Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/721,124

ROTATED ANTENNA ARRAYS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Priority
Feb 25, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022077907
Examiner
LEE, JOHN J
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1207 granted / 1301 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1319
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1301 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 10-12, 15-17, 20, 22, 24, 26, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gil et al. (US 11,177,990). Regarding claim 1, Gil teaches that a method for wireless communication at a first device (abstract and Fig. 2). Gil teaches that transmitting signaling from a first antenna array (Fig. 2) comprising a first set of antenna subarrays at the first device to a second antenna array comprising a second set of antenna subarrays at a second device (Fig. 2, 3 and column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, where teaches a first antenna array having first set pf antenna subarrays at first device and second antenna array having second set of antenna subarrays second device), each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays comprises one or more antenna elements (Fig. 2, 3 and column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, where teaches each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays having one or more antenna elements), a first axis that intersects an antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and a centroid of a first shape is offset from a vertical direction by a first angular offset (Fig. 3, 7, column 3, lines 16 – column 4, lines 64, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17), each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays disposed along a perimeter of the first shape (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17), and for each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays (Fig. 3, 7), a respective angular offset between a respective axis that intersects the antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays and a centroid of a second shape is offset from the vertical direction by a respective angular offset different than the first angular offset (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17, where teaches a transmitter may generate Orbital angular momentum OAM multimode signals using different types of antennas, and even in this case, a receiver may use a radial concentric UCA as a receiving antenna, and OAM multiplexing is a technology for increasing the system capacity and the frequency efficiency of a wireless communication system by mode-division multiplexing OAM modes having different helical phase fronts through the same wireless communication channel), each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays disposed along a perimeter of the second shape (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17, where teaches the OAM-based communication, in the radial concentric UCA structure antenna, the plurality of UCA antennas are arranged on the same plane or different planes on the basis of a central axis of the radial concentric UCA structure antenna). Regarding claim 4, Gil teaches that the first set of antenna subarrays at the first device and the second set of antenna subarrays at the second device both comprise a same quantity of antenna subarrays (claim 1, Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17). Regarding claim 6, Gil teaches that the first shape is a first circle, and the second shape is a second circle (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17). Regarding claim 8, Gil teaches that the first shape is a first quadrilateral; and the second shape is a second quadrilateral (Fig. 2, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17). Regarding claim 10, Gil teaches that a size of the first shape is the same as a size of the second shape, the size comprising an area, a perimeter distance, a circumference, a diameter, or any combination thereof of the first shape and the second shape (Fig. 4, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17). Regarding claim 11, Gil teaches that a size of the first shape is different than a size of the second shape, the size of the first shape comprising a first area, a first perimeter distance, a first circumference, a first diameter, or any combination thereof of the first shape, and the size of the second shape comprising a second area, a second perimeter distance, a second circumference, a second diameter, or any combination thereof of the second shape (Fig. 2, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17). Regarding claim 12, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claim 1. Furthermore, Gil teaches that Gil teaches that receiving signaling from a first antenna array (Fig. 2) comprising a first set of antenna subarrays at the first device to a second antenna array comprising a second set of antenna subarrays at a second device (Fig. 2, 3 and column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, where teaches a first antenna array having first set pf antenna subarrays at first device and second antenna array having second set of antenna subarrays second device), each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays comprises one or more antenna elements (Fig. 2, 3 and column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, where teaches each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays having one or more antenna elements), a first axis that intersects an antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays and a centroid of a first shape is offset from a vertical direction by a first angular offset (Fig. 3, 7, column 3, lines 16 – column 4, lines 64, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17), each antenna subarray of the first set of antenna subarrays disposed along a perimeter of the first shape (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17), and for each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays (Fig. 3, 7), a respective angular offset between a respective axis that intersects the antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays and a centroid of a second shape is offset from the vertical direction by a respective angular offset different than the first angular offset (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17, where teaches a transmitter may generate Orbital angular momentum OAM multimode signals using different types of antennas, and even in this case, a receiver may use a radial concentric UCA as a receiving antenna, and OAM multiplexing is a technology for increasing the system capacity and the frequency efficiency of a wireless communication system by mode-division multiplexing OAM modes having different helical phase fronts through the same wireless communication channel), each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays disposed along a perimeter of the second shape (Fig. 3, 7, 8, column 3, lines 16 – column 5, lines 30, and column 17, lines 15 – column 18, lines 17, where teaches the OAM-based communication, in the radial concentric UCA structure antenna, the plurality of UCA antennas are arranged on the same plane or different planes on the basis of a central axis of the radial concentric UCA structure antenna). Regarding claim 15, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 4. Regarding claim 16, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 8. Regarding claim 17, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 12. Regarding claim 20, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 4. Regarding claim 22, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 6. Regarding claim 24, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 8. Regarding claim 26, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 12. Regarding claim 29, Gil teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 8. Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claims 2-3, 5, 7, 9, 13-14, 18-19, 21, 23, 25, 27-28, and 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record fails to disclose the limitation “within a set of angular offsets that comprises the respective angular offset for each antenna subarray of the second set of antenna subarrays, each other angular offset differs from the first angular offset by at least as much as a second angular offset; and a difference between the first angular offset and the second angular offset is based at least in part on a first quantity of antenna subarrays within the first set of antenna subarrays at the first device, a second quantity of antenna subarrays within the second set of antenna subarrays at the second device, or both” as specified the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. YAMADA et al. (US 2024/0322453) discloses Transmission Apparatus and Transmission Method. Alavi et al. (US 11,153,002) discloses Orbital Angular Momentum-Based Multiplexing with Shared Antenna Elements. Information regarding...Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system... at 866-217-9197 (toll-free)." Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7880. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri (8:00am-5:00pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuwen Pan can be reached on 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. J.L June 25, 2026 John J Lee /JOHN J LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683679
LOW DATA VOLUME SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684491
Method and Apparatus for Determining Transmit Power
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684493
OPTIMIZED HANDLING FOR TRANSMIT POWER BACKOFFS TO ENABLE UPLINK TRANSMIT POWER BOOST
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684496
Transmit Power Priority Based on Cell Types in Wireless Devices
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684497
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATION IN 6 GHz AND COEXISTENCE WITH INCUMBENTS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1301 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month