Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/721,707

Compositions for providing parenteral nutrition to pediatric patients

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jun 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2021 — EU 21216240.8 +1 more
Examiner
HUANG, GIGI GEORGIANA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allowance Rate
194 granted / 610 resolved
-28.2% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Status of Application Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-20 are present for examination at this time. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim recited the inclusion of soybean oil, medium-chain triglyceride, olive oil, and fish oil which is indefinite as the independent claim recites the presence of caprylic acid and capric acid in triglyceride form which are medium chain triglycerides wherein the recitation for medium chain triglycerides is unclear. Is it the same triglycerides of caprylic acid and capric acid? Are they different? It does not allow one to ascertain the metes and bounds of the claim as written. Claims 4-15, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “preferably” renders the claims and its dependent claims indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. It does not allow one to ascertain the metes and bounds of the claims as written. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 8, 11, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho et al. (WO 2020/159251) in view of Viola et al. (Virgin olive oil as a fundamental nutritional component and skin protector-Abstract only), Trouilly et al. (WO 2019/232044), Yin (L-Cysteine metabolism and its nutritional implications-Abstract only), and Abele et al. (U.S. Pat. Pub. 2013/0020226). Rejection: Cho et al. teaches pharmaceutical composition that is a 3 chamber bag where: a chamber contains sugars including glucose, another chamber contains amino acids and electrolytes, another chamber with fats. Sugars include glucose which is preferred, the amount of glucose can be 46.1-46.3g per 100ml; glucose monohydrate if an infusion preparation, and may be 14.2-14.4 per 100ml [61]. Carriers include saline , sterilized water, Ringer’s solution, buffered saline, dextrose solution, glycerol, maltodextrin solution, and a combination of at least one components, cand other conventional additives like antioxidants, buffers, bacteriostatic agents [33]. The amino acids include free amino acids and salt forms, and be at least one from the group consisting of L-alanine, L-arginine, glycine, L-histidine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, L-proline, L-serine, taurine, L-threonine, L-tryptophan, L-tyrosine, L-valine and L-glutamic acid. The amino acid salt forms may be at least one selected from the group consisting of inorganic acid salts such as L-arginine hydrochloride, L-histidine hydrochloride, L-lysine hydrochloride, etc.; L-lysine acetate; and L-lysine malate [55]. The preparation may contain 2.05-2.10 g of L-alanine, 1.10-1.20 g of L-arginine, 0.98-1.08 g of glycine, 0.45-0.50 g of L-histidine, 0.50-0.70 g of L-isoleucine, 0.68-0.78 g of L-leucine, 0.715-0.735 g of L-lysine hydrochloride, 0.30-0.50 g of L-methionine, 0.50-0.62 g of L-phenylalanine, 0.63-0.73 g of L-proline, 0.40-0.60 g of L-serine, 0.05-0.15 g of taurine, 0.37-0.47 g of L-threonine, 0.13-0.23 g of L-tryptophan, 0.03-0.05 g of L-tyrosine and 0.53-0.63 g of L-valine based on 100 mL of the chamber fluid [57]. Electrolytes including calcium, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, chlorine; like calcium phosphate and magnesium phosphate and sodium chloride [52-54] The chamber with fats Include omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids may be 47-53mg/ml, omega -3 may be from 23-27mg/ml, omega-6 fatty acids from 20-30mg/ml, including linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid [18-20, 24]. The composition contains at least one oil including fish oil, soybean oil, olive oil, cottonseed oil, safflower il, sesame oil, coconut oil, and corn oil [38-39]. The oil can further contain a synthetic oil like medium chain triglyceride [40]. Particularly, the pharmaceutical composition may contain 3.0 g to 5.0 g of soybean oil, 3.5 g to 4.5 g of medium chain triglyceride, 5.0 g to 6.0 g of olive oil, and 6.0 g to 7.0 g of fish oil based on the total 100 ml of the composition, and more particularly may contain 4 g of soybean oil, 4 g of medium chain triglyceride, 5.5 g of olive oil, and 6.5 g of fish oil based on the total 100 ml of the composition, which may be appropriately adjusted in the range that maintains the weight ratio of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids [41]. Example 2 contains a chamber with amino acids and electrolytes- L-alanine, L-arginine, glycine, L-histidine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine hydrochloride, L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, L-proline, L-serine, taurine, L-threonine, L-tryptophan, L-tyrosine, L-valine, calcium chloride dihydrate, sodium glycerophosphate anhydrous, sodium acetate hydrate, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, potassium chloride and zinc sulfate heptahydrate; another chamber with glucose monohydrate solution, and another with fats including soybean oil, medium chain triglyceride, olive oil, fish oil ([91-97], Tables 1-3). The volume ratio of the amino acid to sugar/glucose to fats may be 2.66:1.59:1, 2.24:3.86:1 but the volume ratio is not limited and may be divided according