Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/719,779

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING A BUNDLE OF FILAMENTS AND/OR A YARN

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2021 — provisional 63/361,389 +1 more
Examiner
KHAN, AMINA S
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
ALADDIN MANUFACTURING Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
486 granted / 1022 resolved
-17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1087
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1022 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-8,11,16-18 and 103-110 are pending. Claims 9-10,12-15 and 19-102 have been cancelled. Claims 1,5,6,8,11,16 and 17 have been amended. Claims 103-110 are new. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 104-110 in the reply filed on December 30, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-8,11,16-18,and 103 to 110 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 104-110 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Needham (WO 00/34555) in view of Weiss (US 6,085,395). Needham teaches producing colored filaments from polyamides, polyesters, polyolefins and combinations thereof by coextrusion in a concentric structure (page 7, lines 5-16) and using filament bundles to produce textile materials (page 8, lines 3-10). Needham teaches producing shade differences such a color difference to produce a desired color pattern or characteristic (page 8, lines 18-20). Needham teaches the diameter and thickness of the filaments can be chosen based on a desired level of functionality of the application of the filament (page 7, lines 17-22). Needham teaches randomized color addition and the ability to produce many color interactions (page 7, lines 1-3) Needham does not teach yarns. Weiss teaches producing muticolored yarns by combining differently colored filaments (column 2, lines 5-8) wherein the filament bundles differ in polymer type, color or dyeability (column 2, lines 34-37). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the filaments of Needham by making them into yarns as Weiss teaches yarns for textile applications are conventionally made of filament bundles that differ in color, dyeability or polymer composition and Needham invites the inclusion of the filament and filament bundles in textile applications. Regarding the selection of the colors for the first second and third filaments and the average denier between locations, Needham clearly teaches randomly adding coloration across the length of the filaments and using different polymers with different colors in concentric rings across the radial cross-section of the filament. Needham teaches the coloration pattern across the cross-section and length can be determined based on the desired color pattern and is therefor a design choice. Needham further teaches the diameter and thickness of the yarn can be determined based on the desired level of functionality for the filament application and teaches straight fibers of specific diameters indicating a single diameter for the length of the filament can be chosen which is substantially constant with less than 5% variation between different locations on the filament. Combining different types of uniquely colored individual filaments into the fiber bundles and yarns is obvious to arrive at the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMINA S KHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5573. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMINA S KHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680226
ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIVIRAL FABRIC
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12617964
DIGITAL PRINTED FABRIC, MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR DIGITAL PRINTED FABRIC, AND DIGITAL PRINTING INK
3y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12606952
METHOD FOR PRODUCING MODIFIED CELLULOSE FIBER, AND MODIFIED CELLULOSE FIBER
5y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606876
PREPARATION METHOD OF PLANT BIOMASS-BASED ACTIVE TANNING AGENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12600924
NON-CATIONIC SOFTENERS AND METHODS OF USE
4y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+43.8%)
3y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1022 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month