Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/720,060

GRASPING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2021 — JP 2021-203536 +1 more
Examiner
RIEGELMAN, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bridgestone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
756 granted / 968 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
997
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 968 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 3, the following should be deleted: “a soft actuator” and in its place the following should be inserted: “soft actuators”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 4 objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 4, the following should be deleted: “an tip” and in its place the following should be inserted: “a tip”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, what is the relationship between the “a plurality of fluid pressure actuators” (introduced in claim 1, line 1), the “the fluid pressure actuator” (introduced in claim 1, line 4), and the “other fluid pressure actuator” (introduced in claim 1, line 5)? Do the plurarity of fluid pressure actuators consist of 1) a fluid pressure actuator and 2) and other fluid pressure actuator? The wording here and manner in which each component is introduced needs to be more clear. What is the relationship between the “a bottom view of the grasping device” introduced in claim 3, line 2 and claim 4, line 2, and the “a bottom view of the grasping device” introduced in claim 1, line 4? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Shin, JP 2008194788. PNG media_image1.png 364 330 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Shin discloses a grasping device (1) using a plurality of fluid pressure actuators (2,3) that are curved during contraction (see [0054], fig 8) , wherein the fluid pressure actuators (2,3) are a soft actuator (11, see [0048]), in a bottom view (shown from above in fig 9b) of the grasping device (1), a tip portion (adjacent 8) of the fluid pressure actuator (3) overlaps with a tip portion (as described above) of a other fluid pressure actuator (2) when each of the fluid pressure actuators contracts (see fig 9b). Regarding claim 2, Shin discloses the grasping device (1) according to claim 1, the fluid pressure actuators (2,3) comprise: a tube (11) that is cylindrical (cylindrical tube) and expands and contracts under fluid pressure (see [0037]); and a sleeve (12) having a stretchable structures (mesh-like braded member – see fig 2-4) in which fiber cords oriented in a predetermined direction are woven and that covers an outer peripheral surface (see fig 6, [0038]) of the tube (11). Regarding claim 3, Shin discloses the grasping device according to claim 1, wherein each of the fluid pressure actuators (2,3) is provided such that, in a bottom view of the grasping device (as described above), a straight line along an axial direction (vertically along axis of 3 in fig 9a) of the fluid pressure actuator (3) avoids intersection with a straight line along an axial direction (vertically along axis of 2) of the other fluid pressure actuator (2). Regarding claims 5, 7-8, Shin discloses the grasping device according to claims 1-3,wherein the number of the fluid pressure actuators (2,3) is two or more and four or less (3 in fig 9a-b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin in view of Li et al., US PGPub 2019/0001508. Regarding claim 4, Shin discloses the grasping device according to claim 1 but does not specify the circumferential orientation of the fluid actuators. PNG media_image2.png 432 404 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 292 246 media_image3.png Greyscale Li teaches a similar fluid actuator based gripper (1), wherein an proximal end portion (end adjacent 13, 23, 33 and 43) of each of the fluid pressure actuators (10, 20, 30, 40) is provided a circumference in a bottom view of the grasping device (see fig 3), and an tip portion (end of 13, 23, 33, and 43) each of the fluid pressure actuators (10,20,30,40) is directed to a position offset (see fig 1d) from a center of an arc forming the circumference when the fluid pressure actuator (10,20,30, 40) contracts. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to orient the fluid pressure actuators in the specified manner in order to improve the stability for gripping irregularly shaped objects. Regarding claim 9, Shin discloses the grasping device according to claim 4,wherein the number of the fluid pressure actuators (2,3) is two or more and four or less (3 in fig 9a-b). Claim(s) 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin in view of Ono, JP2021-88999. Regarding claim 6, Shin discloses the grasping device according to claim 2 but does not specify the restricting member. PNG media_image4.png 502 756 media_image4.png Greyscale Ono teaches a similar fluid pressure actuator (see fig 1), wherein the fluid pressure actuator (10) comprises a restricting member (150) provided inside in the sleeve (120) from one end to another end in the axial direction of the tube (see fig 1,4). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the restricting member described by Ono to the system disclosed by Shin in order to resist contraction in the axial direction and strengthen and stabilize the gripping member during motion. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7956. The examiner can normally be reached 8-6 EST Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Hodge can be reached at (571) 272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL A. RIEGELMAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3654 /MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698185
RESETTING A SAFETY ACTUATOR IN AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698184
ELEVATOR POSITIONING SYSTEM WITH FREQUENCY SPECTRUM FOOTPRINTING
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692123
METHOD AND AN APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AN ELEVATOR CALL
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692901
METHOD FOR LUBRICATING A BEARING, LUBRICANT SUPPLY SYSTEM AND WIND TURBINE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686595
ELEVATOR DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 968 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month