Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/722,103

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2021 — JP 2021-207076 +1 more
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
782 granted / 1004 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1033
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 3, it is unclear which extending directions are being referred to in lines 5-7. In regard to claim 4, it is unclear which orientation “the orientation” on line 6 is referring to. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP 56-110527 [‘527 hereinafter]. In regard to claim 1, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] an electronic device comprising: an operation button [1] having a flange [1-2]; and a device case [2] formed with an opening [2-1] into which the operation button [1] is inserted, wherein the device case [2] is provided with a restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] that does not overlap the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] in an orientation, and that overlaps the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is to be inserted into the opening [2-1] in an orientation other than the orientation. In regard to claim 2, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 1, wherein the device case [2] is provided with, as the restricting portion, a guide rib [2-3, 2-4]] that guides the reception of the flange [1-2] into a region of the device case [2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1]. In regard to claim 4, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 2, wherein the device case [2] is provided with, as the restricting portion, a frame portion [2-3, 2-4] that defines the region, and wherein the frame portion [2-3, 2-4] does not overlap the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] in the orientation, and overlaps the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] in a predetermined orientation other than the orientation. In regard to claim 5, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 2, wherein, when the operation button [1] is rotated to an angle, the guide rib [2-3, 2-4] is engaged with the flange [1-2] to prevent the operation button [1] from rotating beyond the angle. In regard to claim 6, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] preparing a device case [2] formed with an opening [2-1] into which an operation button [1] having a flange [1-2] is inserted; preparing the operation button [1]; and inserting the operation button [1] into the opening [2-1] in an orientation, wherein the device case [2] is provided with a restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] that does not overlap the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] in the orientation, and that overlaps the flange [1-2] when the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] in an orientation other than the orientation. In regard to claim 7, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 1, wherein the flange [1-2] of the operation button [1] has a shape which each corner of lower left and lower right is cut out, wherein the flange [1-2] is configured to not engage with the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] in a case where the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] of the device case [2] in a correct orientation, and wherein the flange [1-2] is configured to engage with the restricting portion 2-3, 2-4] in a case where the operation button [1] is inserted into the opening [2-1] of the device case [2] in a wrong orientation different from the correct orientation. In regard to claim 8, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 1, wherein the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] is configured such that an interval between the flange [1-2] and the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] is widened in a case where a pressing operation is performed toward a pressing direction of the operation button [1]. In regard to claim 9, ‘527 discloses [in Figs. 2 and 3] the electronic device according to claim 1 , further comprising: a circuit board [4] provided with a fixed contact [4-1]; and a key contact member [3-1] disposed in the device case [2] and on which the operation button [1] is provided, wherein the key contact member [3-1] is provided with a movable contact [3-2], wherein the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] of the device case [2] extends along a pressing direction of the operation button [1], wherein the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] is configured to engage with the flange [1-2] in a case where the operation button [1] is rotated beyond a predetermined angle about an axis orthogonal to an opening surface of the opening [2-1], and wherein the flange [1-2] is configured to not contact with the restricting portion [2-3, 2-4] in a case where the fixed contact [4-1] and movable contact [3-2] are contacted by pushing the operation button [1] in the pressing direction and the operation button [1] contacts with an edge of the opening [2-1]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Inaba [US 4,556,769], Shen [US 8,816,231] and Eguchi [US 2025/0132108] disclose similar electronic devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676269
OPERATING DEVICE OF HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665141
ACTUATION UNIT FOR A SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658386
BREAK MECHANISM FOR SWITCHING APPARATUS AND SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651715
ROTATION DETECTION DEVICE AND STYLUS PEN
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646669
Module for Generating Opening Signals
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month