Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/721,097

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, UNPACKING, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTERS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2021 — provisional 63/289,721 +6 more
Examiner
HENSON, KATINA N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Velo3D Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
387 granted / 684 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
72 currently pending
Career history
743
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.0%
+13.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 684 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Status of Claims Claims 63 – 64 are pending. Claims 2 – 3, 6, 8 – 19, 22 – 23, 26 – 46, 48, 51 and 59 – 62 are cancelled. Claims 1, 4 – 5, 7, 20 – 21, 24 – 25, 47, 49 – 50 and 52 – 58 are allowed Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/17/2024 was filed before the first office action. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, line 15 “is” after second conduit needs to be deleted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 63 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 63 recites the limitation "the long axis" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of examination, the limitation will be examined as “a long axis”. Claim 63 recites the limitation "the amount" in line 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of examination, the limitation will be examined as “an amount”. Claim 64 is rejected as being a dependent of rejected claim 63. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4 – 5, 7, 20 – 21, 24 – 25, 47, 49 – 50 and 52 – 58 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The instant invention is neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by the prior art because the prior art fails to teach, suggest or make obvious the device being configured to reversibly toggle between orientations comprising a first orientation and a second orientation, the first orientation of the first conduit being is adjustable with respect to the second orientation of the second conduit along the long axis, wherein adjustment of the first conduit with respect to the second conduit alters the overlap between the first portion of the first conduit and the second portion of second conduit;, with the additional limitations of the claim. The closest prior art being Borrego, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2022/0219397 A1 and Frenchman et al. U. S. Patent Publication No. 20180281282 A1. Both Borrego and Frenchman teach a device for material removal, however, the references – alone or in combination, fail to teach, suggest or make obvious the device being configured to reversibly toggle between orientations comprising a first orientation and a second orientation, the first orientation of the first conduit being is adjustable with respect to the second orientation of the second conduit along the long axis, wherein adjustment of the first conduit with respect to the second conduit alters the overlap between the first portion of the first conduit and the second portion of second conduit. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claim 63 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for indication of allowable subject matter: The instant invention is neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by the prior art because the prior art fails to teach, suggest or make obvious the device being configured to reversibly toggle between a first orientation and a second orientation, the first orientation of the first conduit is adjustable with respect to the second orientation of the second conduit along a long axis, wherein adjustment of the first conduit with respect to the second conduit alters an amount of overlap between the first conduit and the second conduit, with the additional limitations of the claim. Claim 64 is rejected as a dependent of claim 63. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATINA N HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-8024. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday; 5:30am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATINA N. HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745885
CLEANING APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734558
AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLE CHARGE SHOE CLEANER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727659
FLEXIBLE HANDLE FOR MAKEUP APPLICATOR
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727980
ELECTRIC TOOTHBRUSH WITH CONTROLLED SUCTION AND IRRIGATION
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727732
CLEANING ROBOT SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 684 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month