Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/719,568

VOID FILL PACKAGING PRODUCT AND METHODS FOR MAKING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Examiner
CHEUNG, CHUN HOI
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Temperpack Technologies INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
641 granted / 1035 resolved
-8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1076
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of Group I (claims 1–12) in the reply filed on 10/27/2025 is acknowledged. The traverse argues that searching Groups I and II would not impose an undue search burden. This argument is not persuasive because claims 13–19 recite specific process step that “the crumpling of the at least two layers in the second direction comprises using one or more first sets of rollers/second set of rollers to force portions of the at least two layers in the second direction to overlap and interlock while wrapped around the mold,” as set forth in claims 17–19. These specific process steps are not required by the product claims in Group I. In Group I, the crumpling of the layers in the second and third directions could be performed manually (e.g., sliding two hands toward each other) or by using a mold with a stationary flange and a presser to compress the layers toward the flange. Because of these additional process limitations, a separate search in a different classification—USPC B31D—is required, which would create an undue search burden for the examiner to conduct both the product (Group I) and process (Group II) searches. Applicant has further added new claims 20–25, which include the same limitations as claims 13–19 but are now dependent from claim 1. For the same reasons discussed above, the added process limitations would necessitate searching a different class/subclass and would result in an undue search burden on the examiner. Therefore, applicant’s arguments regarding the restriction requirement are not found persuasive. Claims 20-25 are hereby withdrawn from consideration. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/03/2025 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Higa (5,525,176). PNG media_image1.png 439 568 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 1, Higa discloses a product (material product 12) comprising a single continuous paper sheet (a flat sheet paper material 12) spiraled surrounding a hollow center (the flat sheet is wrapped around cylinder 60) and forming at least two layers (overlapping edge 70) that overlap in a first direction, wherein portions of the at least two layers overlap and are mechanically joined in a second direction that is approximately perpendicular to the first direction (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive.) As to claim 2, Higa further discloses the portions of the at least two layers are mechanically joined without adhesive or stitching (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive). As to claim 3, Higa further discloses the at least two layers are crumpled in the second direction (Figure 7). As to claim 4, Higa further discloses wherein the at least two layers overlap and are mechanically joined in a third direction opposite of the second direction (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive.) As to claim 5, Higa further discloses the at least two layers are crumpled in the third direction (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive). As to claim 6, Higa further discloses a circular cross-section (the mold 60 is in the shaped of cylinder, which shows a circular cross-section of the crumpled paper, Figure 7). As to claim 7, Higa discloses a product (material product 12) comprising a single continuous paper sheet (a flat sheet paper material 12) spiraled surrounding a hollow center (the flat sheet is wrapped around cylinder 60) and forming at least two layers (overlapping edge 70) that overlap in a first direction, wherein portions of the at least two layers overlap and are mechanically joined in a second direction (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive). As to claim 8, Higa further discloses the portions of the at least two layers are mechanically joined without adhesive or stitching (as shown in Figures 6- 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive) and the single spiraled continuous sheet comprises paper (crimpled paper article, abstract). As to claim 9, Higa further discloses the at least two layers are crumpled in the second direction (Figure 7). As to claim 10, Higa further discloses wherein the at least two layers overlap and are mechanically joined in a third direction opposite of the second direction (as shown in Figure 7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive.) As to claim 11, Higa further discloses the at least two layers are crumpled in the third direction (as shown in Figures 6-7, the tubular wrapped sheet is crumpled in the longitudinal second and third directions, such that the crumpling process at both ends causes the overlapping portion 70 to deform and mechanically interlock without the use of any glue or adhesive). As to claim 12, Higa further discloses a circular cross-section (the mold 60 is in the shaped of cylinder, which shows a circular cross-section of the crumpled paper, Figure 7). Conclusion Examiner has cited particular paragraphs and/or columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested of the applicant, in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or prior art(s) disclosed by the Examiner (in the attached PTO-892 form). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHUN HOI CHEUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-5702. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E Aviles can be reached at (571)270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHUN HOI CHEUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600526
BAG ROLL CASSETTE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593648
SEMICONDUCTOR WORKPIECE TRANSPORT POD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12565372
Packaging for a Plurality of Unit Medical Vessels and Processing System Implementing Such Packaging
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552569
DRILL BIT PACKAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544280
REUSABLE CUTTING ARTICLES AND WOUND TAPE ARTICLES AND KITS CONTAINING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month