Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/720,550

MARKING DEVICE TRACKING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Dec 16, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2021063742
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
HP Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
434 granted / 545 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
555
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 6 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kahle et al. (US Pub. No. 2012/0323534). Regarding claim 1, Kahle et al. discloses: A computer-implemented method for determining a set of locations for placement of an optical measurement station for a marking device, comprising: receiving site layout information including location information of a plurality of marking targets on a site (0007, 0010-0011, 0020, 0026, 0028); defining potential optical obstructions to the optical measurement station in the site based on the site layout information (0019-0020, 0027, 0029); and determining a set of locations for placement of the optical measurement station on the site based on the plurality of marking targets and the defined potential optical obstructions (0007, 0010, 0020, 0026-0027, 0033-0034). Regarding claims 2-3, 5-6 and 10, these features are known from Kahle et al. (0007-0011, 0019-0020, 0026-0029, 0033-0034, FIGS 1-4). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 7-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 12, the prior art of record neither discloses nor suggests that the controller is designed to define a marking target list comprising a plurality of marking targets and their location information based on the site layout plan; determine, for each station placement location, the visible marking targets from the marking target list; and add a station placement location with a greatest number of marking targets visible from that location to the placement list. Regarding claim 15, the prior art of record neither discloses nor suggests that the instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: define a marking target list comprising a plurality of marking targets and their location information based on the site layout plan; determine, for each station placement location the marking targets from the marking target list visible from the placement location and the total number of marking targets that are visible from the station placement location; and add a station placement location with a greatest number of visible marking targets to a station placement list. Therefore, claims 12-15 are allowable. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 26 JUN 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680839
APPARATUS, DISC, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681029
AUTOMATIC MEASURING SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC MEASURING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680806
IMPROVED CONTACTLESS DETECTION OF VIBRATIONS IN METAL BELTS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674665
ROVER ORIENTATION MEASUREMENT FOR SURVEYING TILT ORIENTATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669328
CONSTRUCTION SURFACE FLATNESS DETECTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month