Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/720,296

ATTACHMENT COOLER OF A DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINE WITH PLATE COOLERS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2021 — EU 21214794.6 +1 more
Examiner
MATES, ROBERT E
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Innomotics GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
262 granted / 462 resolved
-11.3% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
495
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 462 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to papers filed on 4/27/2026. Amendments made to the claims and the Applicant's remarks have been entered and considered. Claims 16-33 have been withdrawn. Election/Restrictions Claims 16-33 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to nonelected embodiments, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 4/27/2026. Applicant's election with traverse of claims 14-15 in the reply filed on 4/27/2026 is acknowledged. The first ground of traversal is that Paek (WO2015102388A1) does not show the features of claims 14 or 28. This argument is persuasive because Paek does not show the hollow pipes 41 are embodied as plate heat exchangers, and Paek is not applied in the current rejection. The Applicant also argued that Thode (US 4,348,604 A) neither discloses a central channel nor any kind of module, which is received in a receiving opening and which would be removable without resulting in a bypass/shortcut. Thode only discloses single heat exchanger plates (which are called "plate modules"), which are principally removeable individually but a removing of a plate would set the cooler non-operable. This argument is moot because Klimt (US 2004/0222711 A1) shows all of the features of claims 14 and 28 as demonstrated in the rejection below. Regarding Klimt, the Applicant argued that Klimt discloses a plate heat exchanger for an electric machine wherein single plates of the heat exchanger are changeable. However, neither does Klimt disclose a central channel nor any kind of removeable module, which are inserted into receiving openings. If a plate is removed, a bypass/shortcut result and the heat exchanger is set non-operable. Also, Klimt does not disclose that waste air from the secondary circuit is discharged to a side of the cooler. This is not found persuasive because, regarding annotated FIG. 6 below, Klimt shows a central channel A in a heat exchanger 29 between OP and 40Z. Individual modules are made of plates 6 and mechanically connected together which implies that they are inserted into openings in the casing of the heat exchanger 29 and they can also be removed (FIG. 6, para [0048]). The modules do not require additional interior air guides para [0059] so there is no flow bypass created by an unoccupied receiving opening, nor is a bypass disclosed. Klimt shows waste air exiting the heat exchanger 29 at 40Z (annotated FIG. 6 below). Therefore, Groups I-XIV lack unity of invention because claims 14 and 28 do not recite special technical features as all recited features are shown by Klimt (US 2004/0222711 A1). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Klimt (US 2004/0222711 A1 of record). As to claim 14, Klimt shows (FIG. 7, 6): PNG media_image1.png 932 793 media_image1.png Greyscale An attachment cooler 29 of a dynamo-electric machine 23,24, said attachment cooler 29 being embodied as a heat exchanger and comprising: a primary circuit B for flow of a medium; a secondary circuit L separate from the primary circuit B for flow of a medium, said secondary circuit including a central channel A and a waste air channel Z; a casing K including receiving openings OP and designed to accommodate the central channel A and the waste channel 40Z of the secondary circuit L, with the waste channel 40Z leading out to a side of the casing K; and exchangeable modules 42 embodied as plate heat exchangers and insertable in the receiving openings of the casing K, each of the modules 42 designed for individual removal, without a flow bypass being created by unoccupied ones of the receiving openings (para [0022], modules 42 of plate heat exchangers para [0055]; the modules do not require additional interior air guides para [0059] so there is no flow bypass created by an unoccupied receiving opening, nor is a bypass disclosed). As to claim 15/14, Klimt further shows (FIG. 7, 6 above) wherein the central channel A extends parallel to an axis of the casing K (parallel to the axis of the machine the shaft 36). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E MATES whose telephone number is (571)270-5293. The examiner can normally be reached M to F 12:00pm to 8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TULSIDAS PATEL can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT E MATES/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /TULSIDAS C PATEL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700773
ROTOR MODULE WITH COOLING STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695344
HYBRID ROTOR MODULE WITH CLUTCH ASSEMBLIES AND COOLING OF ROTOR AND STATOR
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695359
ELECTRIC MACHINE WITH AN END WINDING COOLING ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683441
AIRGAP COOLING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665471
ELECTRIC DRIVE ASSEMBLY WITH COOLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+35.5%)
3y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 462 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month