Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/720,287

BRAKE SYSTEM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Dec 14, 2021 — DE 10 2021 214 332.6 +1 more
Examiner
TEKA, ABIY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Continental AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
581 granted / 686 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 686 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites the limitation " the at least four inlet valves.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claims 15-26 are also rejected for being dependent on a rejected base claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14- are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zimmermann (DE 102017216617) Regarding Claim 14 Zimmermann teaches a brake system for a motor vehicle having at least four hydraulically actuatable wheel brakes (8a-d), said brake system comprising: a first electrically actuatable pressure source (5); a first electronic control device (A); a second electrically actuatable pressure source (2); wherein the first pressure source (5) and the second pressure source (2) are connected to a brake supply line (13a-b) to which the at least four inlet valves (6a-6d) are connected (Fig 1); an electrically actuatable inlet valve (6a-d) for each wheel brake (Fig 1); an electrically actuatable outlet valve (7a-d) for each wheel brake (Fig 1); a second electronic control device (B); and a pressure medium reservoir (4); an electrically actuatable circuit separation valve (62)arranged in the brake supply line (13a-b) in such a manner that, when the circuit separation valve (62) is closed, the brake supply line (13a-b) is hydraulically separated into a first line section (13b) and a second line section (13a), wherein the first line section (13b) is hydraulically connected to the second pressure source (2) and at least two (6a-b) of the at least four inlet valves (6a-6d), and the second line section (13a) is hydraulically connected to the first pressure source (5) and the other two (6c-6d) of the at least four inlet valves (6a-6d); wherein the first electronic control device (A) activates the first pressure source (5), the second electronic control device (B) activates the second pressure source (2) and the inlet and outlet valves (6a-d,7a-d) and the circuit separation valve (62) is activated by the second electronic control device (B) (see Fig 1, par.0063). Regarding Claim 15 Zimmermann teaches a first electrical partition (collection of devices linked to controller A) and a second electrical partition (collection of devices linked to controller B) which are electrically independent of one another (Controllers A and B are separate and independent), wherein the first pressure source (5) and the first electronic control device (A) are assigned to the first electrical partition (Collection) and the second pressure source (5), the second electronic control device (B), the inlet and outlet valves(6-7a-b), and the circuit separation valve (62) are assigned to the second electrical partition (collection of devices linked to controller B) (Fig 1, Par.0059-0064). Regarding Claim 16 Zimmermann teaches wherein the first pressure source (5) is activated exclusively by the first electronic control device (A) and the second pressure source (2), the inlet and outlet valves (6-7A-B), and the circuit separation valve (62) are activated exclusively by the second electronic control device (SEE Fig 1, Par.0063). Regarding Claim 17 Zimmermann teaches further comprising: a first structural unit (housing of first control unit A) in which the first electrically actuatable pressure source (5) is arranged and which includes the first electronic control device (A); and a second structural unit (housing of second electronic unit B) in which the second electrically actuatable pressure source (2), the electrically actuatable inlet and outlet valves and the circuit separation valve (62) are arranged and which includes the second electronic control device (Fig 1 par.0008). Regarding Claim 20 Zimmermann teaches wherein the first pressure source (5) is connected to the brake supply line (13a-b) via an electrically actuatable first separation valve (26), wherein the separation valve (62)is activated by the second electronic control device (B) (Fig 1 par.0065) Regarding Claim 21 Zimmermann teaches wherein the first separation valve (26) is designed to be normally open (See Fig 1). Regarding Claim 22 Zimmermann teaches wherein the first pressure source (5) is connected to the pressure medium reservoir (4) via an electrically actuatable second separation valve (27) (then via chamber 72 and check valve 22), wherein the second separation valve (27) is activated by the first electronic control device (A) (claim 1). Regarding Claim 23 Zimmermann teaches wherein the second separation valve (27) is designed to be normally open (Claim 2). Regarding Claim 24 Zimmermann teaches wherein the first pressure source (5) is connected to the pressure medium reservoir (4) via a check valve (22) (the low path is valve 26,61, 27, chamber72 and check valve 22) which opens in the direction of the first pressure source (5) (Fig 1). Regarding Claim 25 Zimmermann teaches wherein, in addition to the first and second pressure source, the brake system does not include a further pressure source for building up a brake pressure for actuating the wheel brakes (Fig 1). Regarding Claim 26 Zimmermann teaches further comprising an actuating unit (1) for a vehicle driver, wherein the actuating unit is connected to at least one electronic control device (25, 65) for transmitting a driver demand signal and wherein there is no mechanical-hydraulic connection from the actuating unit to the wheel brakes (8a-8d) Allowable subject matter Claims 18-19 are rejected but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the above stated 112 rejection and including all the limitations of the base claims and all the intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIY TEKA whose telephone number is (571)272-9804. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11-9 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIY TEKA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12649214
POLISHING APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630132
PEDAL SIMULATOR FOR VEHICLE
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630285
LINEAR ACTUATOR
1y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617454
AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR
1y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612757
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM FOR WORK MACHINE, WORK MACHINE, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 686 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month