the manufacturing method comprising: a press-fitting step of press-fitting the spring member to the inner ring by pressing the base portion of the spring member in the axial direction with respect to the inner ring (see paragraphs [0014]-[0019]) in a state in which guides are disposed on both sides in the peripheral direction of the retaining protrusion (see annotated Figure1 above); and an assembling step of, following the press-fitting step, assembling the inner ring to which the spring member is press-fit, with the outer ring (see paragraph [0015]). Regarding claim 15, Takayama discloses, in the press-fitting step, a plurality of the spring members (1) are sequentially press-fit to the inner ring, and an amount of press-fitting of each of the plurality of spring members as to the inner ring (2) is gradually reduced (an inherent feature in that once one spring member is assembled, the distance which a second spring member can be fit, is reduced). Regarding claim 16, Takayama discloses a support wall (a’1, a’2, a’3) that is cylindrical is provided on an outer peripheral edge of the base portion (1a), erected in the axial direction and thereafter extending outward in the radial direction (see Figure 8). Regarding claim 17, Takayama discloses the spring member (1) is formed by pressing a plate made of metal (see Figure 8 and paragraph [0016]). Regarding claim 18, Takayama discloses, in the press-fitting step, a plurality of the spring members (1) are sequentially press-fit to the inner ring, and an amount of press-fitting of each of the plurality of spring members as to the inner ring (2) is gradually reduced (an inherent feature in that once one spring member is assembled, the distance which a second spring member can be fit, is reduced). Regarding claim 19, Takayama discloses a support wall (a’1, a’2, a’3) that is cylindrical is provided on an outer peripheral edge of the base portion (1a), erected in the axial direction and thereafter extending outward in the radial direction (see Figure 8). Regarding claim 20, Takayama discloses the spring member (1) is formed by pressing a plate made of metal (see Figure 8 and paragraph [0016]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed September 14, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On the outset, the Examiner notes the Takayama reference corresponds to the prior art embodiment in the previously applied JP 2019-199912 (Kobayashi) reference. To that end, the arguments provided by Applicant in the remarks filed September 14, 2026 would also apply to the Takayama reference. On pages 11-12, Applicant asserts the prior art fails to disclose an annular pressing tool. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. As set forth above regarding claim 13, and as set forth in the previous rejection of claim 3, either of the inner ring and outer ring may function as an annular pressing tool for the spring member. Further the human hand can form an annular pressing tool for pressing the spring member. See also paragraph [0014] of Takayama, where member 4 functions as an annular pressing tool. On page 12, Applicant asserts the prior art fails to disclose guides being disposed on both sides of the peripheral direction of the retaining protrusion. The Examiner respectfully disagrees and directs Applicant’s attention to annotated Figure 1 above which shows the torque limiter of Takayama possesses guides on both sides of the peripheral direction of the retaining protrusion. Conclusion The prior art set forth in the attached Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) made of record and not relied upon (US 5,480,016 to Kurz) is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure in the field of annular press-fitting tools. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Josh Skroupa whose telephone number is (571)270-3220. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM – 3:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached on (571)270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Josh Skroupa/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678 September 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 14, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768172
ADJUSTABLE GRAB RAILING
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759699
PASS-THROUGH COUPLING SHAFT
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760551
CONNECTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753785
ASSEMBLY FOR NON-DETACHABLE CONNECTION OF PLASTIC PARTS FOR A CAR
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753802
Transfer Case Yoke
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1296 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month