Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/721,185

FACILITY FOR COOLING A GAS FLOW CONTAINING CO2 AND METHOD USING SUCH A FACILITY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 17, 2021 — FR FR2113862 +1 more
Examiner
ORLANDO, AMBER ROSE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 671 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 671 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the stream" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the bottom end" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the tower" in line 12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the first portion of the water" in line 16. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitation “a portion of the water cooled in the heat exchanger” and is unclear if this refers back to “the first portion of the water” or a different portion of water. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the heat exchanger" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the tower" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 20 recites the limitation "the tower" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 17-19 depend from claim 14. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-20 would be allowed if written to overcome the 112(b) issues above. The closest prior art of record is shown below. Guillard US 5408831 discloses the claimed structure (figure 1) but does not disclose the method of using the structure as claimed, specifically the “the water pressurized by the pump is sent, without having been cooled, at a third temperature to an indirect heat exchanger located in the tower at a second level above the first level, wherein the temperature is higher than the second temperature but lower than the first temperature”. Brady US 5018457 discloses the gas stripper as well as water being split into different streams at the bottom of the stripper (figure 2, object 39) but does not disclose “the water removed at the bottom end of the scrubbing tower… the water pressurized by the pump is sent, without having been cooled, at a third temperature to an indirect heat exchanger located in the tower at a second level above the first level, wherein the temperature is higher than the second temperature but lower than the first temperature”. Lehto US 4,853,192 discloses the gas stripper as well as the indirect heat exchanger located in the lower at a second level above the first level (figure 2, objects 72 and 56). Sha US 3,775,532 discloses recycling the water from the bottom of the stripper and a reheater (figure, objects 24, 18 and 13). Pelman discloses a stripper system including a reheater at the top of the stripper (figure, objects 10 and 17). Castillo-Welter et al. discloses the recycling (figure 1 objects 12 and 3). Burbach US 3,726,239 discloses the stripper system, recycling the water back to the stripper system as well as a reheater (figure, objects 52, 67 and 58). The references do not disclose “the water removed at the bottom end of the scrubbing tower… the water pressurized by the pump is sent, without having been cooled, at a third temperature to an indirect heat exchanger located in the tower at a second level above the first level, wherein the temperature is higher than the second temperature but lower than the first temperature”. Angelini US 4,217,861 discloses a stripper system and the reheater being used in a recycle system (figure 1, objects 34 and 36, 38 and 40). The reference does not disclose the water removed at the bottom end of the scrubbing tower… the water pressurized by the pump is sent, without having been cooled, at a third temperature to an indirect heat exchanger located in the tower at a second level above the first level, wherein the temperature is higher than the second temperature but lower than the first temperature”. The closest prior art of record does not disclose “water is removed at the bottom end of the scribbing tower and pressurized in a pump, the water pressurized by the pump is sent, without having being cooled, at a third temperature to an indirect heat exchanger located in the tower at a second level above the first level, wherein the third temperature is higher than the second temperature but lower than the first temperature.” This limitation along with reasoning to combine with the references above could not be found within the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMBER ROSE ORLANDO whose telephone number is (571)270-3149. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexa Neckel can be reached at (571) 272-2450. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. AMBER ROSE ORLANDO Primary Examiner Art Unit 1731 /AMBER R ORLANDO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12709557
Highly Configurable Adaptable Mobile Deionization Trailer
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12678730
MIXED GAS SEPARATION METHOD AND MIXED GAS SEPARATION DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662403
PHOTOSWITCHABLE GUANIDINIUM COMPOUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF OXYANIONS FROM LIQUID SOLUTIONS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661612
CARBON DIOXIDE RECOVERY SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12584201
ITEM MADE OF PRECIOUS CERMET
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.7%)
2y 11m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month