Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/722,017

POWER CONFIGURATION METHOD FOR TERMINAL, APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 31, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021143891
Examiner
TRAN, TUAN A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
669 granted / 786 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 7-9, 19-24 and 26-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yang (2023/0051285). Regarding claim 9, Yang discloses a method configuring a power of a terminal, performed by the terminal (See fig. 17), the method and comprising: receiving power configuration information for transmitting a predetermined service, wherein the predetermined service includes at least one of a New Radio (NR) service or an NR SL (Sidelink) service (See fig. 17, step S1702 and par [0071-0072]), and wherein the power configuration information indicates a power parameter (See par [0072]); and transmitting the at least one of the NR service or the NR SL service based on the power parameter (See fig. 17, steps S1703-S1705 and par [0374, 0376]). Claims 28-29 are rejected for the same reasons as set forth in claim 9, as apparatus. Regarding claim 19, Yang discloses a communication device (i.e. base station such as eNB or gNB), comprising: a processor and a memory storing instructions executable by the processor (See figs. 2, 7), wherein the processor is configured to: determine, according to a working state of the terminal (i.e. RF structure Type, capability information may include (i) information on whether the transmission timing for the SL transmission and the transmission timing for the UL transmission can be independently determined, (ii) whether it is possible to independently determine the transmission power for the SL transmission and the transmission power for the UL transmission, and/or (iii) information on whether separate antennas are supported for the SL transmission and the UL transmission) (See par [0371]), a power parameter for the terminal to transmit a predetermined service, wherein the predetermined service includes at least one of a New Radio (NR) service or an NR SL (Sidelink) service (See fig. 17, step S1702 and par [0372, 0377]), and the working state includes one of: a first working state indicating a state in which the NR SL service is transmitted by the terminal on a shared spectrum; or a second working state indicating a state in which the NR service and the NR SL service are transmitted by the terminal on the shared spectrum (See par [0171, 0371]). Claim 1 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 19, as method. Claim 20 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 19, as apparatus. Regarding claim 21, Yang discloses as cited in claim 19. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: determine, according to the working state of the terminal, the power parameter based on a configured parameter, wherein the configured parameter includes at least one of: a first parameter, which is a power for the terminal to transmit the NR SL service (See par [0239, 0243, 0372, 0377]); or a second parameter, which is a maximum transmit power (based on closed loop power control) of the terminal when transmitting the NR service in a cell (See par [0239, 0372, 0377]). Claim 2 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 21, as method. Regarding claim 22, Yang discloses as cited in claim 21. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: in response to the terminal being in the first working state, determine the power parameter to be a smaller parameter among the configured parameter (See par [0239]). Claim 3 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 22, as method. Regarding claim 23, Yang discloses as cited in claim 21. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: in response to the terminal being in the first working state, determine the power parameter to be the first parameter (See par [0239, 0243, 0372, 0377]). Claim 4 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 23, as method. Regarding claim 24, Yang discloses as cited in claim 21. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: in response to the terminal being in the second working state and transmitting the NR service and the NR SL service in a Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) mode (See par [0171-0173]), determine the power parameter for transmitting the NR service to be the second parameter and/or determine the power parameter for transmitting the NR SL service to be a smaller parameter among the configured parameter (See par [0239, 0243]). Claim 5 is rejected for the reasons as set forth in claim 24, as method. Regarding claim 26, Yang discloses as cited in claim 19. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: determine the working state of the terminal according to a time domain resource (See par [0371, 0372, 0377]). Claim 7 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in claim 26, as method. Regarding claim 27, Yang discloses as cited in claim 19. Yang further discloses the processor is further configured to: send to the terminal power configuration information for transmitting the predetermined service, wherein the power configuration information indicates the power parameter (See fig. 17, step S1702 and par [0372, 0377]). Claim 8 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in claim 27, as method. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regrading claim 25, Yang discloses as cited in claim 21. However, Yang fails to disclose that the processor is further configured to: in response to the terminal being in the second working state and transmitting the NR service and the NR SL service in a Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) mode, determine the power parameter for transmitting the NR service to be a third parameter and/or determine the power parameter for transmitting the NR SL service to be a fourth parameter, wherein a sum of the third parameter and the fourth parameter is less than the second parameter. Claim 6 is objected for the same reasons as set forth in claim 25, as method. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 for a listing of cited prior arts of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN A TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7858. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN A TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666471
WIRELESS CHARGING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658956
CONFIGURABLE HARMONIC REJECTION MIXER (HRM)
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658963
WEARABLE DEVICE ANTENNA
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652117
DIFFRACTION LOSS ANALYSIS DEVICE, DIFFRACTION LOSS ANALYSIS METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12640775
NFC-Enabled Constrained Device, NFC-Enabled Control Device, and Method Thereof
4y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month