Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/720,252

OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE WITH MULTIPLE OPTICAL PATHS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Dec 16, 2021 — provisional 63/290,114 +1 more
Examiner
GROSS, ALEXANDER P
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
333 granted / 563 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
584
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.3%
+20.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 7-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Borisov et al. (US Pub. 20230221570, Borisov). As per claim 1, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) a waveguide comprising: an incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) configured to: receive display light representative of an image for display (paragraph 170); and direct a first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within the waveguide along a first optical path (along the direction of vector K1 see paragraphs 119, 126 and 203-206) and a second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within the waveguide along a second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 208-210), wherein the first optical path and the second optical path have substantially non-overlapping propagation angles; and an outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) configured to combine the first portion of the display light and the second portion of the display light to display the final representation of the image (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) wherein the final representation has a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) (paragraphs 171-173). As per claim 2, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) corresponds to a first spatial portion of the image (upper middle of the vertical field of view see figure 7), and wherein the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) corresponds to a second spatial portion of the image (lower middle of the vertical field of view see figure 7) (paragraph 191). As per claim 3, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the first spatial portion of the image and the second spatial portion of the image partially overlap (paragraph 182). As per claim 4, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-6 and 8) a waveguide comprising: an incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) configured to: receive display light representative of an image for display (paragraph 170); and direct a first portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) to propagate within the waveguide along a first optical path (along the direction of vector K6 see paragraphs 117-118, 126 and 131-136) and a second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) to propagate within the waveguide along a second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 137-139), wherein the first optical path and the second optical path have substantially non-overlapping propagation angles; and an outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) configured to combine the first portion of the display light and the second portion of the display light to display a final representation of the image (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) (paragraph 171), wherein the final representation has a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) (paragraph 171) wherein the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) comprises a first set of wavelengths (blue and green), and wherein the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) comprises a second set of wavelengths (green and red) that is distinct from the first set (see figure 4 and paragraph 131-138). As per claim 5, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the waveguide comprises: a first exit pupil expander (first multiplying diffractive element Y) disposed in the first optical path and configured to redirect the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) toward the outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) (paragraphs 203-206); and a second exit pupil expander (second multiplying diffractive element Y) disposed in the second optical path and configured to redirect the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) toward the outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) (paragraphs 207-210). As per claim 7, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) is further configured to: receive the display light from an optical engine (projector 2); divide the display light into at least the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) and the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top); redirect the first portion of the display light to propagate within the waveguide along the first optical path (along the direction of vector K1 see paragraphs 119, 126 and 203-206); and redirect the second portion of the display light to propagate within the waveguide along the second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 208-210). As per claim 8, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) is further configured to divide the display light into a third portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and 2 of diffractive elements comprising the upper and lower quarters of the vertical FOV), and to direct the third portion of the display light to propagate along a third optical path (along the direction of vector K6 see paragraphs 117-118, 126, and 195-202) that is distinct from the first optical path and the second optical path. As per claim 9, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the final representation is a combination of the first representation of the image (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top), the second representation of the image (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top), and a third representation of the image conveyed by the third portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and 2 of diffractive elements comprising the upper and lower quarters of the vertical FOV) (see figure 7 and paragraphs 171-174) . As per claim 10, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) a method comprising: receiving display light representative of an image for display (at in-coupling diffractive element X see paragraph 170); directing a first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within a waveguide along a first optical path (along the direction of vector K1 see paragraphs 119, 126 and 203-206) and a second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within the waveguide along a second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 208-210), wherein the first optical path and the second optical path have substantially non-overlapping propagation angles; and combining the first portion of the display light and the second portion of the display light to display a final representation of the image (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) having a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) (paragraphs 171-173).. As per claim 11, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) convays a first spatial portion of the image (upper middle of the vertical field of view see figure 7), and wherein the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) conveys a second spatial portion of the image (lower middle of the vertical field of view see figure 7) (paragraph 191). As per claim 12, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) that the first spatial portion of the image and the second spatial portion of the image partially overlap (paragraph 182). As per claim 13, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-6 and 8) a method comprising: receiving display light representative of an image for display (at in-coupling diffractive element X see paragraph 170); directing a first portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) to propagate within the waveguide along a first optical path (along the direction of vector K6 see paragraphs 117-118, 126 and 131-136) and a second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) to propagate within the waveguide along a second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 137-139), wherein the first optical path and the second optical path have substantially non-overlapping propagation angles; and combining the first portion of the display light and the second portion of the display light to display a final representation of the image (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) (paragraph 171) having a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) (paragraph 171) wherein the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and set 2 of diffractive elements and comprises the full blue FOV and the left half of the green FOV) comprises a first set of wavelengths (blue and green), and wherein the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the upper half of the red FOV and the upper right quarter of the green FOV) comprises a second set of wavelengths (green and red) that is distinct from the first set (see figure 4 and paragraph 131-138). As per claim 14, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-6 and 8) redirecting the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements) toward an outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) (paragraphs 203-206) of the wave guide with a first exit pupil expander (first multiplying diffractive element Y) in the first optical path; and redirecting the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements) toward the outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) (paragraphs 207-210) with a second exit pupil expander (second multiplying diffractive element Y) disposed in the second optical path. As per claim 15, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) combining, with the outcoupler (out-coupling diffractive element Z) the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) and the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to display the final representation (paragraph 171). As per claim 16, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) receiving, with an incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) of the waveguide, the display light from an optical engine (projector 2); dividing, by the incoupler, the display light into at least the first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) and the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top); redirecting, by the incoupler, the first portion of the display light to propagate within the waveguide along the first optical path (along the direction of vector K1 see paragraphs 119, 126 and 203-206); and redirecting, by the incoupler, the second portion of the display light to propagate within the waveguide along the second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 208-210). As per claim 17, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) dividing the display light into a third portion of the display light (light which propagates through sets 1 and 2 of diffractive elements comprising the upper and lower quarters of the vertical FOV), and directing the third portion of the display light to propagate along a third optical path (along the direction of vector K6 see paragraphs 117-118, 126, and 195-202) that is distinct from the first optical path and the second optical path. As per claim 18, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) displaying the final representation by combining of the first portion of the display light, the second portion of the display light, and the third portion of the display light (see figure 7 and paragraphs 171-174). As per claim 19, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-3 and 5A-9) A projection system comprising: an optical engine (projector 2); and a waveguide (waveguide 1) comprising: an incoupler (in-coupling diffractive element X) configured to: receive display light representative of an image for display (paragraph 170); and direct a first portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within the waveguide along a first optical path (along the direction of vector K1 see paragraphs 119, 126 and 203-206) and a second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) to propagate within the waveguide along a second optical path (along direction of vector K2 see paragraphs 119, 126, 129, and 208-210), wherein the first optical path and the second optical path have respectively non-overlapping propagation angles; and combine the first portion of the display light and the second portion of the display light to display a final representation (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) of the image (with out-coupling diffractive element Z see paragraph 171) wherein the final representation has a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) (paragraphs 171-173). As per claim 20, Borisov teaches (in figures 2-6 and 8) that the waveguide is further configured to divide the display light into a third portion (light which propagates through sets 1 and 2 of diffractive elements comprising the upper and lower quarters of the vertical FOV), and to direct the third portion of the display light to propagate along a third optical path (along the direction of vector K6 see paragraphs 117-118, 126, and 195-202) that is distinct from the first optical path and the second optical path. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/16/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant’s argument that the cited reference fails to teach every limitation of the claimed invention. Specifically, applicant argues that Borisov fails to teach “the final representation has a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light”. This argument is unpersuasive. As shown in the rejection above, Borisov teaches (in figure 7) that the final representation (comprises full FOV for red, blue, and green light) has a spatial resolution that is greater than that of a first representation of the image conveyed by the first portion (light which propagates through set 3 of diffractive elements comprising the second quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) of the display light and greater than that of a second representation of the image conveyed by the second portion of the display light (light which propagates through set 4 of diffractive elements comprising the third quarter of the vertical FOV from the top) (paragraphs 171-173), that is the final image output by out-coupling diffractive element Z comprises a larger number of pixels than the first and second portions as the final image is the sum of the pixels in the first, second, and third portions each of which correspond to different spatial regions of the final image as shown in figure 7. Applicant’s argument is therefore unpersuasive and the rejection is maintained. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER P GROSS whose telephone number is (571)272-5660. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at (571) 272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER P GROSS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 16, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742535
AUTOMOTIVE MODULES AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736633
OPTICAL APPARATUS, IN-VEHICLE SYSTEM, MOVING APPARATUS, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF OPTICAL APPARATUS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736839
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724243
CAMERA OPTICAL LENS AND LENS ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717152
PROJECTION OPTICAL PATH AND PROJECTION DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+20.9%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month