Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/721,105

ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK MEMBER, ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK MEMBER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2021 — JP 2021-210715 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DANNY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1225 granted / 1359 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.0%
+16.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 1, 2, 6, 9, 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Ishikawa et al (USPN 2022/0216086). Regarding claim 1, Ishikawa discloses an electrostatic chuck member (an electrostatic chuck device 10, see figures 1, 3-4) comprising: a dielectric substrate (20, 70) having a placement surface (20a, b) on which a sample (a wafer W) is mounted, wherein a direction orthogonal to the placement surface is a thickness direction (a thickness direction includes a thickness of 20, 70) thereof; and an adsorption electrode (electrodes 22) which is embedded in the dielectric substrate (20), wherein a gas flow path (a gas flow path 30, see figures 3, 4), which extends along a planar direction of the placement surface (20a,b) (multiple gas flow paths 30 formed circumferentially the surface 20a, b of the ceramic plate 20, 70 see par. 0025, and figure 5) is provided in the dielectric substrate (20), the gas flow path (30) has an inner surface (32) which includes a bottom surface portion (30a) that faces the same direction as the placement surface (20a), a top surface portion (31) that faces the bottom surface portion (31a), and a pair of side surface portions (33) that connect the bottom surface portion (31a) and the top surface portion (31), wherein at least one of the side surface portions (33) is inclined with respect to the thickness direction (the thickness of the plate 20, 70)(see figure 5). Regarding claim 2, Ishikawa discloses wherein the gas flow path extends in an arc shape with respect to a center of the dielectric substrate (a segment of the gas flow paths 30 are formed circumferentially the surface 20a, b of the ceramic plate 20 formed an arc shape, see par. 0025, and figure 5). Regarding claim 6, Yamaguchi discloses wherein the dielectric substrate (20) includes a first supporting plate (20) and a second supporting plate (70) which are stacked in the thickness direction, and the gas flow path (30) is provided between the first supporting plate and the second supporting plate (see figure ). Regarding claim 9, Ishikawa discloses a base (a base 60) that supports the electrostatic chuck member (20) from a side opposite to the placement surface. Regarding claim 14, Ishikawa discloses wherein a cross-section of the gas flow path (the gas flow path 30) in a radical direction has a trapezoidal shape or a substantially trapezoidal shape (the gas flow path 30 has a trapezoidal shape shown in figure 5). Regarding claim 15, Ishikawa discloses wherein the bottom surface portion (30a) and the top surface portion (31) of the gas flow path are parallel to each other, and a dimension in a radical direction of the bottom surface portion (30a) is larger than that of the top surface portion in a plan view (31)(see figure 5). Regarding claim 16, Ishikawa discloses wherein the gas flow path extends in a ring shape in a plan view (see par. 0025), and a dimension in a radical direction of the bottom surface portion (31a) is larger than that of the top surface portion (31) in a plan view (see figure 5). Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 3-5, 7-8, 10-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANNY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2054. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-271-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANNY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683379
OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE AND CHARGING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671353
MICROSTRUCTURED FIELD EFFECT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671246
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROTECTION OF ELECTRIC NETWORKS AND DEVICES FROM EXTREME TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC SURGES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665589
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT COMPRISING A HOTSPOT DETECTION CIRCUIT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665115
SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month