to criteria for nutritional calories ([64], see full document specifically areas cited). While Cho et al. does not teach the exact claimed values for some of the amino acids, glucose, and EPA/DHA; they are taught to be included and some have overlapping ranges wherein optimization of the component around the suggested ranges to attain the desired therapeutic/nutrition profile is prima facie obvious with a reasonable expectation of success. Cho et al. does not expressly recite the presence of oleic acid, L-cysteine, caprylic acid, capric acid, and the dependent range for total amino acids; but does recite the inclusion of olive oil, amino acids, and medium chain triglycerides. Viola et al. teaches that olive oil contains 98-99% fatty acid triglycerides which is mainly oleic (abstract). Trouilly et al. teaches that parenteral compositions contain amino acids formulations typically include 2-10 grams of amino acids per 100ml includes cysteine, alanine, arginine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, and lysine [135]. Yin et al. teaches that L-cysteine is a nutritionally semi-essential amino acid and plays an important role in cellular homeostasis (abstract). Abele et al. teaches known medium chain triglycerides include caprylic acid and capric acid [65]. Wherein it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate oleic acid, L-cysteine, caprylic acid, and capric acid as suggested by Viola et al, Trouilly et al., Yin et al. and Abele et al. and produce the claimed invention; as Cho et al. teaches the inclusion of olive oil which is primarily oleic acid as established by Viola, and teaches the inclusion of amino acids and medium chain triglycerides where the inclusion of additional amino acids like semi-essential amino acids like L-cysteine as addressed by Trouilly et al. Yin et al., and known medium chain triglycerides like caprylic acid and capric acid as established by Abele et al. for their known purpose is prima facie obvious with a reasonable expectation of success. It is also prima facie obvious to optimize the amount of amino acids within their known ranges and known types of medium chain triglyceride to attain the desired therapeutic/nutritional profile with a reasonable expectation of success absent evidence of criticality for the recited range. It is noted that the claims are composition/product claims, not method of use claims; and the prior art meets the structural components of the compositions in the 3-chambers wherein it is capable of the future intended use recited for its administration at the future combination ratios of the various contents of the different chambers. Claims 6-7, 9-10, 12-15, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho et al. (WO 2020/159251) in view of Viola et al. (Virgin olive oil as a fundamental nutritional component and skin protector-Abstract only), Trouilly et al. (WO 2019/232044), Yin (L-Cysteine metabolism and its nutritional implications), and Abele et al. (U.S. Pat. Pub. 2013/0020226) as applied to claims 1-5, 8, 11, 16 above, further in view of Brandenburger et al. (WO 2020/038941). U.S. Pat. Pub. 2021/0169739 is the national stage of WO 2020/038941 and will be used as the English translation. All references are to the U.S. Pat. Pub. Rejection: The teachings of Cho et al. in view of Viola et al., Trouilly et al., Yin, and Abele et al. are addressed above. Cho et al. in view of Viola et al., Trouilly et al., Yin, and Abele et al. does not expressly teach the volume of the chambers, but is directed to infusion 3 chamber bag. Brandenburger et al. teaches that infusion bags can be a multi-chamber bag such as a three chamber bag for parenteral nutrition where each chamber in each case contains a constituent (glucose, amino acids, lipids) [81] which can be a total capacity of up to 3000ml, and can have a storage capacity of 50-1000ml-in particular per chamber [27]. Wherein it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize the volume of each chamber as suggested by Brandenburger et al. and produce the claimed invention; as it is prima facie obvious to one of skill in the art to optimize the volume of the chamber for each constituent (glucose, amino acids, lipids) around the known volumes for chambers for infusion bag to attain the desired therapeutic/nutritional profile with a reasonable expectation of success absent evidence of criticality for the claimed values. Conclusion Claims 1-20 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GIGI GEORGIANA HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-9073. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9:00-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Kwon can be reached at 571-272-0581. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GIGI G HUANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685723
ORAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING ZONISAMIDE AND PROCESS OF PREPARATION THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12558419
ALLERGEN DESENSITIZATION METHOD
6m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12527738
LIQUID DEPOT FOR NON-INVASIVE SUSTAINED DELIVERY OF AGENTS TO THE EYE
11m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12491179
ORAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING ZONISAMIDE AND PROCESS OF PREPARATION THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12419990
OPHTHALMIC VISCOELASTIC COMPOSITIONS
6y 10m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+30.8%)
3y 11m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month