Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/721,408

A ROOFTOP TENT

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 18, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2021 — SO 2021/10951 +1 more
Examiner
CANFIELD, ROBERT
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rebecca Goodwin
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
882 granted / 1160 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1182
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1160 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This office action is in response to the amendment filed 6/12/26. Claims 1, 2, 4-7 and 11 are pending. Claims 3, 8-10 and 12-15 have been canceled. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The substitute specification filed 6/12/26 has not been entered because it does not conform to 37 CFR 1.125(b) and (c) because: it was not accompanied by the lack of new matter statement required by 37 CFR 1.125(b). While there is a no new matter statement provide on page 1 of the remarks it is directed towards the claims and does not specifally address the substitute specification. The disclosure remains objected to for the reasons enumerated in section 4 of the office action mailed 2/12/26. These objections will be overcome with entry of the substitute specification filed 6/12/26. The substitute specification will be entered when applicant files the required no new matter statement. “The substitute specification field 6/12/26 contains no new matter”. Appropriate correction is required. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the second load bearing panel being convexly curved must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-7 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. No support is found int eh original disclosure for the second load bearing panel being convexly curved. Original paragraph [0015] of page 10 describes the sidewall 50 circumscribing the second load bearing panel 48 as convexly curved but not the second panel 48 itself as is not claimed. While Dunn 2022/0396967 provides convex side 122/124/134/152 and corner 132/136/144/148 panels circumscribing a convex top panel 120 the examiner agrees they are not curved but angularly bent. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT CANFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6840. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6, some Saturdays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ROBERT CANFIELD Primary Examiner Art Unit 3636 /Robert Canfield/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 12, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698640
TELESCOPIC POLES AND TENT FRAME HAVING SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692008
EVACUATION INFLATABLE HAVING SELF-HEALING FABRIC
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690649
VENTED CANOPY SYSTEM FOR UMBRELLAS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12671134
UMBRELLA HUB AND BATTERY PACK ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668293
Wagon with Folding Canopy for Carrying Children
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.2%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1160 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month