Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/720,012

SIDELINK FEEDBACK MESSAGING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022078164
Examiner
DANIEL JR, WILLIE J
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
440 granted / 723 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.1%
+29.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 723 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to application filed on 14 June 2024 (including amendment filed simultaneously). Claims 1-34 are now pending in the present application. This office action is made Non-Final. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 14 June 2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being by Khoshnevisan et al. (hereinafter Khoshnevisan) (US 2021/0410155 A1). Regarding claims 12, 1, 18, and 29, Khoshnevisan discloses a UE (e.g., 106) for wireless communication { (see Figs. 1-2 & 17) }, comprising: a memory (e.g., 1705) { (see Fig. 17) }; and one or more processors (e.g., 1704), coupled to the memory (e.g., 1705), configured to { (see Fig. 17) }: receive a first one or more physical sidelink shared channel communications associated with a first set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities, of a plurality of physical sidelink shared channel priorities, and associated with a first feedback message codebook, wherein the first feedback message codebook is specific to the first set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities and is associated with a first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13), where the system provides communication via sidelink and has channel priority }; receive a second one or more physical sidelink shared channel communications associated with a second set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities, of the plurality of physical sidelink shared channel priorities, and associated with a second feedback message codebook, wherein the second feedback message codebook is specific to the second set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities and is associated with a second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; Figs. 6-13) }, wherein the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource and the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource are at least partially overlapping in time { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; Figs. 6-13) }; and transmit a feedback message in one of the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource or the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource, wherein the feedback message conveys feedback for at least one of the first set of physical sidelink shared channel communications or the second set of physical sidelink shared channel communications based at least in part on respective sets of physical sidelink shared channel priorities { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13), where the system provides communication via sidelink and has channel priority }. Regarding claims 2, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource configuration is common to the plurality of physical sidelink shared channel priorities { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 3, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 2, wherein the physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource configuration includes a set of resource blocks (RBs), wherein the set of RBs is split into a plurality of physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource block groups (RBGs) based at least in part on a set of sub-channels and on the respective sets of physical sidelink shared channel priorities, and wherein each RBG, of the plurality of RBGs, includes a plurality of RBs, of the set of RBs, and is associated with a sub-channel and with a set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 4, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 3, wherein a mapping between the sub-channel and an RBG comprises a frequency first, priority second order { (see pg. 6, [0065]; pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 5, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 3, wherein a mapping between the sub-channel and an RBG comprises a priority first, frequency second order { (see pg. 6, [0065]; pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 6, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 2, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: determine a size of a physical sidelink feedback channel resource pool for the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource and the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource based at least in part on at least one of: a quantity of resource blocks (RBs) in a physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource block group (RBG), a quantity of RBs for a physical sidelink feedback channel resource, a quantity of cyclic shift pairs, or a quantity of physical sidelink feedback channel resources available for multiplexing feedback information in a physical sidelink feedback channel transmission { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 7, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 2, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: select, using a hash function and based at least in part on a UE identifier and on a groupcast identifier associated with a physical sidelink feedback channel resource pool, the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource and the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 8, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 2, wherein a coding rate is based at least in part on at least one of a physical sidelink feedback channel format or a physical sidelink shared channel priority { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 9, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource configuration comprises first physical sidelink feedback channel resources configured for the first set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities and second physical sidelink feedback channel resources configured for the second set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 10, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 9, wherein the first physical sidelink feedback channel resources and second physical sidelink feedback channel resources are subject to at least one of frequency division multiplexing or time division multiplexing { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 11, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 9, wherein the first physical sidelink feedback channel resources and the second physical sidelink feedback channel resources are configured in at least one of: different physical resource blocks, or different slots { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 13, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 12, wherein the first set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities are a set of high priorities and the second set of physical sidelink shared channel priorities are a set of low priorities relative to the set of high priorities, and wherein feedback for the first set of physical sidelink shared channel communications is included in the feedback message, and feedback for the second set of physical sidelink shared channel communications is dropped from the feedback message based at least in part on the respective sets of physical sidelink shared channel priorities { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 14, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 12, wherein first feedback for the first set of physical sidelink shared channel communications and second feedback for the second set of physical sidelink shared channel communications are multiplexed into the feedback message { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 15, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein the first feedback and the second feedback are separately encoded and separately mapped to resource elements of the one of the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource or the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 16, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein the first feedback and the second feedback are concatenated, jointly encoded, and jointly mapped to resource elements of the one of the first physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource or the second physical sidelink feedback channel feedback resource { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Regarding claims 17, Khoshnevisan discloses the UE of claim 12, wherein whether the feedback message conveys feedback for the first set of physical sidelink shared channel communications or the second set of physical sidelink shared channel communications is based at least in part on at least one of a radio resource control configuration or a static pre-configuration { (see pg. 8, [0080, 0083]; pg. 5, [0053]; Figs. 1-2 & 6-13) }. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIE J DANIEL JR whose telephone number is (571)272-7907. The examiner can normally be reached on 9 - 6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached on 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIE J DANIEL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 WJD,Jr 12 June 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677270
HANDLING BS-TO-BS INTERFERENCE IN RADIO ACCESS NETWORKS
5y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672005
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM AND A METHOD OF MANAGING NETWORK LOAD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666492
DRX OPERATION METHOD AND DEVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659096
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING 5G NEW RADIO UPLINK POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNALS
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659084
TRANSIMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 10m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 723 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month