Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/720,746

SHOES CARE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 17, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0182007 +1 more
Examiner
LAUX, DAVID J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
563 granted / 864 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
897
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 864 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Application Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to Applicant’s submissions dated 06/17/2024 & 09/11/2026. Claim(s) 16–35 are pending. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 16–25 & 35 in the reply filed on 09/11/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16–25 & 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2021-040909 to Hiroto et al (citations directed to the attached machine translation) in view of KR 2006-0085979 to Cho (citations directed to the attached machine translation). With regard to claim 16, Hiroto discloses a shoe care device (¶ 0001) comprising: an inner cabinet (10) having an accommodation space (20 configured to accommodate shoes (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0033–0034); a connection path defining a flow path (30) through which air in the accommodation space (20) is introduced thereinto and then discharged therefrom into the accommodation space (20) (Fig. 1; ¶ 0037); a blower (26) located in the connection path (30) (Fig. 1; 0037), the blower (36) being configured to move the air along the connection path (30) (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0037, 0041); a dehumidifier (32) located in the connection path (30) (Fig. 1; ¶ 0037), the dehumidifier (32) being configured to dehumidify the air in the connection path (30) (¶ 0039); a door (11) configured to open and close the inner cabinet (10) (Fig. 1; ¶ 0033); and a control panel (18) located at the door (11) (Fig. 14–1; ¶ 0089), the control panel (18) being configured to input a control signal for the shoe care device (¶ 0089), the control panel (18) including: a fixed user interface (UI) section including a first control UI (Fig. 14–1; ¶ 0089). Hiroto fails to disclose a variable UI section inclined with respect to the fixed UI section, the variable UI section being configured to display a second control UI. Cho teaches a variable UI section (64) inclined with respect to the fixed UI section (71–74) (Fig. 3; ¶ 0023), the variable UI section (64) being configured to display a second control UI (64) (Fig. 3; ¶ 0023). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the shoe care apparatus of Hiroto with dual UIs of Cho because such a combination would have had the added benefit of allowing the user to see and enter additional information and select available options. With regard to claim 17, Hiroto further discloses the fixed UI section (18) is parallel to a front surface of the door (11) (Fig. 14–1; ¶ 0089). With regard to claim 18, Hiroto as previously combined with Cho further discloses variable UI section (Cho: 64) is located above the fixed UI section (Hiroto: 18; Cho: 71–74) (Hiroto: Fig. 14–1; ¶ 0089; Cho: Fig. 3; ¶ 0023). With regard to claim 19, Hiroto as previously combined with Cho further discloses the variable UI section (Cho: 64) is inclined to be spaced further away from the front surface of the door (Cho: 22) in an upward direction (Cho: Fig. 3; ¶ 0023). With regard to claim 20, Hiroto as previously combined with Cho further discloses the fixed UI section (Cho: 71–74) and the variable UI section (Cho: 64) are connected by a bent connection portion (Cho: 60) (Cho: Fig. 3; ¶ 0023). With regard to claim 21, Hiroto fails to disclose the fixed UI section and the variable UI section are integrally formed. It would have been obvious at the time the application was filed to have the fixed UI section and the variable UI section integrally formed, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA 1965). With regard to claim 22, Hiroto further discloses the first control UI comprises at least one of: a power UI configured to select whether to turn the shoe care device on or off (¶¶ 0093–0099, 0102–0109); and an operation UI configured to select whether to operate the shoe care device (¶¶ 0093–0099, 0102–0109). With regard to claim 23, Hiroto as previously combined with Cho further discloses the second control UI (Cho: 64) comprises at least one of: a mode UI configured to select a mode type of the shoe care device (Hiroto: ¶¶ 0097, 0102; as combined, having two display units instead of one would allow some of the information to be presented on the second screen); a material UI configured to select a material type of the shoes accommodated in the shoe care device (Hiroto: ¶¶ 0097, 0102; as combined, having two display units instead of one would allow some of the information to be presented on the second screen); and a time UI configured to select an operation time of the shoe care device (Hiroto: ¶¶ 0093, 0098; as combined, having two display units instead of one would allow some of the information to be presented on the second screen). With regard to claim 24, Hiroto further discloses the fixed UI section (18) is configured to display the first control UI in response to a touch input (¶¶ 0089–0090, 0093, 0102). With regard to claim 25, Hiroto as previously combined with Cho further discloses the variable UI section is configured to: display the second control UI (Cho: 64) in response to a touch input (Hiroto: ¶¶ 0089–0090, 0093, 0102; Cho: Fig. 3; ¶ 0023; since Hiroto discloses a first touch screen, when adding a second screen as taught by Cho it would be obvious to use the same type of touch screen, which is merely a duplication of parts); and adjust the at least one of the mode UI, the material UI, and the time UI in response to a sliding input (Hiroto: ¶¶ 0089–0090, 0093, 0102; touch screens, such as those on a phone, are known to operate by both tapping and sliding movements). With regard to claim 35, Hiroto further discloses the control panel (18) is disposed on an upper end of the door (11) (Fig. 14). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: see PTO-892 attached. Applicant is encouraged to review the cited references prior to submitting a response to this office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID J LAUX whose telephone number is (571)270-7619. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helena Kosanovic can be reached at (571) 272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID J LAUX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 October 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768594
Electrode Sheet Drying Device and Drying Method
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768549
REDUCTIVE DEHUMIDIFIER WITH BUILT-IN HEATING DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768592
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DRYING CANNABIS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760970
TREATMENT MODULE FOR A TREATMENT TUNNEL, TREATMENT TUNNEL, AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM FOR A TREATMENT MODULE
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765301
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPLYING GAS, FACILITY FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATE
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+28.5%)
3y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 864 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month